Abstract
In the Introduction I posed a twofold question: whether a concept, originally predicated on the very exclusion of women can be reformulated so as satisfactorily to include (and not simply) append them; and in doing so, whether it can give full recognition to the different and shifting identities that women simultaneously hold. In other words, is the very idea of a ‘woman-friendly citizenship’ contradictory both because citizenship is inherently woman-unfriendly and because the category ‘woman’ itself represents a false universalism which replicates that of traditional constructions of citizenship? When I started working on the issue of women’s citizenship I was unsure as to the answer I would reach. As will have become clear, my conclusion was and remains that it is possible to conceive of a woman-friendly conceptualisation of citizenship at both the theoretical and policy level, for all its exclusionary and disciplinary tendencies. Citizenship, I believe, provides an invaluable strategic theoretical concept for the analysis of women’s subordination and a potentially powerful political weapon in the struggle against it. Moreover, it throws a searching light on difference, despite its universalist roots.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2003 Ruth Lister
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lister, R. (2003). Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Theory and Praxis of Citizenship. In: Campling, J. (eds) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80253-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80253-7_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-94820-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80253-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)