Becoming Big Frogs in a Small Pond

On Gaining Eminence in Comparative Psychology
Part of the Path in Psychology book series (PATH)


We must never forget that the successful spread of a piece of research or theory depends in part on its perceived quality within the context of the science in which it is done. That said, many other factors can affect success. These are summarized in Table 1 and include characteristics of the scientist, the research or idea, and of its presentation and promotion. Scientific acumen is important but so is good salesmanship.


Nobel Prize American Psychologist Rockefeller Foundation Small Pond Comparative Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beach, F. A. (1948). Hormones and behavior. New York: Hoeber.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, F. A. (1950). The snark was a boojum. American Psychologist, 5, 15–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach, F. A. (1969). Locks and beagles. American Psychologist, 24, 971–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach, F. A. (1976). Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals. Hormones and Behavior, 7, 105–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (1977). The Psychological Round Table: Revolution of 1936. American Psychologist, 32, 542–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coon, D. J. (1982). Eponymy, obscurity, Twitmyer, and Pavlov. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18, 255–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, H., & Balfour, D. (1992). The inevitable bond: Examining scientist-animal interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewsbury, D. A. (1993). On publishing controversy: Norman R. F. Maier and the genesis of seizures. American Psychologist, 48, 869–877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewsbury, D. A. (1994). The comparative psychology of Paul Schiller. Psychological Record, 44, 326–350.Google Scholar
  11. Dewsbury, D. A. (1997). Rhetorical strategies in the presentation of ethology and comparative psychology in magazines after World War II. Science in Context, 10, 367–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewsbury, D. A. (1998). Robert Yerkes, sex research, and the problem of data simplification. History of Psychology, 1, 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewsbury, D. A. (2000). Comparative cognition in the 1930s. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewsbury, D. A. (2002) The Chicago five: A family of integrative psychobiologists. History of Psychology 5, 16–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewsbury, D. A. (2002). Comparative psychology: A case study of development of support for basic research by a Federal agency with an applied mission 1948–1963. InW. E. Pickren & S. F. Schneider (Eds.) Psychology ant the National Institute of Mental Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, in press.Google Scholar
  16. Eakin, E. (2001, February 3). No longer alone: The scientist who dared to say animals think. New York Times, p. xx.Google Scholar
  17. Gluck, J. P. (1984). Harry Harlow: Lessons on explanations, ideas, and mentorship. American Journal of Primatology, 7, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin, D. R. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harlow, H. F., Harlow, M. K., & Suomi, S. J. (1971). From thought to therapy: Lessons from a primate laboratory. American Scientist, 59, 538–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazar, J. W. (1974). A comparison of some theoretical proposals of J. R. Kantor and T. C. Schneirla. Psychological Record, 24, 177–190.Google Scholar
  24. Liss, C. (2002). Forcibly breaking the maternal bond. AWI Quarterly, 51(2), 8–9.Google Scholar
  25. Lockard, R. B. (1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology: Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macphail, E. M. (1985). Vertebrate intelligence: The null hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 308B, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maier, N. R. F. (1960). Maier’s law. American Psychologist, 15, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McConnell, J. V. (1965). A manual of psychological experimentation on planarians. Ann Arbor, MI: J. V. McConnell.Google Scholar
  29. McConnell, J. V. (1969). Confessions of a scientific humorist. Impact of Science on Society, 19, 241–252.Google Scholar
  30. McCulloch, T. L. (1939). The role of clasping activity in adaptive behavior of the infant chimpanzee: I, II, & III. Journal of Psychology, 7, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rilling, M. (1996). The mystery of vanished citations: James McConnell’s forgotten 1960s quest for planarian learning, a biochemical engram, and celebrity. American Psychologist, 51, 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rumbaugh, D. M. (1997). The psychology of Harry F. Harlow: A bridge from radical to rational behaviorism. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sperry, R. W. (1988). Psychology’s mentalist paradigm and the religion/science tension. American Psychologist, 43, 607–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tinbergen, N. Watching and wondering. (1985). In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.) Leaders in the Study of Animal Behavior: Autobiographical perspectives (pp. 431–463). Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Travis, D. (1980). On the construction of creativity: The ‘memory transfer’ phenomenon and the importance of being earnest. In K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.) The social process of scientific investigation: Sociology of the sciences v. 4 (pp. 165–193). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  38. Veldink, C. (1989). The honey-bee language controversy. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 14, 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. von Frisch, K. (1950). Bees: Their vision, chemical senses, and language. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. NewYork: Hafner.Google Scholar
  43. Yerkes, R. M. (1943). Chimpanzees: A laboratory colony. New Haven, CT: Yale University Pres.Google Scholar
  44. Yoerg, S. I. (1992). Mentalist imputations. Science, 258, 830–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations