Abstract
The rapidly growing body of feminist scholarship in Joyce studies1 can be seen as part of a larger project to rethink the complex intersections between gender and the logic of modernity.2 As Alice Jardine argues, the often uneasy valorisation of the feminine in modern literary and theoretical texts is not an accidental but rather an intrinsic feature of modernity. The invention or recovery of new rhetorical and ‘conceptual spaces’ in modern texts all too often depends on coding as feminine what has been excluded or marginalised in the dominant discourse.3 Similarly, the work of Julia Kristeva has located the source of the aesthetic ‘revolution’ in a desire to reach the maternal jouissance by violating the constraints of the symbolic exchange. The suppressed level of signification — the semiotic chora — is ‘gendered’ as maternal as if the structuralist linguistics could not be deconstructed without dismantling gender ideology.4 From yet another perspective, Luce Irigaray responds that the articulation of female sexuality in its own specificity necessarily involves ‘retraversal’ and ‘mimicry’ of the discursive operations of the patriarchal culture, whose specular system of representation is intolerant of differences, multiplicity, and indeterminancy.5
Argumentum ad feminam, as we said in old Rome and ancient Greece. … For the rest Eve’s sovereign remedy.
(James Joyce, Ulysses, p. 483)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alice A. Jardine, Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity (Ithaca, NY, 1985), p. 25.
Luce Irigaray, This Sex Which Is Not One, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, NY, 1985), pp. 28, 33, 72–81.
Rita Felski, The Gender of Modernity (Cambridge, 1995), p. 107.
Suzette A. Henke, Joyce’s Moraculous Sindbook: A Study of ‘Ulysses’ (Columbus, OH, 1978), p. 175.
Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn (London, 1992), p. 144.
Hélène Cixous, ‘Joyce: The (R)use of Writing’, in Derek Attridge and Daniel Ferrer (eds), Post-Structuralist Joyce: Essays from the French (New York, 1984), pp. 15–30 (p. 16).
Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak (Baltimore, 1974), p. 157.
Colin MacCabe, James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word (London, 1979), p. 125.
Frank Gifford, with Robert J. Seidman, ‘Ulysses’ Annotated: Notes for James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’, revd edn (Berkeley, CA, 1988), p. 15.
Victor Burgin, ‘Geometry and Abjection’, in Abjection, Melancholia, Love, ed., John Fletcher and Andrew Benjamin (New York, 1990), pp. 117–18.
Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. Leon S. Roudiez (New York, 1982), pp. 1–31.
Hélène Cixous, ‘At Circe’s, or the Self-Opener’, trans. Carol Bove, Boundary, 23 (1975), 387–97 (387).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2004 The Editor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plono, E., Ziarek, W. (2004). ‘Circe’: Joyce’s Argumentum ad Feminam. In: Emig, R. (eds) Ulysses. New Casebooks. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21248-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21248-0_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-54605-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-21248-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)