Skip to main content

Environmental Cooperation before and after NAFTA

  • Chapter
Economic Integration in NAFTA and the EU

Abstract

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) expanded into issues which, until some years ago, were not normally part of formal trade negotiations. One of these was environmental protection. None of the three governments initially intended to include this issue in the negotiations. However, having been incorporated into the United States’ political agenda, it was eventually accepted by the other two countries. This reluctant acceptance, in addition to US needs of reconciling opposing domestic interests, clearly anticipated the strong limits of the environmental agreements eventually reached by the parties. 7 Environmental Cooperation before and after NAFTA

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, P. and Torres, B. (1995) ‘The Politics of Environmental Cooperation: A View from Ottawa and Mexico’, mimeo, ITAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D.C. (1994) Greening the GATT. Trade Environment and the Future (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics), pp. 29, 32, 185-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.M., Keohane, R.O. and Levy, M.A. (1994) Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K.J. and Levy, T.A. (1976) ‘Bilateral Institutions and Transgovernmental Relations between Canada and the United States’, in Fox, A.B., Hero, A.O. Jr. and Nye, J.S. Jr. (eds), Canada and the United States, Transnational and Transgovernmental Relations (New York and London: Columbia University Press), pp. 282–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. and Kingsbury, B. (1992) The International Politics of the Environment (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside NAFTA, 9 August 1995, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside US Trade, 1 September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside US Trade, (1993) ‘Administration Pledges to Exit NAFTA if Side Pacts are Abandoned’, 12 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P.M. and Beaulieu, A. (1996) ‘The Environment and NAFTA; Understanding and Implementing the New Continental Law’ (Washington, DC, and California: Island Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M.E. (1993) ‘Review of the Environmental Side Agreement: Does it meet expectations?’, Frontera Norte, vol. 10, July–December, pp. 133–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lujan, S.R. (1991) ‘Working within the Legal Framework for Environmental Protection in Mexico’, paper presented at the conference Exporting Environmental Know-how Workshop, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, S. (1993) ‘NAFTA and the Future of Mexico — US Border Environmental Management’, Frontera Norte, vol. 5, July–December, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munton, D. and Kirton, J. (1996) ‘Beyond and Beneath the Nation-State: Province–State Interactions and NAFTA, paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, April

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Institute, NAMI News, issue 14, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, J.G. (1992) ‘Planning the Border’s Future: the Mexican — US Integrated Border Environmental Plan’, the University of Texas at Austin, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, US — Mexican Occasional Paper No. 1, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, R. (1991) ‘El Tratado de Libre Comercio en América del Norte y el Medio Ambiente de la Frontera Norte’, Frontera Norte, vol. 6, July–December, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretaría de Desarrollo Social, Instituto Nacional de Ecología (1994) Informe de la situación general en materia deequilibrio ecológico y protección del medio ambiente 1993–1994, Mexico, SEDESOL, Institute for International Research, 26 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, M.J. (1997) ‘Lessons of NAFTA for APEC’, Journal of Environment and Development, vol. 6(3), September, pp. 252–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, B. (1993) ‘La cuestión del medio ambiente en la agenda bilateral (1991–92)’, in G. Vega (ed.), México, Estados Unidos, Canadá, 1991–1992 (México, El Colegio de México), pp. 381–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D.G. (1993) ‘NAFTA and the Environment: Some Lessons for the Next Round of GATT Negotiations’, The World Economy, vol. 17(3), pp. 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G.R. (1994) ‘Enforcement of Environmental Measures: Negotiating the NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement’, Journal of Environment and Development, vol. 3 (1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torres, B. (1999). Environmental Cooperation before and after NAFTA. In: Appendini, K., Bislev, S. (eds) Economic Integration in NAFTA and the EU. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-99488-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics