Skip to main content

The Semiotics of Death and its Medical Implications

  • Conference paper
Brain Death and Disorders of Consciousness

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 550))

Abstract

In any discussion pertaining to this world, human beings are bound to the medium of language. We are often unaware of the degree to which language, as the physical shape of all thought, exerts its influence on the distinctions we make and consequently on the formation of our notions and ideas. The way we think shapes the way we speak, but also conversely, the language we speak shapes the thoughts we think. The languages we live in are the result of all preceding evolution of thought, cultural interaction and the communication thereof within a linguistic community, already presenting us with a preformed way of structuring and interpreting the world (Weltanschauung) at the time of primary language acquisition. We are not able to step out of the medium of language, but we are able to step out of one particular language into another, thereby critically evaluating the distinctions, terms and notions we usually take for granted. Surprising new perspectives open up on seemingly well-known objects of debate, and from the meta-linguistic point of view, more often than not what appeared to be a problem on the object level turns out to be an inherent feature of the language we use to discuss it. A case in point is the phenomenon called death.

Die Grenzen meiner Sprache bedeuten die Grenzen meiner Welt.

[The limits of my language signify the limits of my world.]

(Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 5.6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernat JL, Culver CM, Gen B. On the definition and criterion of death. Ann Intern Med 1981;94(3):389394.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shewmon DA. “Brain-stem death”, “brain death” and death: a critical re-evaluation of the purported evidence. Issues Law Med 1998;14(2):125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seifert J. What is Life? The Originality, Irreducibility, and Value of Life. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schrödinger E. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korein J. The problem of brain death: development and history. Ann N YAcad Sci 1978; 315: 19–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shewmon DA. “Brain death”: a valid theme with invalid variations, blurred by semantic ambiguity. In: White RI, Angstwurm H, Carrasco de Paula I, eds. Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death. 10–14 December, 1989. (Scripta Varia 83). Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1992: 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shewmon DA. The brain and somatic integration: insights into the standard biological rationale for equating “brain death” with death. J Med Philos 2001; 26 (5): 457–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Veatch RM. The conscience clause: how much individual choice in defining death can our society tolerate? In: Youngner SJ, Amold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morison RS. Death: Process or event? Science 1971; 173: 694–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kass LR. Death as an event: a commentary on Robert Morison. Attempts to blur the distinction between a man alive and a man dead are both unsound and dangerous. Science 1971; 173: 698–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. . Emanuel LL. Reexamining death: the asymptotic model and a bounded zone definition. Hastings Cent Rep 1995; 25 (4): 27–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Varela FJ. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: North Holland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hilbom RC. Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics. An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aihara K, Matsumoto G. Chaotic oscillations and bifurcations in squid giant axons. In: Holden AV, ed. Chaos. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garfinkel A. A mathematics for physiology. Am J Physiol 1983; 245 (Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 14): R455 - R466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garfinkel A, Chen P-S, Walter DO, Karagueuzian HS, Kogan B, Evans SJ, Karpoukhin M, Hwang C, Uchida T, Gotoh M, Nwasokwa O, Sager P, Weiss JN. Quasiperiodicity and chaos in cardiac fibrillation. J Clin Invest 1997; 99 (2): 305–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Glass L, Guevara MR, Shrier A, Perez R. Bifurcation and chaos in a periodically stimulated cardiac oscillator. Physica 1983; 7D: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strogatz SH. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Botne R. To die across languages: Toward a typology of achievement verbs. Linguistic Typology 2003; 7 (2): 233–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DuBois. Non-heart-beating organ donation: A defense of the required determination of death. J Law Med Ethics1999; 27: 126–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fortescue M. West Geenlandic. London: Croom Helm, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lynn J, Cranford R. The persisting perplexities in the determination of death. In: Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Potts M, Byrne PA, Nilges RG. Beyond Brain Death. The Case Against Brain Based Criteria for Human Death. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singer P. Rethinking Life & Death. The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosner F. Modern Medicine and Jewish Ethics. New York: Yeshiva University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosner F. The definition of death in Jewish law. In: Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steinberg A. Ethical issues in nephrology - Jewish perspectives.Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11: 961963.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yofe YA, Mark Y. Groyser verterbukh fun der yidisher shprakh. New York: Komitet faro Groysn Verterbukh fun der Yidisher Shprakh, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cole DJ. The reversibility of death. J Med Ethics 1992;18(1):26–30; discussion 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lynn J. Are the patients who become organ donors under the Pittsburgh protocol for “non-heart-beating donors” really dead? In: Arnold RM, Youngner SJ, Schapiro R, Spicer CM, eds. Procuring Organs for Transplant: The Debate over Non-Heart-Beating Cadaver Protocols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995: 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tomlinson T. The irreversibility of death: reply to Cole. In: Arnold RM, Youngner SJ, Schapiro R, Spicer CM, eds. Procuring Organs for Transplant: The Debate over Non-Heart-Beating Cadaver Protocols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cole D. Statutory definitions of death and the management of terminally ill patients who may become donors. In: Arnold RM, Youngner SJ, Schapiro R, Spicer CM, eds. Procuring Organs for Transplant:The Debate over Non-Heart-Beating Cadaver Protocols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995: 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shewmon DA. Spinal shock and ‘brain death’: somatic pathophysiological equivalence and implications for the integrative-unity rationale. Spinal Cord 1999; 37 (5): 313–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bernat JL. How much of the brain must die in brain death? JClin Ethics 1992;3(1):21–26; discussion 2728.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bernat JL. A defense of the whole-brain concept of death. Hastings Cent Rep 1998; 28 (2): 14–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pritchard ET. No Word for Time: The Way of the Algonquin People. Tulsa, OK: Council Oak Books, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cook JA. The Hebrew verb: a grammaticalization approach. Zeitschrift far Althebraistik (Stuttgart) 2001; 14 (2): 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Berlin B, Kay P. Universality and Evolution of Basic Color Terms. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Laboratory for Language-Behavior Research, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elliot E. Through Gates of Splendor. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shewmon DA. Recovery from “brain death”: A neurologist’s Apologia. Linacre Q 1997; 64 (1): 30–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shewmon DA. Chronic “brain death”: meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. Neurology 1998; 51 (6): 1538–1545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shewmon DA. Chronic “brain death”: meta-analysis and conceptual consequences [response to letters]. Neurology 1999; 53 (6): 1369–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Penrose R. The Emperor’s New Mind. New York: Penguin Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brody BA. How much of the brain must be dead? In: Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fost N. The unimportance of death. In: Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, eds. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999: 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Halevy A. Beyond brain death? J Med Philos 2001; 26 (5): 493–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Halevy A, Brody B. Brain death: reconciling definitions, criteria, and tests. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119 (6): 519–525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Veatch RM. Death, Dying, and the Biological Revolution: Our Last Quest for Responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM. Philosophical debates about the definition of death: Who cares? J Med Philos 2001; 26 (5): 527–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Truog RD. Is it time to abandon brain death? Hastings Cent Rep 1997; 27 (1): 29–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Truog RD, Robinson WM. Role of brain death and the dead-donor rule in the ethics of organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (9): 2391–2396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. DuBois JM. Is organ procurement causing the death of patients? Issues Law Med 2002; 18 (1): 21–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Menikoff J. The importance of being dead: Non-heart-beating organ donation. Issues Law Med 2002; 18 (1): 3–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Castelnuovo-Tedesco P. Cardiac surgeons look at transplantation–interviews with Drs. Cleveland, Cooley, DeBakey, Hallman and Rochelle. Semin Psychiatry 1971; 3 (1): 5–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lock M. Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Youngner SJ, Allen M, Bartlett ET, Cascorbi HF, Hau T, Jackson DL, Mahowald MB, Martin BJ. Psychosocial and ethical implications of organ retrieval. N Engl J Med 1985; 313 (5): 321–324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Arnold RM, Youngner SJ, Schapiro R, Spicer CM. Procuring organs for transplant: the debate over nonheart-beating cadaver protocols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shewmon, D.A., Shewmon, E.S. (2004). The Semiotics of Death and its Medical Implications. In: Machado, C., Shewmon, D.A. (eds) Brain Death and Disorders of Consciousness. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 550. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48526-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48526-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48526-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics