Tracking Trends in Psychological Science

An Empirical Analysis of the History of Psychology
Part of the Path in Psychology book series (PATH)


Journal Citation Report Citation Impact Social Science Citation Index Psychological Science Dominant Paradigm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amaral, D. G. (2002). The primate amygdala and the neurobiology of social behavior: Implications for understanding social anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 11–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of science: An overview for cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Briskman, L. B. (1972). Is a Kuhnian analysis applicable to psychology? Science Studies, 2, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cermak sees big role for neuropsychology. (1996, July). APA Monitor, p. 12.Google Scholar
  7. Crews, F. (1996). The verdict on Freud. Psychological Science, 7, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., & Beach, L. R. (1984). The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgement and decision literature. American Psychologist, 39, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  10. Churchland, P. S. (1998, March). Ten unsolved problems in neuroscience. Paper presented at the Science of Mind Distinguished Lecture Series, University of California, Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, R. J. (2001). The neural circuitry of emotion and affective style: Prefrontal cortex and amygdala contributions. Social Science Information, 40, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1909/1955). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. In Standard Edition (Vol. 9). London, UK: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L. E., & Larzelere, R. (1993). Changes in modern psychology: A citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48, 658–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L. E., & Larzelere, R. (2000). Questionable validity, not vitality. American Psychologist, 55, 274–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing—its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Gholson, B., & Barker, P. (1985). Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibson, K. R. (2000). Corroboration. American Psychologist, 55, 271–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  21. Hunt, M. (1993). The story of psychology. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Kendler, H. H. (1987). Historical foundations of modern psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kihlstrom, J. F. (Ed.) (1994). Psychodynamics and social cognition: Perspectives on the representation and processing of emotionally significant information [Special Issue]. Journal of Personality, 62(4).Google Scholar
  24. Kimble, G. A. (2000). Behaviorism and unity in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 208–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosslyn, S. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Davidson, R. J., Hugdahl, K., Lovallo, W. R., Spiegel, D., & Rose, R. (2002). Bridging psychology and biology: The analysis of individuals in groups. American Psychologist, 57, 341–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Öhman, A. (2000). Fear and anxiety: Animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 137–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Leahey, T. H. (1991). A history of modern psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. Leigland, S. (2000). On cognitivism and behaviorism. American Psychologist, 55, 273–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000). Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pierce, W. D. (1996). Behavior analysis is alive and well. Contemporary Psychology, 41, 461.Google Scholar
  38. Plomin, R. (1997, May). Let’s not give away DNA. APA Monitor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Robins, R. W., & Craik, K. H. (1993). Is there a citation bias in the judgment and decision literature? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robins, R. W., & Craik, K. H. (1994). A more appropriate test of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 49, 815–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salzinger, K. 1994. The one with the most citations wins. American Psychologist 49:816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schultz, D. (1981). A history of modern psychology, 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Slife, B. D., & Burchfield, C. M. (2002). The virtues and vices of biologizing psychology. Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 47, 250–252.Google Scholar
  46. Social Sciences Citation Index: Journal Citation Reports (1977–2001). Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
  47. Sperry, R. W. 1988. Psychology’s mentalist paradigm and the religion/science tension. American Psychologist, 43:606–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Squire, L. R. 1997 (April). A partnership between psychology and neuroscience. APA Monitor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  49. Tagler, M. J. (2000). Neuroscience and mainstream psychology. American Psychologist, 55, 271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teo, T., & Febbraro, A. R. (2002). Attribution errors in the postmodern landscape. American Psychologist, 57, 458–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warren, N. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Doubts and reservations. Science Studies, 4, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watson, R. I. (1977). The historical background for national trends in psychology: The United States. In J. Brozek, & R. B. Evans (Eds.), R. I. Watson’s selected papers on the history of psychology (pp. 83–94). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  53. Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 333–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson, E. O. (1999, August). Consilience: Psychology at the crossroads. Invited presentation at the 107th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  55. Wolpe, J., & Rachman, S. (1960). Psychoanalytic “evidence”: A critique based on Freud’s case of Little Hans. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 130, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuckerman, M. (1999). Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations