CoLinK: Cooperative Knowledge Management for Engineering Teams

  • Michael Klingemann
  • Jürgen Friedrich
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 270)

Due to today’s increasingly complex processes in planning and design, knowledge management (KM) is becoming a crucial factor of success in the engineering sector. In a participatory design project we created a prototype for a process oriented KM system (CoLinK), which allows engineers to jointly model projects with generic process descriptions, creating a virtual engineering community within the enterprise and beyond. During every project these process descriptions will be augmented with knowledge annotations. The CoLinK system includes a document as well as contact management module and lets users semantically link the corresponding information in the process context. With any finished project engineers can utilize the acquired knowledge to cooperatively improve the quality of the generic process descriptions.

Keywords

Knowledge management Engineering Cooperative work CoLinK 

References

  1. 1.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedrich, J.: Participatory prototyping. In: Rauner, F., Maclean, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Vocational Education Research. Springer Publishers, Dordrecht (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory design: issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 7, pp. 167-185 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gärtner, J.: Participatory design in consulting. Computer Supported Cooperative Work - A Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 7, pp. 273-289 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polany, M.: The tacit dimension. Routledge and Keel Paul, London (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neale, D.C., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B.: Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks. In: CSCW ’04, Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 112-121, ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramage, M.: The learning way: Evaluating co-operative systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Argyris, C.: On organizational learning. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford/Malden (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz, D.G., Divitini, M., Brasethvik, T. (Eds.): Internet-based organizational memory and knowledge management. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramage, M., Reiff, F.: Links between organisational memory and cooperative awareness. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/cseg/projects/evaluation/OM_CA.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2008.
  11. 11.
    Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P., Traverso, P.: Enabling distributed knowledge management: managerial and technological implications. Informatik/Informatique, no. 1, pp. 23-29 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dreyfus, H. L., Dreyfus, S. E.: Mind over machine. Free Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shankar, R., Singh, M. D., Gupta, A., Narain, R.: Strategic planning for knowledge management implementation in engineering firms. Work Study, Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 190-200 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edler, J.: Knowledge management in German industry. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe (January 2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simmie, J., Strambach, S.: The contribution of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 26-40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Twenty years of CSCW - what have we learned? Plenary panel. CSCW ‘06, ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ACM (Ed.): GROUP ’07. Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pipek, V., Wulf, V.: Pruning the Answer Garden: Knowledge Sharing in Maintenance Engineering. In: European Conference on CSCW, Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 1-20 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ackerman, M.S., Malone, T. W.: Answer Garden: A Tool for Growing Organzational Memory. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems, pp. 31-39, (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perry, M.J.: Distributed cognition and computer supported collaborative design: The organisation of work in construction engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Brunel University, Uxbridge (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoffmann, M., Loser, K., Walter, T., Herrmann, T.: A design process for embedding knowledge management in everyday work. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Groupware, ACM, pp. 296-305 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Klingemann
    • 1
  • Jürgen Friedrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Computing TechnologiesUniversity of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations