Skip to main content

‘As Tame as the Ladies’: Politics and Gender in The Changeling

  • Chapter
Revenge Tragedy

Part of the book series: New Casebooks ((NECA))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

In their recent books on seventeenth-century drama, Margot Heinemann and Jonathan Dollimore have characterised Thomas Middleton as a Puritan writing ‘opposition drama’ and a playwright composing ‘radical tragedy’. Heinemann sees Middleton appealing to and encouraging ‘“anti-establishment”, generally Parliamentary Puritan sympathies’. Dollimore understands Jacobean dramatists to be engaged in the ‘demystification of state power and ideology’, and a ‘contemporary critique of power relations’. Both encourage critics to identify drama during this period as potentially subversive, and to recognise the extent to which plays by Middleton and others actively stimulated, as Dollimore puts it, ‘the crisis in confidence in the integrity of those in power’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jonathan Dollimore, Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Chicago, 1984), pp. 4, 231;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Margot Heinemann, Puritanism and Theatre: Thomas Middleton and Opposition Drama under the Early Stuarts (Cambridge, 1980), p. 16. I am indebted to the following colleagues who discussed these issues with me or reviewed earlier versions of this essay: Murray Biggs, Richard Burt, Jill Campbell, Richard Dutton, Patricia Klindienst Joplin, John Morrison, Peter Stallybrass, and Valerie Wayne.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandra Clark, ‘Hic Mulier, Haec Vir, and the Controversy over Masculine Women’, Studies in Philology, 82 (1985), 157–83;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Katherine Usher Henderson and Barbara F. McManus, Half Humankind: Contexts and Texts of the Controversy about Women in England, 1540–1640 (Urbana, IL, 1985);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mary Beth Rose, ‘Women in Men’s Clothing: Apparel and Social Stability in The Roaring Girl’, English Literary Renaissance, 14 (1984), 367–91;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Linda Woodbridge, Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540–1620 (Urbana, IL, 1984), pp. 139–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Louis B. Wright, Middle-Class Culture in Elizabethan England (Chapel Hill, NC, 1935), pp. 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Rose, ‘Women in Men’s Clothing’, and J. R. Mulryne (ed.), Women Beware Women (Manchester, 1975), pp. xxxv–xxxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rachel Speght, A Mouzell for Melastomus, The Cynical Baytor of, and foul mouthed Barker against Evah’s Sex (1617), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edward F. Rimbault (ed.), Crumbs Fallen From King James’s Table, Or His Table Talk, in The Miscellaneous Works… of Sir Thomas Overbury (1856), p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. P. V. Akrigg, Jacobean Pageant (Cambridge, MA, 1962), pp. 180–204;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. William McElwee, The Murder of Thomas Overbury (New York, 1952);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beatrice White, Cast of Ravens: The Strange Case of Sir Thomas Overbury (London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. For other interpretations of this sexual imagery, see Barbara Joan Baines, The Lust Motif in the Plays of Thomas Middleton (Salzburg, 1973), pp. 114–15;

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. L. and M. K. Kistner, Middleton’s Tragic Themes (New York, 1984), p. 161;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christopher Ricks, ‘The Moral and Poetic Structure of The Changeling’, Essays in Criticism, 10 (1960), 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. For other interpretations of the image of the castle, see Thomas L. Berger, ‘The Petrarchan Fortress of The Changeling’, Renaissance Papers (1969), 37–46;

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. R. Owst, Literature and Pulpit in Medieval England (Cambridge, 1933), pp. 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Voice of the Shuttle is ours’, Stanford Literature Review, 1 (1984), 38. This article and my discussions with Patricia Joplin alerted me to the central role that the exchange of women plays in The Changeling, the public reaction to Frances Howard, and the Spanish marriage. For another reading of the significance of the body in The Changeling, see Frank Whigham, ‘Reading Social Conflict in the Alimentary Tract: More on the Body in Renaissance Drama’, English Literary History, 55 (1988), 339–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger (1966; London, 1980), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mary Douglas, Natural Symbols (1970; New York, 1982), p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peter Stallybrass, ‘Patriarchal Territories: the Body Enclosed’, in Margaret Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan and Nancy Vickers (eds), Rewriting the Renaissance: the Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe (Chicago, 1986), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas Robinson, The Anatomy of the English Nunnery at Lisbon in Portugal (1622), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gee, Foot out of the Snare, pp. 65–6. See also John Gee, New Shreds of the Old Snare (1624).

    Google Scholar 

  25. William Prynne, Hidden Works of Darkness Brought to Public Light (1645), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Charles H. McIlwain (ed.), The Political Works of James I (Cambridge, MA, 1918), p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  27. John Reynolds, The Triumph of God’s Revenge (1621; 1640), pp. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leonard Digges, Geraldo: The Unfortunate Spaniard (1622), pp. 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Stevie Simkin

Copyright information

© 2001 The Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malcolmson, C. (2001). ‘As Tame as the Ladies’: Politics and Gender in The Changeling. In: Simkin, S. (eds) Revenge Tragedy. New Casebooks. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21397-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics