Advertisement

Conceptual Model of Activity as Tool for Developing a Dementia Care Support System

  • Helena Lindgren
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 270)

The clinical domain of cognitive diseases and dementia is recognized by its highly complex knowledge domain, requiring expertise and experience in handling situations with a variety of symptoms and diseases, distributed over different levels in organizations and different professions. In this paper a case study is presented where the process of investigating suspected dementia in patient cases were analyzed. An early prototype of the decision-support system DMSS (Dementia Management and Support System) was integrated in the process. The main aim for the case study was to capture and model the complex target activity for the purpose of knowledge acquisition and formalization in the development of a decision-support system for the domain. The resulting model is general, in that it captures structures and required knowledge at different levels of care, however, specific enough to provide a perception of use context and semi-formal base for further development of the system for different use environments, with different local solutions to work division, etc. The results are fed into the development of DMSS and the general activity analysis framework is being developed.

Keywords

Activity theory Work analysis Knowledge-based systems Decision support Knowledge management Dementia care 

References

  1. 1.
    Lindgren, H.: Decision Support in Dementia Care - Developing Systems for Interactive Reasoning. (2007) http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1138. Accessed 4 Feb 2008.
  2. 2.
    Bødker, S.: A human activity approach to user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, pp. 171-195 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engeström, Y.: Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., Macaulay, C.: The Activity Checklist: A tool for representing the “Space” of context. Interactions, July - August (1999).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Harvard University Press (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Häkkinen, H., Korpela, M.: A participatory assessment of IS integration needs in maternity clinics using activity theory. Int. J. Med. Inf. Vol. 76, pp. 843-849 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, G.: Investigating the support of reflective activities by collaborative technologies: an activity theory based research model. In: Proc. TT211C2006, pp. 49-58 (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    WHO.: International classification of functioning, ability and health: ICF. http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm. Accessed 4 Feb 2008.
  9. 9.
    Lindgren, H., Eklund, P.: Differential diagnosis of dementia in an argumentation framework. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems Vol. 16, pp. 1-8 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.: Institutions: Abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery Vol. 39, pp. 95-146 (1992).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meseguer, J.: General logics. In: Logic Colloquium ’87, pp 275-329 Elsevier, North-Holland (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eklund, P., Helgesson, R., Lindgren, H.: Towards refining clinical evidence using general logics. To appear in: Proc. ICAIS (2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eklund, P., Lindgren, H.: Towards dementia diagnosis logic. In: 11th Int. Conf. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (IPMU'06), 1251- 2257. Editions EDK, Paris (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Lindgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUmeå UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations