Abstract
Social scientists have had a long and enduring interest in the geography of crime and the explanation of variation of crime at place. In this introductory chapter, we first describe the history of crime and place studies, showing that in the course of two centuries, scholars have increasingly focused their interest on smaller spatial units of analysis. In the 19th century, they typically studied large administrative districts such as regions and countries. The Chicago School focused on much smaller urban communities. More recently, interest has moved toward geographic units as small as street blocks or addresses. After this historical account, we address specific questions regarding how the unit of analysis should be chosen for crime and place studies. We address substantive theoretical, statistical, and practical problems that are raised in choosing appropriate levels of geography for research and practice. We discuss issues of theory and data and consider the factors that have inhibited the study of units of analysis of crime at place to date, mentioning the specific contributions to the unit of analysis problem that are made by the chapters that follow.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182.
Anderson, D., Chenery, S., & Pease, K. (1995). Biting back: Tackling repeat burglary and car crime. Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 58. London: Home Office.
Anselin, L., Cohen, J., Cook, D., Gorr, W., & Tita, G. (2000). Spatial analyses of crime. In: D. Duffee, (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Volume 4. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 213–262). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Balbi, A., & Guerry, A.-M. (1829). Statistique comparée de l’état de l’instruction et du nombre des crimes dans les divers arrondissements des Académies et des Cours Royales de France. Paris.
Baldwin, J., & Bottoms, A. E. (1976). The urban criminal. London: Tavistock.
Beirne, P. (1987). Adolphe Quetelet and the origins of positivist criminology. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1140–1169.
Beirne, P. (1993). Inventing criminology: Essays on the rise of ‘homo criminalis.’ New York: State University of New York Press.
Beirne, P., & Messerschmidt, J. (1991). Criminology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Birkbeck, C., & LaFree, G. (1993). The situational analysis of crime and deviance. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 113–137.
Block, C., Dabdoub, M., & Fregly, S. (Eds.) (1995). Crime analysis through computer mapping. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Boggs, S. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 899–908.
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–115.
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1975). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12, 104–125.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1990). Situational crime prevention in practice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 17–40.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1991). The dimensions of crime. In: P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 7–26). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. (Original work published 1981).
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory, Vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1999). Theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8, 7–26.
Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Burgess, E. W. (1967). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In: R. E. Park & E. W. Burgess (Eds.), The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behaviour in the urban environment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1925).
Burgess, E. W., & Bogue, D. J. (1964a). Research in urban society: A long view. In: E. W. Burgess & D. J. Bogue (Eds.), Contributions to urban sociology (pp. 1–14). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Burgess, E. W., & Bogue, D. J. (1964b). The delinquency research of Clifford R. Shaw and Henry D. McKay and associates. In: E. W. Burgess & D. J. Bogue (Eds.), Contributions to urban sociology (pp. 591–615). Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Bursik, R. J. Jr. (1984). Urban dynamics and ecological studies of delinquency. Social Forces, 63, 393–413.
Bursik, R. J. Jr. (1986). Ecological stability and the dynamics of delinquency. In: A. J. Reiss, Jr. & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 8, pp. 35–66). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bursik, R. J. Jr., & Webb, J. (1982). Community change and patterns of delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 24–42.
Burt, C. (1944). The young delinquent. London: University of London Press. (Original work published 1924).
Chainey, S., & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Chilton, R .J. (1964). Continuity in delinquency area research: a comparison of studies for Baltimore, Detroit, and Indianapolis. American Sociological Review, 29, 71–83.
Chilton, R. J., & Dussich, J. P. (1974). Methodological issues in delinquency research: Some alternative analysis of geographical distributed data. Social Forces, 53(1), 73–82.
Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 14, pp. 225–256). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, R. V. (1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.
Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. In: M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 19, pp. 91–150). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–605.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Crow, W., & Bull, J. (1975). Robbery deterrence: An applied behavioral science demonstration – Final report. La Jolla, CA: Western Behavioral Science Institute.
Curtis, L. A. (1974). Criminal violence: National patterns and behavior. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
Ducpétiaux, E. (1827). De la Justice de prévoyance, et particulièrement de l’influence de la misère et de l’aisance, de l’ignorance et de l’instruction sur le nombre des crimes. Bruxelles: J. J. de Cautaerts.
Duffala, D. C. (1976). Convenience stores, armed robbery, and physical environmental features. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 227–246.
Durkheim, E. (1964[1893]). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893).
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In: J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 1–33). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (2004). What can the police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.
Elmer, M. C. (1933). Century-old ecological studies in France. American Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 63–70.
Erickson, M. L. (1971). The group context of delinquent behavior. Social Problems, 19(1), 114–129.
Erickson, M. L., & Jensen, G. F. (1977). Delinquency is still group behavior! Toward revitalizing the group premise in the sociology of deviance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68(2), 262–273.
Faris, R. E. L. (1967). Chicago sociology 1920–1932. San Francisco: Chandler.
Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (Eds.), (2001). Repeat Victimization. Crime Prevention Studies Vol. 12. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. Police Research Series Paper 98. London: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit; Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
Fletcher, J. (1850). Summary of the moral statistics of England and Wales. London: Private distribution of the author.
Forrester, D., Chatterston, M., & Pease, K. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary reduction project, Rochdale. London: Home Office Crime Prevention Unit.
Friendly, M. (2007). A.-M. Guerry’s moral statistics of France: Challenges for multivariable spatial analysis. Statistical Science, 22, 368–399.
Glyde, J. (1856). Localities of crime in Suffolk. Journal of Statistical Society of London, 19, 102–106.
Gold, M. (1970). Delinquent behavior in an American city. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gordon, R. A. (1967). Issues in the ecological study of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 32, 927–944.
Green (Mazerolle), L. (1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Greg, W. R. (1839). Social statistics of the Netherlands. London: Ridgway, Harrison and Crosfield.
Guerry, A.-M. (1832). La Statistique comparée de l’état de l’instruction et du nombre des crimes. Revue Encyclopédique, 55, 414–424.
Guerry, A.-M. (1833). Essai sur la statistique morale de la France. Paris: Crochard.
Guerry, A.-M. (1864). Statistique morale de l’Angleterre compare avec la Statistique Morale de la France. Paris: Bailliére.
Harvey, L. (1987). Myths of the Chicago school of sociology. Hong Kong: Avebury.
Hipp, J. R. (2007). Block, tract, and level of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72, 659–680.
Hunter, R. D. (1988). Environmental characteristics of convenience store robberies in the state of Florida. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
Jeffery, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kenwitz, J. W. (1987). Cartography in France: 1660–1848. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Klein, M. (1969). On the group context of delinquency. Sociology and Social Research, 54, 63–71.
Kobrin, S., & Schuerman, L. A. (1981). Ecological processes in the creation of delinquency areas: An update. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Toronto, Canada.
Landau, D., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1968). Quetelet, Adolphe. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 13, 247–257.
Lander, B. (1954). Towards an understanding of juvenile delinquency. New York: Columbia University Press.
LeBeau, J. L. (1987). The methods and measures of centrography and the spatial dynamics of rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3, 125–141.
Lombroso, C. (2006). Criminal man (translated and with a new introduction by M. Gibson & N. Han Rafter),.Durham, NC: Duke University Press. (Original work published 1878).
Maltz, M. D., Gordon, A. C., & Friedman, W. (2000). Mapping crime in its community setting: Event geography analysis. Originally published New York: Springer-Verlag. Internet edition available at http://www.utc.edu/depts/lib/forr. (Original work published 1990).
Mayhew, H. (1865). London labour and the London poor. Volume 4: Those that will not work. London: Charles Griffin.
Mayhew, H. (1950). London’s underworld: Being selections from ‘Those that will not work’, the 4th volume of ‘London labour and the London poor’ (edited by P. Quennell). London: Spring Books. (Original work published 1851 & 1862).
Mayhew, P., Clarke, R. V., Sturman, A., & Hough, M. (1976). Crime as opportunity. Home Office Research Study, Vol. 34. London: Home Office, H.M. Stationary Office.
Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy and the spatial dynamics of homicide. Criminology, 39, 517–560.
Morris, T. (1957). The criminal area: A study in social ecology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. In: W. Skogan & K. Frydl (Eds.). Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nettler, G. (1978). Explaining crime. Montreal: McGraw-Hill.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through environmental design. New York: Macmillan.
Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: Geo Books.
Parent-Duchâtelet, A. J. B. (1837). Prostitution dans la ville de Paris. Paris.
Park, R. E. (1967). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behaviour in the urban environment. In: R. E. Park & E. W. Burgess (Eds.), The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behaviour in the urban environment (pp. 1–46). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1925).
Paulsen, D. J., & Robinson, M. B. (2004). Spatial aspects of crime: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Pierce, G., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. R. (1986). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Boston, MA: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.
Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C., & Pease, K. (1990). Repeat break and enter victimisation: Time course and crime prevention opportunity. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 8–11.
Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C., & Pease, K (1991). The time course of repeat burglary victimization. British Journal of Criminology, 31(4), 411–414.
Pyle, G. F. (1976). Spatial and temporal aspects of crime in Cleveland, Ohio. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 175–198.
Quetelet, A. (1847). Statistique morale de l’influence du libre arbitre de l’homme sur les faits sociaux, et particulièrement sur le nombre des mariages, Bulletin de la Commission Centrale de Statistique, III, 135–155.
Quetelet, A. (1984). Research on the propensity for crime at different ages, translated and with an introduction by S.F. Sylvester. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing. (Original work published 1831).
Ratcliffe, J. H., & McCullagh, M. J. (1999). Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. Geographical Systems, 1, 385–398.
Rawson, R. W. (1839). An inquiry into the statistics of crime in England and Wales. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 2, 316–344.
Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1986). Why are communities important in understanding crime? In: M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 8, pp. 1–33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reiss, A. J. Jr., & Tonry, M. (1986). Preface. In: A. J. Reiss Jr. & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research, (Vol. 8, pp. vii–viii). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1988). Co-offending and criminal careers. In: A. J. Reiss Jr., & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 10, pp. 117–170). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rengert, G. F. (1980). Spatial aspects of criminal behavior. In: D. E. Georges-Abeyie & K. D. Harries (Eds.), Crime: A spatial perspective (pp. 47–57). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rengert, G. F. (1981). Burglary in Philadelphia: A critique of an opportunity structure model. In: P. Brantingham & P. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 189–201). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology, 37(2), 427–446.
Rhodes, W. M., & Conly, C. (1981). Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In: P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.
Roncek, D. W. (2000). Schools and crime. In: V. Goldsmith, P. G. McGuire, J. H. Mollenkopf, & T. A. Ross (Eds.), Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice (pp. 153–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Roncek, D. W., & R. Bell. (1981). Bars, blocks, and crimes. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11(1), 35–47.
Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. New York: CRC Press.
Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhoods and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7–40.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
Sarnecki, J. (1986). Delinquent networks. Stockholm: National Council for Crime Prevention.
Schuerman, L., & Kobrin, S. (1986). Community careers in crime. In: A. J. Reiss Jr. & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 8, pp. 67–100). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Shaw, C. R. (with F. M. Zorbaugh, H. D. McKay, & L. Cotrell) (1929). Delinquent areas: A study of the geographical distribution of school truants, juvenile delinquents, and adult offenders in Chicago. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1931). Social factors in juvenile delinquency. Report on the Causes of Crime, National Commission of Law Enforcement and Observance, vol. 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press (Rev. ed.). (Original work published 1942).
Sherman, L. W. (1995). Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In: J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and Place. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime ‘hot spots’: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–55.
Short, J. F. Jr., & Moland, J. Jr. (1976). Politics and youth gangs: A follow-up study. The Sociological Quarterly, 17, 162–179.
Skogan, W. (1986). Fear of crime and neighbourhood change. In: A. J. Reiss Jr. & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 8, pp. 203–229). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American cities. New York: Free Press.
Smith, D.A. (1987). Police response to interpersonal violence: Defining the parameters of legal control. Social Forces, 65(3), 767–782.
Symons, J. (2000). On crime and density of population. In: D. M. Horton (Ed.), Pioneering perspectives in criminology: The literature of 19th century criminological positivism (pp. 279–285). Incline Village, NV: Copperhouse. (Original work published 1857).
Tarde, J.-G. (1912). Penal philosophy (translated by R. Howell). Boston: Little, Brown and Company. (Original work published 1890).
Taylor, R. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.
Thomas, W. I. (1966). Social disorganization and social reorganization. In: M. Janovitz (Ed.), On social organization and social personality: Selected papers (pp. 3–11). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: Phoenix Books. (Abridged ed. 1963).
Vold, G. B., Bernard, T. J., & Snipes, J. B. (2002). Theoretical criminology (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Waring, E. J. (1998). Incorporating co-offending in sentencing models: An analysis of fines imposed on antitrust offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3), 283–305.
Waring, E. J. (2002). Co-offending as a network form of social organization. Advances in Criminological Theory, 10, 31–48.
Warr, M. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34(1), 11–37.
Weisburd, D. (2002). From criminals to criminal contexts: Reorienting criminal justice research and policy. Advances in Criminological Theory, 10, 197–216.
Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. (2006). Hot spots policing as a model for police innovation. In: D. Weisburd & A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 225–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weisburd, D., & Britt, C. (2007). Statistics in criminal justice (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–321.
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. (2004). What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder and Fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593 (May), 42–65.
Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In: D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City DMA experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711–735.
Weisburd, D., & McEwen, T. (1997). Introduction: Crime mapping and crime prevention. In: D. Weisburd & T. McEwen (Eds.), Crime mapping and crime prevention (pp. 1–23). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Weisburd, D., Maher, L., & Sherman, L. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot spots of crime. In: F. Adler & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 4, pp. 45–70). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549–592.
Wikström, P.-O., & Butterworth, D. A. (2006). Adolescent crime: Individual differences and lifestyles. Devon: Willan.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zorbaugh, H. W. (1929). The gold coast and the slum: A sociological study of Chicago’s near north side. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weisburd, D., Bruinsma, G.J., Bernasco, W. (2009). Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology: Historical Development, Critical Issues, and Open Questions. In: Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G.J. (eds) Putting Crime in its Place. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0973-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09688-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)