Abstract
At present most forensic databases of DNA profiling of individuals consist of DNA fragment sizes measured from Southern blot restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Statistical studies of these databases have revealed that, when fragment sizes are measured from RFLP analysis, some of the single-band patterns of individuals may actually be due to heterozygosity of alleles in which fragment size resulting from one allele remains undetected. In this work, we evaluate the effect of such allelic non-detectability on correlation of fragment sizes within individuals at a locus, and its impact on the inference of independence of fragment sizes within loci. We show that when non-detectable alleles are present in a population at a locus, positive correlations of fragment sizes are expected, which increase with the proportion of non-detectable alleles at the locus. Therefore, a non-zero positive correlation is not a proof of allelic dependence within individuals. Applications of this theory to the current forensic RFLP databases within the US show that there is virtually no evidence of significant allelic dependence within any of the loci. Therefore, the assumption that DNA fragment sizes within loci are independent is valid, and hence, the population genetic principles of computing DNA profile frequencies by multiplying binned frequencies of fragment sizes are most likely to be appropriate for forensic applications of DNA typing data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Budowle, B., A.M. Giusti, J.S. Waye, F.S. Baechtel, R.M. Fourney, D.E. Adams, L.A. Presley, H.A. Dcadman and K.L. Monson, 1991a. Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic computations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 841–855.
Budowle, B., K.L. Monson, K.S. Anoe, F.S. Baechtel, D.L. Bergman, E. Buel, P.A. Campbell, M.E. Clement, H.W. Coey, L.A. Davis, A. Dixon, P. Fish, A.M. Giusti, T.L. Grant, T.M. Gronert, D.M. Hoover, L. Jankowski, A.J. Kilgore, W. Kimoto, W.H. Landrum, H. Leone, A.J. Longwell, D.C. MacLaren, L.E. Medlin, S.D. Narveson, M.L. Piarson, J.M. Polloack, R.J. Raquel, J.M. Reznicek, G.S. Rogers, J.E. Smerick and R.M. Thompson, 199 lb. A preliminary report on binned general population data on six VNTR loci in Caucasians, Blacks and Hispanics from the United States. Crime Lab. Digest 18: 9–26.
Callen, D.F., A.D. Thompson, Y. Shen, H.A. Phillips, R.I. Richards, J.C. Mulley and Sutherland, G.R., 1993. Incidence and origin of `null’ alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52: 922–927.
Chakraborty, R., 1991. Statistical interpretation of DNA typing data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 895–897.
Chakraborty, R., M. de Andrade, S.P. Daiger and B. Budowle, 1992. Apparent heterozygote deficiencies observed in DNA typing dataand their implications in forensic applications. Ann. Hum. Genet. 56: 45–57.
Chakraborty, R. and L. Jin, 1992. Heterozygote deficiency, population substructure and their implications in DNA fingerprinting. Hum. Genet. 88: 267–272.
Chakraborty, R. and L. Jin, 1993. A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. In DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science. pp. 153–175. ed by S.D.J. Pena, R.
Chakraborty, J.T. Epplen and A.J. Jeffreys. Birkhauser, Basel. Chakraborty, R. and K.K. Kidd, 1991. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254: 1735–1739.
Chakraborty, R., M.R. Srinivasan and M. de Andrade, 1993. Intraclass and interclass correlations of allele sizes within and between loci in DNA typing data. Genetics 133: 411–419.
Chakraborty, R., Y. Zhong, L. Jin and B. Budowle. 1994. Nondetectability of restriction fragments and independence of DNA-fragment sizes within and between loci in RFLP typing of DNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55: 391–401.
Cohen, J.E., 1990. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: potential effects on data interpretation of subpopulation of heterogeneity and band number variability. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46: 358–368.
Devlin, B. and N. Risch, 1992. A note on Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of VNTR data by using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s fixed-bin method. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 549–553.
Devlin, B. and N. Risch, 1993. Physical properties of VNTR data, and their impact on a test of allelic independence. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 324–329.
Devlin, B., N. Risch and K. Roeder, 1990. No excess of homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting. Science 249: 1416–1420.
Gart, J.J. and J. Nam, 1984. A score test for the possible presence of recessive alleles in generalized ABO-like genetic systems. Biometrics 40: 887–894.
Gart, J.J. and J. Nam, 1988. The equivalence of two tests and models for HLA data with no observed double blanks. Biometrics 44: 869–873.
Geisser, S. and W. Johnson, 1992. Testing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium on allelic data from VNTR loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 1084–1088.
Geisser, S. and W. Johnson, 1993. Testing independence of fragment lengths within VNTR loei. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 1103–1106.
Imanishi, T., T. Akaza, A. Kimura, K. Tokunaga and T. Gojobori, 1992. Allele and haplotype frequencies for HLA and complement loci in various ethnic groups. In: HLA 1991, Vol. 1. pp. 1065–1220. ed. by K. Tsuji, M. Aizawa and T. Sasazuki. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
Jeffreys, A.J., M. Turner and P. Dabenham, 1991. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprinting probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 824–840.
Karlin, S., E.C. Cameron and P.T. Williams, 1981. Sibling and parent-offspring correlation estimation with variable family size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 2664–2668.
Koorey, D.J., G.A. Bishop and G.W. McCaughan, 1993. Allele non-amplification: a source of confusion in linkage studies employing microsatellite polymorphisms. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2: 289–291.
Lander, E.S., 1989. DNA fingerprinting on trial. Nature 339: 501–505.
Lander, E.S., 1991. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom applications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 819–823.
Lewontin, R.C. and D.L. Hartl, 1991. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science 254: 1745–1750.
National.Pesaareb.0 uucil,NF.C.t. 1997 LMAT:cbnnlnagjn.Frmen sic Science. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Rao, C.R., 1973. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Wiley, New York.
Risch, N. and B. Devlin, 1992. On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints. Science 255: 717–720.
Robertson, A. and W.G. Hill, 1984. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients, Genetics 107: 703–718.
Steinberger, E.M., L.D. Thompson and J.M. Hartmann, 1993. On the use of excess homozygosity for subpopulation detection. Mn. J. Hum. Genet. 52: 1275–1277.
G. Tully, K.M. Sullivan and P. Gill. 1993. Analysis of 6 VNTR loci by `multiplex’ PCR and automated fluorescent detection. Hum. Genet. 92: 554–562.
Weir, B.S., 1992a. Independence of VNTR alleles defined as fixed bins. Genetics 130: 873–887.
Weir, B.S., 1992b. Independence of VNTR alleles defined as floating bins. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 992–997.
Weir, B.S., 1992e. Population genetics in the forensic DNA database. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 11654–11659.
Weir, B.S., 1993. Independence tests for VNTR alleles defined by quantile bins. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 1107–1113.
Weir, B.S. and C.C. Cockerham, 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chakraborty, R., Li, Z. (1995). Correlation of DNA fragment sizes within loci in the presence of non-detectable alleles. In: Weir, B.S. (eds) Human Identification: The Use of DNA Markers. Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46851-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46851-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1803-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46851-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive