Kernel Methods in Medical Imaging

  • G. CharpiatEmail author
  • M. Hofmann
  • B. Schölkopf


We introduce machine learning techniques, more specifically kernel methods, and show how they can be used for medical imaging. After a tutorial presentation of machine learning concepts and tools, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), kernel ridge regression and kernel PCA, we present an application of these tools to the prediction of Computed Tomography (CT) images based on Magnetic Resonance (MR) images.


Support Vector Machine Feature Space Kernel Method Reproduce Kernel Hilbert Space Training Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    M. A. Aizerman, É.. M. Braverman, and L. I. Rozonoér. Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Automation and Remote Control, 25:821–837, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Aronszajn. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68:337–404, 1950.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Berg, J. P. R. Christensen, and P. Ressel. Harmonic Analysis on Semigroups. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In D. Haussler, editor, Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 144–152, Pittsburgh, PA, July 1992. ACM Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Cremers, T. Kohlberger, and C. Schnörr. Shape statistics in kernel space for variational image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 36(9):1929–1943, 2003.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Duchon. Spline minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. In W. Schempp and K. Zeller, editors, Constructive theory of functions os several variables, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 571. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Guyon, B. Boser, and V. Vapnik. Automatic capacity tuning of very large VC-dimension classifiers. In S. J. Hanson, J. D. Cowan, and C. L. Giles, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 5, pages 147–155. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Hofmann, F. Steinke, V. Scheel, G. Charpiat, M. Brady, B. Schölkopf, and B. Pichler. MR-based PET attenuation correction – method and validation. In IEEE Medical Imaging Conference, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Jurie and C. Schmid. Scale-invariant shape features for recognition of object categories. In International Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, volume II, pages 90–96, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Mercer. Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, A 209:415–446, 1909.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning). The MIT Press, December 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Schölkopf, A. J. Smola, and K.-R. Müller. Kernel principal component analysis. In B. Schölkopf, C. J. C. Burges, and A. J. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pages 327–352. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999. Short version appeared in Neural Computation 10:1299–1319, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Biological CyberneticsTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations