Abstract
An author with a well-organized piece of text must still pass two further hurdles before gaining credibility or approval in academic professional circles. The first is a test of style. Does the author communicate fluently, convincingly and appealingly in the professional manner appropriate for her discipline? Quite where success or failure should be determined here is difficult to specify in any general way. Evaluations of good or bad writing style are notoriously subjective. Much ink has been spilt on good style for novelists and creative writers (see Further Reading on p. 287 for some style manuals). But this literature offers little help to authors of doctoral theses or other large professional bits of text, like academic books. However, it is still possible to pull together some generally useful advice about conflicting style pressures, and some sensible ways of proceeding at a paragraph-by-paragraph, or sentence-by-sentence level, as I try to do in the first part of this chapter.
Poorer writers have fewer readers.
Robert J. Sternberg 1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Sternberg, The Psychologist’s Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and British Psychological Society, 1988), p. 3.
Alain de Botton, The Consolations of Philosophy (London: Penguin, 2000), pp. 158–9.
Howard S. Becker, Writing for Social Scientists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 81.
Quoted in R. Andrews, The Routledge Dictionary of Quotations (London: Routledge, 1987), p. 250.
Blaise Pascal, Pensées (London: Dent, 1932), p. 45, Thought number 145.
Quoted by Antoine Laurent Lavoisier in his Preface to The Elements of Chemistry (1789), reprinted in E. Blair Bolles (ed.), Galileo’s Commandment: An Anthology of Great Science Writing (London: Abacus, 2000), pp. 379–88, quote on p. 380.
G. K. Chesterton, The Everlasting Man (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1925), p. 161.
Joseph Gubaldi, MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing (New York: Modern Languages Association, 1998), 2nd edn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Patrick Dunleavy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunleavy, P. (2003). Writing Clearly: Style and Referencing Issues. In: Authoring a PhD. Palgrave Study Skills. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0584-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80208-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)