Skip to main content
  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

Many of the post-1960s images representing the state of the Earth’s environment cast a global pall. They politicize and popularize repeated scientific warnings that the life-sustaining processes of the planet are imperilled. As a consequence, images of environmental insecurity are often projected in the International Relations (IR) discipline. But more reassuring images of ‘sustainable development’ achieved through global governance, have become increasingly prevalent. Institutions, non-state actors, and social movements are recognized and analysed as key actors for sustainable development. These images contrast again with the ecocentric but marginal images projected by ecofeminists and ‘deep’ ecologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Johanna Sutherland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutherland, J. (2000). An ‘Endangered Planet’?. In: Fry, G., O’Hagan, J. (eds) Contending Images of World Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-98553-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics