Abstract
Role playing can be used to forecast decisions, such as “how will our competitors respond if we lower our prices?” In role playing, an administrator asks people to play roles and uses their “decisions” as forecasts. Such an exercise can produce a realistic simulation of the interactions among conflicting groups. The role play should match the actual situation in key respects, such as that role players should be somewhat similar to those being represented in the actual situations, and roleplayers should read instructions for their roles before reading about the situation. Role playing is most effective for predictions when two conflicting parties respond to large changes. A review of the evidence showed that role playing was effective in matching results for seven of eight experiments. In five actual situations, role playing was correct for 56 percent of 143 predictions, while unaided expert opinions were correct for 16 percent of 172 predictions. Role playing has also been used successfully to forecast outcomes in three studies. Successful uses of role playing have been claimed in the military, law, and business.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, J. S. (1977), “Social irresponsibility in management,” Journal of Business Research, 5, 185–213. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast.
Armstrong, J. S. (1987), “Forecasting methods for conflict situations,” in G. Wright and P. Ayton (eds.), Judgmental Forecasting, pp. 157–176. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast.
Armstrong, J. S. and P. D. Hutcherson (1989), “Predicting the outcome of marketing negotiations,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6, 227–239.
Ashton, R. H. and S. S. Krammer (1980), “Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence,” Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 1–16.
Babcock, L., G. Lowenstein, S. Issacharoff and C. Camerer (1995), “Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining,” American Economic Review, 85, 1337–1343.
Borman, W. C. (1982), “Validity of behavioral assessment for predicting military recruiter performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 3–9.
Brandenburger, A. M. and B. J. Nalebuff (1996), Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
Brief, A. P., J. M. Dukerich and L. I. Doran (1991), “Resolving ethical dilemmas in management: Experimental investigations of values, accountability, and choice,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 380–396.
Busch, G. A. (1961), “Prudent-manager forecasting,” Harvard Business Review, 39, 57–64.
Carroll, J. S., M. H. Bazerman and R. Maury (1988), “Negotiator cognition: A descriptive approach to negotiators’ understanding of their opponents,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 41, 352–370.
Cooper, R. (1977), “Shadow jury used by IBM at hearings in big anti-trust case,” The Wall Street Journal, 3 February, 7.
Cyert, R. M., J. G. March and W. H. Starbuck (1961), “Two experiments on bias and conflict in organizational estimation,” Management Science, 7, 254–264.
Elstein, A. S., L. S. Shulman and S. A. Sprafka (1978), Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gerbasi, K. C., M. Zuckerman and H. T. Reis (1977), “Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, 323–345.
Goldhamer, H. and H. Speier (1959), “Some observations on political gaming,” World Politics, 12, 71–83.
Greenberg, M.S. (1967), “Role playing: An alternative to deception,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 152–157.
Greenwood, J. D. (1983), “Role playing as an experimental strategy in social psychology,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 235–254.
Halberstam, D. (1973), The Best and the Brightest. London: Barrie and Jenkins. Hartley, R. F. (1989), Marketing Mistakes. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley.
Holmes, D. S. and D. H. Bennett (1974), “Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 358–367.
Horowitz, I. A. and B. H. Rothschild (1970), “Conformity as a function of deception and role playing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 224–226.
Houston, B. K. and D. S. Holmes (1975), “Role playing versus deception: The ability of subjects to simulate self-report and physiological responses,” Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 91–98.
Janis, I. L. and L. Mann (1965), “Effectiveness of emotional role playing in modifying smoking habits and attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 84–90.
Kadden, R. M., M. D. Litt, N. L. Cooney and D. A. Busher (1992), “Relationship between role-play measures of coping skills and alcohol treatment outcome,” Addictive Behavior, 17, 425–437.
Kerr, N. L., D. R. Nerenz and D. Herrick (1979), “Role playing and the study of jury behavior,” Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 337–355.
Kipper, D. A. and D. Har-Even (1984), “Role-playing techniques: The differential effect of behavior simulation interventions on the readiness to inflict pain,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 936–941.
Leeds, J. P. and W. Burroughs (1997), “Finding the right stuff,” Security Management, March, 32–43.
Locke, E. A. (1986), Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
Mandel, R. (1977), “Political gaming and foreign policy making during crises,” World Politics, 29, 610–625.
Messe, L. A. and J. M. Sivacek (1979), “Predictions of others’ responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 602–607.
Milgram, S. (1974), Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row.
Mixon, D. (1972), “Instead of deception,” Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 2, 145–177.
Morwitz, V. G. (2001), “Methods for forecasting from intentions data,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Moynihan, P. (1987), “Expert gaming: A means to investigate the executive decisionprocess,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38, 215–231.
O’Leary, C. J., F. N. Willis and E. Tomich (1970), “Conformity under deceptive and nondeceptive techniques,” Sociological Quarterly, 11, 87–93.
Orne, M. T., P. W. Sheehan and F. J. Evans (1968), “Occurrence of post-hypnotic behavior outside the experimental setting,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 189–196.
Randall, E. J., E. F. Cooke and L. Smith (1985), “A successful application of the assessment center concept to the salesperson selection process,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 5, No. 1, 53–61.
Rowe, G. and G. Wright (2001), “Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi
technique,“ in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting,Norwell, MA: Kluwer. Statman, M. and T. T. Tyebjee (1985), ”Optimistic capital budgeting forecasts: An experiment,“ Financial Management (Autumn), 27–33.
Tamblyn, R., M. Abrahamowicz, B. Schnarch, J.A. Colliver, B.S. Benaroya and L. Snell (1994), “Can standardized patients predict real-patient satisfaction with the doctorpatient relationship?” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 36–44.
Willis, R. H. and Y. A. Willis (1970), “Role playing versus deception: An experimental comparison,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 472–477.
Zimbardo, P. (1972), “The pathology of imprisonment,” Society, 9 (April), 4–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, J.S. (2001). Role Playing: A Method to Forecast Decisions. In: Armstrong, J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7401-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47630-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive