This chapter concerns the forecasting of crime locations using burglary as an example. An overview of research concerned with when and where burglaries occur is provided, with an initial focus on patterns of risk at the individual household level. Of central importance is evidence that as well as being geographically concentrated (at a range of geographic scales), burglary clusters in space and time more than would be expected if patterns of crime were simply the result of some places being more attractive to offenders than others. One theoretical framework regarding offender spatial decision making is discussed and consideration given to how features of the urban environment which affect the accessibility of places (e.g., road networks or social barriers) might shape patterns of offending. A simple mathematical model informed by the research discussed is then presented and tested as to its accuracy in the prediction of burglary locations. The model is tested against chance expectation and popular methods of crime hot-spotting extant and found to outperform both. Consideration of the importance of different units of analysis is a recurrent theme throughout the chapter, whether this concerns the intended policy purpose of crime forecasts made, the spatial resolution of different types of data analyzed, or the attention given to the dimension of time – a unit of analysis often overlooked in this type of work. The chapter concludes with a discussion of means of developing the approach described, combining it with others, and using it, inter alia, to optimize police patrol routes.
- Monte Carlo
- Kernel Density Estimation
- Predictive Mapping
- Crime Type
- Areal Unit
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Armitage, R. (2007). Sustainability versus safety: Confusion, conflict and contradiction in designing out crime. In: G. Farrell, K. J. Bowers, S. D. Johnson & M. Townsley (Eds.), Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Ashton, J., Brown, I., Senior, B., & Pease, K. (1998). Repeat victimisation: Offender accounts. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 3(4), 269–279.
Bailey, T. C., & Gatrell, A. C. (1995). Interactive spatial data analysis. Harlow: Longman.
Beavon, D. J. K., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. In: R. V. G. Clarke (Ed.), Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 2, Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981) Environmental criminology. Rev. ed. 1991 Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1991.
Brantingham P. J. (1978). A Theoretical model of crime site selection. In: M. D. Krohn & R. L. Ackers (Eds.), Crime, Law and Sanctions: Theoretical Perspectives. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bernasco W. (2008). Them Again? Same-offender Involvement in Repeat and Near Repeat Burglaries. European Journal of Criminology, 5(4), forthcoming.
Bernasco, W., & Luykx, F. (2003). Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighbourhoods. Criminology, 41, 981–1001.
Bernasco, W., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). How do residential burglars select target areas? British Journal of Criminology, 45, 295–315.
Bennett, T., & Wright, R. (1984). Burglars on Burglary. Aldershot: Gower.
Besag, J., & Diggle, P. J. (1977). Simple monte carlo tests for spatial pattern. Applied Statistics, 26, 327–333.
Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). Domestic burglary repeats and space-time clusters: The dimensions of risk. European Journal of Criminology, 2(1), 67–92.
Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S., & Pease, K. (2004). Prospective hotspotting: The future of crime mapping? British Journal of Criminology, 44(5), 641–658.
Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S., & Pease, K. (2005). Victimisation and re-victimisation risk, housing type and area: A study of interactions. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 7, 7–17.
Brown, P. J. B. (1991). Exploring Geodemographics.’ In: I. Masser & M. Blakemore (Eds.),Geographic Information Management: Methodology and Applications, London: Longman.
Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries, Criminology 44(2), 431–464.
Cornish, D. (1994). The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational crime prevention. In: R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime Prevention Studies, (Vol. 3, pp. 151–196). Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271.
Ericsson, U. (1995). Straight from the Horse’s Mouth. Forensic Update, 43, 23–25.
Everson S. P., & Pease K. (2001). Crime against the same person and place: detection opportunity and offender targeting. In: G. Farrell & K.Pease (Eds.), Repeat Victimisation. Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Everson, S. (2003). Repeat victimisation and prolific offending: Chance or choice? International Journal of Police Science and Management, 5, 180–194.
Farrell, G. (2005). Progress and prospects in the prevention of repeat victimization. In: N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime Prevention and Community Safety. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Groff, E. R., & LaVigne, N. G. (2001). Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 257–278.
Hillier, B. (2004). Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International, 9, 31–45.
Hakim, S., Rengert, G. F., & Schachmurove, Y. (2001). Target search of burglars: A revised economic model. Papers in Regional Science, 80, 121–137.
Johnson, S., Bowers, K., & Hirschfield, A. (1997). New insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of repeat victimisation. British Journal of Criminology, 37(2), 224–241
Johnson, S. D., Bernasco, W., Bowers, K. J., Elffers, H., Ratcliffe, J., Rengert, G., & Townsley, M. T. (2007). Near repeats: A cross national assessment of residential burglary. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(3), 201–219.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2004a). The burglary as a clue to the future: the beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. European Journal of Criminology, 1(2), 237–255.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2004b). The stability of space-time clusters of burglary. British Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 55–65.
Knox, G. (1964). Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in northumberland and durham. British Journal of Preventative and Social Medicine, 18, 17–24.
Matthiopoulos, J. (2003). The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecological Modelling, 159, 239–268.
Morgan, F. (2001). Repeat burglary in a Perth Suburb: Indicator of Short-Term or Long-Term risk? In: G. Farrell, & K. Pease (Eds.), Repeat Victimisation: Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 12, Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Nee, C., & Meenaghan, A. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 935–949.
North, B. V., Curtis, D., & Sham, P. C. (2002). A note on the Calculation of Empirical P Values from Monte Carlo Procedures. American. Journal. of Human. Genetics, 71, 439–441.
Pease, K. (1998). Repeat Victimization: Taking Stock. The Home Office: Police Research Group: Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 90.
Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C., & Pease, K. (1991). The time course of repeat burglary victimisation. British Journal of Criminology, 31(4), 411–414.
Poot, C., Luykx, F., Elffers, H., & Dudnik, C. (2005). Hier wonen en daar plegen? Sociale grenzen en locatiekeuze. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 47(3), 255–268.
Ratcliffe, J. (2000). Aoristic analysis: The spatial interpretation of unspecific temporal events. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(7), 669–79.
Ratcliffe, J. (2006). A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(3), 261–291.
Rengert, G., & Wasilchick, J. (2000). Suburban Burglary: A Tale of Two Suburbs. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
Lebeau, J. L., & Rengert, G. (2006). The role of Racial/Ethnic barriers in the movement of drug offenders. Presentation at the Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis Seminar,Vancouver, June, 2006.
Reynald, R., Averdijk, M., Elffers, H., & Bernasco, W. (2006). Do social barriers affect urban crime trips? The effects of ethnic and socio-economic neighborhood compositions on the flow of crime in The Hague, The Netherlands. (NSCR 2006-4) Leiden.
Shaw M., & Pease K. (2000). Research on Repeat Victimisation in Scotland’. Crime and Criminal Justice Research Findings 44. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Townsley, M., Homel, R., & Chaseling, J. (2003). Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615–633.
Tseloni A., Wittebrood, K., Farrell, G., & Pease K. (2004). Burglary Victimisation in the US, England and Wales and the Netherlands: Cross-national comparison of routine activity patterns. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 66–91.
Tseloni A., & Kershaw, C. (2005). Predicting crime rates: fear and disorder based on area information. Evidence from the British Crime Survey. International Review of Victimology, 12, 295–313.
Winchester, S. W. C., & Jackson, H. (1982). Residential Burglary: The Limits of Prevention. Home Office Research Study 74. London: HMSO.
Wright, R.T., & Decker, S. (1994). Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-Ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K.J., Birks, D.J., Pease, K. (2009). Predictive Mapping of Crime by ProMap: Accuracy, Units of Analysis, and the Environmental Backcloth. In: Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G.J. (eds) Putting Crime in its Place. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0973-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09688-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)