Advanced Satellite Infrastructures in Future Global Grid Computing Network Solutions to Compensate Delivery Delay

  • B. Bonito
  • A. Gotta
  • R. Secchi
Conference paper
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)


Scientific equipment in remote locations may be integrated in a grid network by means of satellite links. When the grid is an Internet overlay network, TCP-like congestion control protocols tend to introduce large delays and to achieve poor bandwidth utilization during the start-up phase due to the large bandwidth-delay product of the satellite link. Recent studies demonstrate that the loss of performance is high when a demand assignment multiple access (DAMA) scheme is adopted to manage satellite resources. To overcome this problem, we propose a new mechanism based on Quick Start, a recent IETF recommendation, to enhance the startup performance of data and streaming flows. We show, by means of extensive simulations, that our modifications to enable a QS-based DAMA algorithm allow the initial end-to-end delay to be significantly reduced and the queue length in transmitting nodes stabilized. Moreover, our results point out that the start-up delay is quite independent of the flow rate, which makes this algorithm suitable to the high bitrate required by grid computing applications.


Congestion Control Round Trip Time Satellite Network Quick Start Satellite Link 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Interaction Channel for Satellite Distribution Systems, ETSI EN 301 790 V1.4.1 - (2005–09).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. Feltrin, E. Weller, E. Martin, and K. Zamani, “Design, Implementation and Performances of an on Board Processor-Based Satellite Network”, in Proceedings of ICC 2004, pp. 3321–3325 vol.6.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. Floyd, M. Handley, and E. Kohler, “Problem Statement for the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol”, RFC 4336, March 2006.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Floyd and E. Kohler, “TCP Friendly Rate Control: the Small-Packet Variant”, draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-05, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Gotta, F. Potortì, and R. Secchi, “An Analysis of TCP Startup over an Experimental DVB-RCS Platform”, in Proceedings of IEEE IWSSC 2006, pp. 176–180, Madrid (Spain), Sept.14–15, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Gotta, R. Secchi, and F. Potortì, “Simulating Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation on Satellite Links”, in Proceedings of Valuetools 2006, ACM, Pisa (IT), October 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Handley, S. Floyd, J. Padhye, and J. Widmer, “ TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification”, RFC 3448, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    V. Jacobson, “Congestion Avoidance and Control”, in Proceedings of ACM Sigcomm, pp. 273–288, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. McCanne and S. Floyd, Network Simulator.
  10. [10]
    P. Sarolahti, M. Allman, and S. Floyd, “Determining an Appropriate Sending Rate over an Underutilized Network Path”, Computer Networks, November 2006.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Sathiaseelan and G. Fairhurst, “Using Quickstart to Improve the Performance of TFRC-SP over Satellite Networks” in proceedings of IEEE IWSSC 2006, pp. 46–50, Madrid (Spain), Sept.14–15, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications, RFC 1889, January 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bonito
    • 1
  • A. Gotta
    • 1
  • R. Secchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Science and Technology Institute ISTI - CNR Italian National Research CouncilSan Cataldo, 56124 PisaItaly

Personalised recommendations