Skip to main content

Completing the Continuum of Schoolwide Positive behavior Support: Wraparound as a Tertiary-Level Intervention

  • Chapter
Handbook of Positive Behavior Support

Abstract

Positive behavior support (PBS) is based on the core belief that all children can learn and succeed, and that schools, in partnership with families and communities, are responsible to identify and arrange the physical, social, and educational conditions that ensure learning. However, many schools find this to be a daunting task (Brown & Michaels, 2006; Hawken & O'Neill, 2006), especially with regard to students who have complex emotional-behavioral needs. Special education, although intended to be a support system for these students, often functions as an exclusionary default, with limited social and academic success (National Center for Education Statistics, 2005; Wagner, Newman, Cameto, Levine, & Garza, 2006). Improving educational outcomes for all students requires significant changes in how schools respond to students with complex needs, including application of research-based behavioral practices, and integration of community/family supports with school-based services.

As described in previous chapters, application of PBS schoolwide is expected to improve schools' capacity to effectively educate the 1 –15% of students with emotional-behavioral and related learning challenges. We propose that the family-centered wraparound process (Burns & Goldman, 1999) is an essential component of schoolwide positive behavior support (SW-PBS) if schools are to ensure success for students who require comprehensive mental health supports. The wraparound approach provides a structure for schools to establish proactive partnership with families and community supports, a necessary component for arranging successful environments around students with complex emotional-behavioral needs. Families (including the student) are positioned as key informants and decision makers in prioritizing desired outcomes and strength-based strategies. Embracing such person-/family-centered values and techniques, the wraparound process results in uniquely tailored interventions that are carefully implemented with families and teachers in lead roles, ensuring contextual fit (Albin, Lucyshyn, Horner, & Flannery, 1996; Crone & Horner, 2003) and therefore increasing likelihood of effectiveness across home, school, and community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C.T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross informant correlations for situation specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agosta, J., Bradley, V., Taub, S., Melda, K., Taylor, M., Kimmich, M., et al. (1999). The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Self-Determination Initiative: Year one impact assessment report. Cambridge, MA: Human Services Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Albin, R. W., Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., & Flannery, K. B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans, In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community(pp. 81–98). Baltimore: Brookes

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. I., & Petr, C. G. (1998). Rethinking family-centered practice. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brofenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F., & Michaels, C. A. (2006). School-wide positive behavior support initiatives and students with severe disabilities: A time for reflection. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., Suter, J. C., Leverentz-Brady, K., & Force, M. M. (2004). Assessing fidelity to a community based treatment for youth: The wraparound fidelity index. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Suter, J. C., Force, M. M., & Burchard, J. D. (2005). Adherence to wraparound principles and association with outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J. D., Bruns, E. J., & Burchard, S. N. (2002). The wraparound approach. In B. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Costello, E. J., Angold, A., Tweed, D., Stangl, D., Farmer, E. M. Z., et al. (1995). Children's mental health service use across service sectors. Health Affairs, 14, 147–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., & Goldman, S. K. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of Care: Promising Practices in Children's Mental Health, 1998 Series(Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Goldman, S. K., Faw, L., & Burchard, J. D. (1999). The wraparound evidence base. In B. J. Burns & S. K. Goldman (Eds.), Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health, 1998 series(Vol. 4, pp. 95–118). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G. (2006). SWPBS: The greatest good for the greatest number, or the needs of the majority trump the needs of the minority? Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 54–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E., Scholle, S. H., Mulvey, E., & Kelleher, K. J. (2005). Predicting first time involvement in the juvenile justice system among emotionally disturbed youth receiving mental health services. Psychological Services, 2, 28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D., Malloy, J., & Hagner, D. (1998). Finishing high school in many different ways: Project RENEW in Manchester, New Hampshire. Effective School Practices, 17, 45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J., & Welkowitz, J. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of project wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 241–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, J. E., Mastillo, S., Erkanli, A., Keeler, G., & Angold, A. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 837–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, D., & Farrell, A.F. (2006). Individualized behavioral supports at 15 years: It's still lonely at the top. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: A critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 483–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, D., & Cook, T. J. (1980). Avoiding type III error in program evaluation: Results from a field experiment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 3, 269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L. (1994). The wraparound approach. Illinois School Research and Development Journal, 30, 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L. (2003). The art and science of wraparound: Completing the continuum of schoolwide behavioral support. Bloomington, IN: Forum on Education at Indiana University

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L. (2005). Wraparound: Description and case example. In G. Sugai & R. Horner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy: Educational applications (pp. 1601–1605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., & Hyde, K. (2006). Integrating data-based decision into the wraparound process within a system of school-wide positive behavior supports (PBS). Summary of conference proceedings for the 18th Annual Research Conference for Children's Mental Health, Tampa, FL, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., & Keenan, S. (2004). Collaboration with other agencies: Wraparound and systems of care for children and youths with emotional and behavioral disorders. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, and S. R. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders(pp. 502–516). New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., & Nelson, C. M. (1997). School-based wraparound planning: Integrating services for students with emotional and behavioral needs. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 385–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., & Osuch, R. (1995). Bringing the wraparound approach to school: A model for inclusion. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), The seventh annual research conference proceedings. A system of care for children's mental health: Expanding the research base(pp. 143–151). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., Osuch, R., & Rolf, K. (1996). School-based wraparound: How implementation and evaluation can lead to system change. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), The eighth annual research conference proceedings. A system of care for children's mental health: Expanding the research base(pp. 143–147). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L., Palmer, T., & Pacchiano, D. (2003). School-wide positive behavior systems: Improving school environments for all students including those with EBD. Summary of conference proceedings for the 14th Annual Research Conference for Children's Mental Health, Tampa, FL, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., McKelvey, J., Frankenberry, E., Hardy, R., & Dennis, K. (1998). Reliability of the Wraparound Observation Form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., Eber, L., Anderson, C., Irvin, L., Horner, R., Bounds, M., et al. (2006). Building inclusive school cultures using school-wide positive behavior support: Designing effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. M., Katz-Levy, J. W., & Manderschied, R. W. (1996) Prevalence of serious emotional disturbance in children and adolescents. In R. W. Manderschied & M. A. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Mental health, United States 1996. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Sciences, 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, L. S., & O'Neill, R. E. (2006). Including students with severe disabilities in all levels of school-wide positive behavior support. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. (2003). Building upon the theory of change for systems for care, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Todd, A. W., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L. K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J. B. (2004). The School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Kamradt, B., October (1996). The 25 kid project: How Milwaukee utilized a pilot project to achieve buy-in among stakeholders in changing the system of care for children with severe emotional problems. Paper presented to the Washington Business Group on Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendziora, K., Bruns, E., Osher, D., Pacchiano, D., & Mejia, B.(2001). Systems of care promising practices in children's mental health, 2001 series(Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Institute for Research, Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D., & Fox, L. (2002). Person-centered planning and positive behavior support. In S. Holburn & P. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research, practice, and future directions(pp. 29–49). Baltimore: Brookes

    Google Scholar 

  • Knitzer, J. (1982). Unclaimed children: The failure of public responsibility to children and adolescents in need of mental health services. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., & Lynn, N. (2006). School-based mental health: An empirical guide for decision-makers. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-Risk, 10, 333–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Palmer, T., Sugai, G., & Larson, S. (1999). Using data to guide decisions about program implementation and effectiveness. Effective School Practices, 17, 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, J. M., Cheney, D., & Cormier, G. M. (1998). Interagency collaboration and the transition to adulthood for students with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 303–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, P., Bruns, E. J., Osher, T. W., Walker, J. S., & National Wraparound Initiative Advisory Group. (2006). The wraparound process user's guide: A handbook for families. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health, Portland State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, R. L. (1998). The ecology of troubled children. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasato, J. (2000). Data-based decision making in Hawaii's behavior support effort. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2006). Digest of education statistics. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/

  • O'Brien, C. L., & O'Brien, J. (2000) The origins of person-centered planning: A community of practice perspective. In S. Holburn & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research, practice, and future directions(pp. 3–27). Baltimore: Brookes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogles, B. M., Carlston, D., Hatfield, D., Melendez, G., Dowell, K., & Fields, S. A. (2006). The role of fidelity and feedback in the wraparound approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offord, D. R., Boyle, M. H., Racine, Y., Szatmari, P., Fleming, J. E., Sanford, M., et al. (1996). Integrating assessment data from multiple informants. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1078–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W, Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook(2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. B., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). Students' expectations of the future: Hopelessness as a barrier to self-determination. Mental Retardation, 36, 128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renck, K. (2005). Cross informant ratings of behavior of children and adolescents: The “gold standard.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. A., & Day, N. L. (2000). Epidemiologic considerations. In M. Hersen & R. T. Ammermans (Eds.), Advanced abnormal child psychology(2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Risley, T. (1996). Get a life! Positive behavioral intervention for challenging behavior through life arrangement and life coaching. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dun-lap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes, pp. 425–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Rones, M., & Hoagwood, K. (2000). School-based mental health services: A research review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 223–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, S. P., & Oswald, K. (2003). Positive behavior supports: Can schools reshape disciplinary practices? Exceptional Children, 69, 361–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (2001). The strengths perspective in social work practice(2nd ed.). New York: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T., & Eber, L. (2003). Functional assessment and wraparound as systemic school processes: Primary, secondary, and tertiary systems examples. Journal of Positive Behavior Supports, 5, 131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T., Nelson, C. M., & Zabala, J. (2003). Functional behavior assessment training in public schools: Facilitating systemic change. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Dulcan, M. K., Davies, M., Piacentini, J., Schwab-Stone, M. E., et al. (1996). The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): Description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 865–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strein, W., Hoagwood, K., & Cohn, A. (2003). School psychology: A public health perspective I. Prevention, populations, and systems change. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances(Rev. ed). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Discipline and behavioral support: Preferred processes and practices. Effective School Practices, 17, 10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A. W., & Horner, R. H. (2001). School-wide Evaluation Tool(Version 2.0). Eugene: University of Oregon, Educational and Community Supports

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general —executive summary. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, C. L. (1995). Improving evaluability through self-evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 16, 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J. (1999). History of the wraparound process. In B. J. Burns and S. K. Goldman (Eds.), Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families(Vol. 4, pp. 19–26). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institute for Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandercook, T., York, J., & Forest, M. (1989) The McGill Action Planning System (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Garza, N. (2006). An overview of findings from wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2)(NCSER 2006–3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., Bruns, E. J., VanDenBerg, J. D., Rast, J., Osher, T. W., et al., & National Wraparound Initiative Advisory Group. (2004). Phases and activities of the wraparound process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health, Portland State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. M. (2004). Practice and process in wraparound teamwork. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, J. C. (2005). Using teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At-Risk, 10, 295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Baker, D. J., Blumberg, R., & Harrison, R. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement: Innovative practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Supports, 6, 29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research, 40, 807–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eber, L., Hyde, K., Rose, J., Breen, K., McDonald, D., Lewandowski, H. (2009). Completing the Continuum of Schoolwide Positive behavior Support: Wraparound as a Tertiary-Level Intervention. In: Sailor, W., Dunlap, G., Sugai, G., Horner, R. (eds) Handbook of Positive Behavior Support. Issues in Clinical Child Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics