Abstract
Each team’s facility is a ‘stage’ on which its home matches are presented. If owned by the team, the stadium or arena is its largest physical capital asset. That ownership, or else a contract for the use of a publicly-owned stadium, allows the team to sell tickets, broadcast rights and Internet rights. Teams have an obvious economic interest in convincing the public authorities to pay for the stadium. To justify the public subsidy teams claim that the benefits generated by their presence extend beyond the fans that watch or listen to a game. Many economists claim that the benefits produced by teams are almost entirely private in nature and limited to the team’s fans. The chapter explores these claims and develops a framework to determine the optimal portion of public sector support for a sports facility. Next, the chapter considers the benefits and costs of different financial instruments and strategies to pay for any public subsidy of stadiums and arenas. The model of optimal cost-sharing between the public and private sectors and least cost payment mechanism are then compared with recent contracts for building new facilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Robert Sandy, Peter J. Sloane and Mark S. Rosentraub
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sandy, R., Sloane, P.J., Rosentraub, M.S. (2004). Financing the facilities used by professional sports teams. In: The Economics of Sport. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-37403-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-37403-4_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-79272-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37403-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)