Abstract
In many engineering design problems, the explicit function form of objectives/constraints can not be given in terms of design variables. Given the value of design variables, under this circumstance, the value of those functions is obtained by some simulation analysis or experiments, which are often expensive in practice. In order to make the number of analyses as few as possible, techniques for model predictive optimization (also referred to as sequential approximate optimization or metamodeling) which make optimization in parallel with model prediction have been developed. In this paper, we discuss several methods using computational intelligence for this purpose along with applications to multi-objective optimization under static/dynamic environment.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Support Vector Machine
- Support Vector Regression
- Model Predictive Control
- Aspiration Level
- Pareto Solution
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V., (1995) Support Vector Networks, Machine Learning, 20, pp. 273-297
Deb, K. and Srinivasan, A., (2005) Innovization:Innovative Design Principles Through Optimization, KanGAL Report #2005007, Indian Institute of Technology
Erenguc, S.S. and Koehler, G.J., (1990) Survey of Mathematical Programming Models and Experimental Results for Linear Discriminant Analysis, Managerial and Decision Economics, 11,215-225
Freed, N. and Glover, F., (1981) Simple but Powerful Goal Programming Models for Discriminant Problems, European J. of Operational Research, 7, 44-60
Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W.J., (1998) Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions, J. of Global Optimization, 13, 455-92
Myers, R.H. and Montgomery, D.C., (1995) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, Wiley
Nakayama, H., Arakawa, M. and Sasaki, R., (2002) Simulation based Optimization for Unknown Objective Functions, Optimization and Engineering, 3, 201-214
Nakayama, H., Arakawa, M. and Washino, K., (2003) Optimization for Black-box Objective Functions, Optimization and Optimal Control, (eds.) P.M. Pardalos, I. Tseveendorj and R. Enkhbat, World Scientific, 185-210
Nakayama, H. and Sawaragi, Y., (1984), Satisficing Trade-off Method for Multi- objective Programming, in M. Grauer and A. Wierzbicki (eds.): Interactive Decision Analysis, Springer, 113-122
Nakayama, H. and Yun, Y., (2006) Generating Support Vector Machines using Multiobjective Optimization and Goal Programming Multi-objective Machine Learning, Yaochu Jin(ed.), Springer Series on Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp.173-198.
Nakayama, H. and Yun, Y., (2006) Support Vector Regression Based on Goal Programming and Multi-objective Programming, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, CD-ROM (Paper ID : 1536)
Sch ölkopf, B. and Smola, A.J., (1998) New Support Vector Algorithms, NeuroCOLT2 Technical report Series, NC2-TR-1998-031
Vapnik, V.N., (1998) Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York
Yoon, M., Yun, Y.B. and Nakayama, H., (2003) A Role of Total Margin in Support Vector Machines, Proc. IJCNN’03, 2049-2053
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nakayama, H., Yun, Y. (2008). Multi-objective Model Predictive Optimization using Computational Intelligence. In: Bramer, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice II. IFIP AI 2008. IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 276. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09695-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09695-7_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09694-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09695-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)