A Community of Knowledge Management Practitioners: Mirroring Power across Social Worlds
In our previous study, we focused on two spaces: a community of knowledge management (KM) practitioners and their respective work organizations. We found that the “community” largely existed to legitimize KM practices, rather than to learn KM practices. Our current study builds upon this work by uncovering how in fact power relationships in work organizations are transferred and mirrored into the community. Consequently, these relationships shape and define the community’s processes: they set up boundaries of the community, reinforce the knowledge sharing practices among the members, and institutionalize community members’ beliefs of KM. We have adopted Strauss’s social world perspective to better understand how the actions and interactions outside of the community impact and mold the community.
KeywordsKnowledge management Social worlds Community of practice Power Aerospace industry
- AIA: Statement by Mr. John W. Douglass President & Chief Executive Officer Aerospace Industries Association of America (2006). Available via www.aia-aerospace.org/aianews/speeches/2006/statement_douglass_061306.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2008.
- Brown, J.S., and Duguid, P.: The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003).Google Scholar
- Brown, K.: Staying ahead of the curve 2003: The AARP in retirement study (2003). Available via www.aarp.org/research. Accessed 4 Feb 2008.
- Dalkir, K.: Knowledge management in theory and practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA (2005).Google Scholar
- Denning, S.: The leader’s guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of business narrative. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2005).Google Scholar
- Hasanali, F., Hubert, C., Newhouse, B., O’Dell, C., Westal, W., et al.: Communities of practice: A guide for your journey to knowledge management best practice. American Productivity & Quality Center, Houston (2002).Google Scholar
- Latour, B.: Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2005).Google Scholar
- Lave, L. and Wenger, E.: Practice, person, social world. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky, pp.143-150. Routledge, New York (1991).Google Scholar
- Lave, L. and Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1991a).Google Scholar
- Lorell, M.A., Lowell, J., Moore, R.M., Greenfield, V.,Vlachos, K., et al.: Going global? U.S. government policy and the defense aerospace industry. RAND Corporation, Washington D.C. (2002).Google Scholar
- Mark, G., and Poltrock, S.: Shaping technology across social worlds: groupware adoption in a distributed organization. Proc. ACM Conf. Supporting Group Work GROUP’03, 284-293 (2003).Google Scholar
- Rumizen, M. C.: The complete idiot’s guide to knowledge management. Alpha Books, Indianapolis, IN (2002).Google Scholar
- Saint-Onge, H., and Wallace, D.: Leveraging communities of practice for strategic advantage. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington: MA (2003).Google Scholar
- Strauss, A.: A social world perspective. Studies in symbolic interactions, 1(1), 119-128 (1978).Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., and Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks: CA (1998).Google Scholar
- Su, N., Wilensky, H., Redmiles, D., and Mark, G.: The gospel of knowledge management in and out of a professional community. Proc. ACM Conf. Supporting Group Work GROUP’ 07, 196-207 (2007).Google Scholar
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. M.: Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002).Google Scholar