Advertisement

Varieties of Reformation

  • R. W. Scribner
  • C. Scott Dixon
Chapter
  • 24 Downloads
Part of the Studies in European History book series (SEURH)

Abstract

One of the least edifying features of the reform movement was the way in which many of its participants were stigmatised and condemned by their fellow ‘evangelical Christians’. From the end of the 1520s, an emergent ‘Protestant’ orthodoxy consistently denigrated many who held evangelical ideas with which they did not agree, labelling them as ‘fanatics’ (Schwärmer), as obstinate and malicious deviants who fomented unrest and disturbance (92). Modern historiography discusses these stigmatised groups under the heading of Anabaptists or Radicals, and although they are now accorded more attention than they were in the past (96, 101–3), they are still seen as somehow marginal to the development of the ‘mainstream’ Reformation. This is a measure of how far the confessional historiography produced by erastian churches has influenced views of the Reformation, obscuring the fact that there were many strands in the original evangelical movements. These strands will not be discussed here using the labels created by confessional historiography. It will be more fruitful to single out the issues on which the various tendencies began to diverge, in order to understand how different groups of reformers began to separate themselves from one another.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  1. [87]
    C. P. Clasen, Anabaptism. A Social History 1525–1618 (1972). First extended social analysis of the Anabaptists.Google Scholar
  2. [88]
    M. U. Edwards, Luther and the False Brethren (Stanford, 1975). Valuable study of how Luther fell out with other reformers.Google Scholar
  3. [89]
    M. U. Edwards, Luther’s Last Battles. Politics and Polemics 1531–46 (Leiden, 1983). Excellent study of Luther’s polemics in his mature years.Google Scholar
  4. [90]
    G. Haendler, Luther on Ministerial Office and Congregational Function (Philadelphia, 1981) Study of how Luther’s views changed 1520–4.Google Scholar
  5. [91]
    R. Kolb, Nikolaus von Amsdorf (1483–1565) (Nieuwkoop, 1978). Illuminating study of Luther’s disciple who tried to preserve Luther’s thought as a rigid orthodoxy after 1546.Google Scholar
  6. [92]
    J. S. Oyer, Lutheran Reformers against Anabaptists (The Hague, 1964). Valuable study of how the ‘mainstream’ reformers stigmatised the Anabaptists.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [93]
    C. A. Pater, Karlstadt as the Father of the Baptist Movements: the Emergence of Lay Protestantism (Toronto, 1984). Rescues Karlstadt’s reputation as a serious evangelical thinker, and argues for his wider influence on Zwingli and the Anabaptists.Google Scholar
  8. [94]
    J. S. Preus, Carlstadt’s Ordinaciones and Luther’s Liberty. A Study of the Wittenberg Movement 1521–22 (Harvard, 1974). Study of where and how the two disagreed.Google Scholar
  9. [95]
    G. Rupp, Patterns of Reformation (1969). Brief treatment of some reformers hitherto neglected in English, especially good on Karlstadt and Müntzer.Google Scholar
  10. [96]
    J. M. Stayer and W. O. Packull (eds), The Anabaptists and Thomas Müntzer (Dubuque, Iowa, 1980). Translations of significant recent articles on radical reformers.Google Scholar
  11. [97]
    J. M. Stayer, Anabaptists and the Sword (Lawrence, 1972). Important discussion of Anabaptist views on political authority.Google Scholar
  12. [98]
    J. M. Stayer, ‘The Anabaptists’, in [5]. Sums up succinctly the state of present research.Google Scholar
  13. [99]
    L. H. Zuck (ed.), Christianity and Revolution. Radical Christian Testimonies 1520–1650 (Philadelphia, 1975). Selection of documents which allows the revolutionary reformed tradition to speak for itself.Google Scholar
  14. [100]
    K. Deppermann, Melchior Hoffman. Soziale Unruhen und apokalyptische Visionen im Zeitalter der Reformation (Göttingen, 1979). Exemplary biography combining social history with theological analysis.Google Scholar
  15. [101]
    H. J. Goertz (ed.), Profiles of Radical Reformers (Scottdale, Penn., 1982). Biographical sketches from Müntzer to Paracelsus.Google Scholar
  16. [102]
    H. J. Goertz (ed.), Umstrittenes Täufertum 1525–1975 (Göttingen, 1975). Important collection of revisionary essays, marking a move away from normative Lutheran assessments of the radicals.Google Scholar
  17. [103]
    H. J. Goertz, Die Täufer. Geschichte und Deutung (Munich, 1980). Excellent interpretation of the role of the Anabaptists in the Reformation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R. W. Scribner 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Scribner
  • C. Scott Dixon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations