Abstract
Biological monitoring and assessment methods have become indispensable tools for evaluating the condition of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. When an undesirable biological condition is observed (e.g., a depauperate fish assemblage), its cause (e.g., toxic substances, excess fine sediments, or nutrients) must be determined in order to design appropriate remedial management actions. Causal analysis challenges environmental scientists to bring together, analyze, and synthesize a broad variety of information from monitoring studies, models, and experiments to determine the probable cause of ecological effects. Decision-support systems can play an important role in improving the efficiency, quality and transparency of causal analyses.
CADDIS (http://www.epa.gov/caddis) is an on-line decision framework for identifying the stressors responsible for undesirable biological conditions in aquatic systems. CADDIS was developed in response to requirements under the U.S. Clean Water Act to develop plans for restoring impaired aquatic systems. CADDIS is based on U.S. EPA’s 2000 Stressor Identification Guidance document, and draws from multiple types of eco-epidemiological evidence. A major update in 2007 added summaries of commonly encountered causes of biological impairment: metals, sediments, nutrients, flow alteration, temperature, ionic strength, low dissolved oxygen, and toxic chemicals. These reviews are designed to help practitioners choose which causes to consider, based on sources, site information, and observed biological effects. A series of conceptual models illustrates connections between sources, stressors and effects. Another major new section provides advice and tools for analyzing data and interpreting results as causal evidence; these tools help quantify associations between any cause and any biological impairment using innovative methods such as species-sensitivity distributions, biological inferences, conditional probability analysis, and quantile regression analysis.
An essential part of the development strategy for CADDIS has been the use of case studies to test the process and tools in different regions, and with different causal factors. Case studies have been conducted in streams on the urbanized east coast and the agriculturally-dominated mid-west to the arid west, and have considered causes including low dissolved oxygen, increased temperature, toxic substances, altered food resources and fine sediments. Lessons learned from the case studies include the importance of a structure for organizing the large variety of evidence that is often available, the need for well-matched reference sites for comparison, the benefits of iterative and directed data collection, and the frequency of surprising results. The case studies illustrate the promise of CADDIS: by building on the foundation of biological monitoring, we can provide a powerful means for improving the health of our aquatic systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Cormier SM, Norton SB, Suter GW II, Altfater D, Counts B (2002) Determining probable causes of ecological impairment in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: Part 2. Characterization of causes. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1125–1137
Davis WS (1995) Biological Assessment and Criteria: Building on the Past. In: Davis WS, Simon TP (eds). Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 7–14
Dawes RM (2001) Everyday Irrationality. Westfield Press, Boulder, CO, USA
Environmental Sciences Division, Jacobs Engineering Group (1996) Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study of the Clinch River/Poplar Creek Operable Unit.ORNL/ER-315/V1&D3. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN
Fox GA (1991) Practical Causal Inference for Ecoepidemiologists. J Toxicol Environ Health 33(4):359–373
Hill AB (1965) The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proc Roy Soc Med 58:295–300
Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Hueristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York
Marchant R (1997) Classification and prediction of macroinvertebrate assemblages from running water in Victoria, Australia. J North Am Benthol Soc 16:644–681
Metcalfe-Smith J (1994) Biological water-quality assessment of rivers: Use of macroinvertebrate communities. In: Calow P, Petts G (eds). The Rivers Handbook, Hydrological and Ecological Principles. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, pp 144–170
Nisbett R, Ross L (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs NJ, USA
Norton SB, Cormier SM, Suter GW II, Subramanian B, Lin E, Altfater D et al. (2002) Determining probable causes of ecological impairment in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: Part I. Listing candidate causes and analyzing evidence. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1112–1124
Norton SB, Rao L, Suter GW (2003) Minimizing cognitive errors in site-specific causal assessments. Human Ecol Risk Assess 9:213–229
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Volume II: Users Manual for Biological Assessment of Ohio Surface Waters.WQMA-SWS-6. Division of Water Quality Planning and Assessment, Ecological Assessment Section, Columbus, OH
Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD (1989) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Rivers and Streams: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish.EPA-440-4-89-001. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington DC, USA
Russo JE, Schoemaker PJH (1989) Decision Traps: The Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision-Making and How to Overcome Them. Simon and Schuster, New York
Schofield K (2007) Simple Conceptual Model for Nutrients. In: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Causal Analysis/Diagnosis Decision Information System (CADDIS) http://www.epa.gov/caddis. Accessed October 9, 2008.
Stark TB, Maxted JR (2007) A biotic index for New Zealand's soft-bottomed streams. NZ J Mar Freshwater Res 41:43–61
Susser M (1986) Rules of Inference in Epidemiology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 6:116–128
Suter GW II, Barnthouse LW, Efroymson RE, Jager H (1999) Ecological risk assessment of a large river-reservoir: 2. Fish community. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(4):589–598
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Consolidated Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable Rivers.EPA-822-R-02-048. Office of Water, Washington DC, USA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Methods/Indicators for Determining when Metals are the Cause of Biological Impairments of Rivers and Streams: Species Sensitivity Distributions and Chronic Exposure-Response Relationships from Laboratory Data. NCEA-1494. Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2006a) Estimation and application of macroinvertebrate tolerance values. EPA/600/P-04/116A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2006b) Framework for developing suspended and bedded sediments water quality criteria. EPA-822-R-06-001. Washington, DC
Yuan LL (2007) Using biological assemblage composition to infer the values of covarying environmental factors. Freshw Biol 52:1159–1175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norton, S.B. et al. (2009). CADDIS: The Causal Analysis/Diagnosis Decision Information System. In: Marcomini, A., Suter II, G., Critto, A. (eds) Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09721-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09722-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)