Skip to main content

Writing Clearly: Style and Referencing Issues

  • Chapter
  • 456 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Study Skills ((MASTSK))

Abstract

An author with a well-organized piece of text must still pass two further hurdles before gaining credibility or approval in academic professional circles. The first is a test of style. Does the author communicate fluently, convincingly and appealingly in the professional manner appropriate for her discipline? Quite where success or failure should be determined here is difficult to specify in any general way. Evaluations of good or bad writing style are notoriously subjective. Much ink has been spilt on good style for novelists and creative writers (see Further Reading on p. 287 for some style manuals). But this literature offers little help to authors of doctoral theses or other large professional bits of text, like academic books. However, it is still possible to pull together some generally useful advice about conflicting style pressures, and some sensible ways of proceeding at a paragraph-by-paragraph, or sentence-by-sentence level, as I try to do in the first part of this chapter.

Poorer writers have fewer readers.

Robert J. Sternberg 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Sternberg, The Psychologist’s Companion: A Guide to Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and British Psychological Society, 1988), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alain de Botton, The Consolations of Philosophy (London: Penguin, 2000), pp. 158–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howard S. Becker, Writing for Social Scientists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in R. Andrews, The Routledge Dictionary of Quotations (London: Routledge, 1987), p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blaise Pascal, Pensées (London: Dent, 1932), p. 45, Thought number 145.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted by Antoine Laurent Lavoisier in his Preface to The Elements of Chemistry (1789), reprinted in E. Blair Bolles (ed.), Galileo’s Commandment: An Anthology of Great Science Writing (London: Abacus, 2000), pp. 379–88, quote on p. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. K. Chesterton, The Everlasting Man (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1925), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph Gubaldi, MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing (New York: Modern Languages Association, 1998), 2nd edn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Patrick Dunleavy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunleavy, P. (2003). Writing Clearly: Style and Referencing Issues. In: Authoring a PhD. Palgrave Study Skills. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics