Advertisement

Demonstrating evidence-based clinical nursing practice: providing the evidence

  • Tony Long
  • Jill Asbury

Abstract

Our ability to assess practice at degree level is just as crucial as our ability to assess theory. What, it is suggested, differentiates degree-level practice is the intellectual process associated with the practice in question. A key element of the effective assessment of practice is that evidence must be collected from a range of sources. Examples of such sources that have been exploited within a programme of study are discussed, including critical incident analysis, commentary in practice, prescribed specific outcomes, the documentation of care, the observation of practice, written evidence, spontaneous discussions of practice, and extracts from a reflective diary. The process of providing and evaluating the evidence was conducted within a tripartite arrangement involving the practitioner or student, the supervising practitioner and a lecturer. The net result was an overall assessment of the degree of competence.

Keywords

National Health Service Nursing Practice Degree Level Reflective Diary Advance Nurse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akinsanya J. (1993) ‘Preparation of nurse teachers: a rethink’, Nursing Standard 8 (5): 28–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benner P. (1984) From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice, Menlo Park, CA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Clark J. (1992) ‘Nursing: an intellectual activity’, International Nursing Review 39 (2): 60.Google Scholar
  4. Commission of the European Communities (1989) Nursing Education in the 21st Century, proceedings of a symposium. Brussels, CEC.Google Scholar
  5. Corcoran S., Narayan S. and Moreland H. (1988) ‘“Thinking aloud” as a strategy to improve clinical decision making’, Heart Lung 17: 463–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Council of Europe (1994) Working Party on the Role and Education of Nurses, CDSP (94): 35, Strasbourg. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  7. Davis B. and Burnard, P. (1992) ‘Academic levels in nursing’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 17: 1395–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Health (1997) A Bridge to the Future: Nursing Standards, Education and Workforce Planning in Paediatric Intensive Care, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Elliot P. (1993) ‘Locality based teaching’, Senior Nurse 13 (2): 35–9.Google Scholar
  10. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1993) Assessment of Competencies in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Training (the ACE Project), London, ENB.Google Scholar
  11. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1994) Creating Lifelong Learners–Partnerships for Care London, ENB.Google Scholar
  12. Flanagan J. (1954) ‘The critical incident technique’, Psychological Bulletin 51(4): 327–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fonteyn M. E. and Fisher A. (1995) ‘Use of think aloud method to study nurse decision making in clinical practice settings’, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 27 (2): 121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonteyn M. E., Kuipers B. and Grobe S. J. (1993) ‘A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis’, Qualitative Health Research 3 (4): 430–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goding L. (1997) ‘Can degree level practice be assessed?’, Nurse Education Today 17 (2): 158–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hahnemann B. (1986) ‘Journal writing: a key to promoting critical thinking in nursing students’, Journal of Nursing Education 25: 213–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammersley M. and Atkinson P. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice ( 2nd edn ), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  18. International Council of Nurses (1989) Development of Standards for Nursing Education and Practice: Guidelines for National Nurses Associations, Geneva, ICN.Google Scholar
  19. Jolley M. and Allen P. (1991) Current Issues in Nursing, London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Long P. (1976) ‘Judging and reporting on student nurse clinical performance: some problems for the ward sister’, International Journal of Nursing Studies 13: 115–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyte V. and Thompson I. (1990) ‘The diary as a formative teaching and learning aid incorporating means of evaluation and renegotiation of clinical learning objectives’, Nurse Education Today 10: 228–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. NHS Executive (1996) Promoting Clinical Effectiveness: A Framework for Action in and through the NHS, London, DoH.Google Scholar
  23. NHS Executive (1997) The New NHS: Modern, Dependable, Cmnd 3807, London, DoH.Google Scholar
  24. NHS Executive (1998a) Integrating Theory and Practice in Nursing, London, DoH.Google Scholar
  25. NHS Executive (1998b) A First Class Service, London, DoH.Google Scholar
  26. Richardson G. and Hendrika M. (1995) ‘Reflection-on-practice: enhancing student learning’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 22 (2): 235–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Royal College of Nursing (1996) A Principled Approach to Nurse Education, London, RCN.Google Scholar
  28. Schön D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, London, Falmer.Google Scholar
  29. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting (1994) The Future of Professional Practice–The Council’s Standards for Education and Practice Following Registration, London, UKCC.Google Scholar
  30. Wong J. (1979) ‘The inability to transfer classroom learning to clinical nursing practice: a learning problem and its remedial plan’, Journal of Advanced Nursing 4 (2): 161–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Further reading

  1. English National Board for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting (1993) A Detailed Study of the Relationships between Teaching, Support, Supervision and Role Modelling for Students in Clinical Areas, within the Context of Project 2000 Courses, Research Highlights 3, London, ENB.Google Scholar
  2. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1994) Researching Professional Education: Education, Dialogue and Assessment: Creating Partnership for Improving Practice, London, ENB.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Long
  • Jill Asbury

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations