Abstract
THERE IS effectively an infinite range of values available for the encoded signal in analogue modulation methods like AM and FM. The same can be said for the analogue pulse-modulation techniques, PAM, PWM and PPM. Digital modulation employs a small number of discrete pulse sizes, often just two, and consequently the signal amplitude must be encoded in some way. The significant words here are ‘in some way’, for that determines the capacity of the communications channel - how much information it can convey in a given time. A great advantage of digital communications is that the encoded message can be made as free from errors as desired and moreover, given the appropriate parameters of the channel, the error rate is predictable. It is inherently more difficult to maintain the relative levels of a continuously varying waveform than to recognise the presence or absence of a pulse. Thus signal distortion is cumulative in an analogue communications system, whereas in a digital system, no matter how many repeaters are used, the signal can be recovered with a guaranteed level of distortion. Digitising a signal also enables it to be encoded, so making it hard to intercept and decode: digital communications can be made secure fairly easily. The bandwidth available can also be used more efficiently by digitising signals and as the available wireless spectrum becomes ever more crowded this factor will prove decisive in shifting non-cable communications to a digital form.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2003 L. A. A. Warnes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warnes, L. (2003). Digital communications. In: Electronic and Electrical Engineering. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21633-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21633-4_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-99040-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-21633-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive