Skip to main content

Sustainability as a Business Model

  • Chapter
  • 317 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Series on Global Sustainability ((GSB))

Abstract

Reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2005), and the Worldwatch Institute (WWI) (2009) paint a bleak picture of the impact of human activity on the natural environment (see Table 3.1). While society and business rely on a healthy environment, the way humans use resources and the amounts used are irrevocably damaging the environment, such that humanity’s very life support systems are under threat (McPhail 2008). Referencing the work of eminent British economist Sir Nicholas Stern (2006), Espinosa and colleagues conclude that “[t]he possibility that complete environmental collapse is now decades rather than millennia away makes it in everyone’s interests to re-think fundamentally the structures and processes which have brought us so close to the brink” (Espinosa, Harnden, and Walker 2008, p. 645). McPhail (2008) concludes that bus iness-as-usual is not working. Incrementally improving the environmental efficiency of existing businesses— producing the same amount of products but with fewer resources and less energy, waste, and emissions—is not enough. Ryan (2008) argues that the level of reduction required in greenhouse gas emissions points to the need for rapid systemic change in business systems because the traditional management paradigm is inherently limited in its ability to address ecological degradation effectively (Shrivastava 1995) and traditional business models exacerbate the problems (Stubbs and Cocklin 2008a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R. C. 1998. Mid-course correction. Atlanta, GA: Perengrinzilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science 14(5): 510–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendigo and Adelaide Bank. 2009. Building Customer Connections. Full Annual Report 2009. Bendigo, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, F., A. Cashman, S. Koh, and Z. Liu. 2009a. New sustainable business models in China. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(1): 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, F., T. Polesie, and L. Lewis. 2009b. A new business model for sustainable development: An exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(5): 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. W. H. 1993. Approaches to social enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. W. H. 2000. Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, R. 2005. Views of sustainable development: A typology of stakeholders’ conflicting perspectives. In New horizons in research on sustainable organisations: Emerging ideas, approaches and tools for practitioners and researchers, ed. M. Starik, S. Sharma, C. Egri, and R. Bunch, 19–37. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, G., J. Francis, J. McGovern, and I. Pinge. 2003. A socio-economic evaluation of community banking. Bendigo Bank and the Centre for Sustainable Regional Communities. Bendigo: La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., H. E. Daly, and J. A. Bartholomew. 1991. Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics. In Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability, ed. R. Costanza, 1–20. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E., and J. B. Cobb. 1994. For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S. E. A., and A. Clifford. 2007. Ecopreneurship—a new approach to managing the triple bottom line. Journal of Organizational Change Management 20(3): 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, B. 2003. Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, D. H., and W. H. Glick. 1994. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review 19(2): 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D. C., A. Griffiths, and S. Benn. 2003. Organizational change for corporate sustainability: A guide for leaders and change agents of the future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14(October): 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st Century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 2001. The Chrysalis Economy: How citizen CEOs and corporations can fuse values and value creation. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa, A., R. Harnden, and J. Walker. 2008. A complexity approach to sustain-ability—Stafford Beer revisited. European Journal of Operational Research 187(2): 636–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., and J. W. Slocum Jr. 2008. Maximizing the Triple Bottom Line through spiritual leadership. Organizational Dynamics 37 (1): 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. 2000. New organisational architectures: Creating and retrofitting for sustainability. In Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century, ed. D. C. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, and P. Sutton, 219–235. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. 2003. Growth fetish. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. K. 2002. The microfinance revolution and the Grameen Bank experience in Bangladesh. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments 11(3): 205–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. P., and P. R. Ehrlich. 1974. Human population and the global environment. American Scientist 62: 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Working Group IV Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. D., and P. A. Zandbergen. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review 20(4): 1015–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., and A. L. White. 2009. From corporate responsibility to corporate design: Rethinking the purpose of the corporation. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, no. 33: 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., F. von Malmborg, P. A. Strachan, and J. R. Ehrenfeld. 2004. Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: An emerging research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 13(5): 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. T. 2002. The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 6: 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine, M. 2000. Banks for people: Community banking—prospects and limits, Perth, WA: Institute for Science and Technology Policy Murdoch University, ISTP occasional paper, 1/2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. A., and A. R. Fremeth. 2009. Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(3): 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markevich, A. 2009. The evolution of sustainability. MIT Sloan Management Review 51(1): 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, I. 2008. Victoria state of the environment report 2008. Melbourne: Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment 21(3): 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. 2002. Community Bank branch investment: Motivations and consequences. Department of Economics. Melbourne: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordic Partnership, The. 2002. Business models for sustainability: Experiences and opportunities from the Nordic Partnership. http://www.drabaekconsult.dk/LinkedDocuments/Business_model.pdf (accessed November 16, 2009).

  • Pearce, D., A. Markandya, and E. B. Barbier. 1989. Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. 1978. The valuation of social cost. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48(4): 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowledge, L. R., R. S. Barton, and K. S. Brady. 1999. Mapping the journey: Case studies in strategy and action toward sustainable development. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. 2008. Climate change and ecodesign: Part I: The focus shifts to ystems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(2): 140–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., and M. Starik. 2004. Stakeholders, the environment, and society: Multiple perspectives, emerging consensus. In Stakeholders, the environment, and society, ed. S. Sharma and M. Starik: 1–22. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. 1995. Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M. 1995. Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics 14(3): 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. 2006. Stern Review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., and C. Cocklin. 2007. Cooperative, community-spirited, and commercial: Social sustainability at Bendigo Bank. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 14: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., and C. Cocklin. 2008a. Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model.’ Organization & Environment 21(2): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., and C. Cocklin. 2008b. An ecological modernist interpretation of sustainability: The case of Interface Inc. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(8): 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2005. One planet many people: Atlas of our changing environment. Nairobi, Kenya: Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., N. B. Schulz, D. Deumling, A. C. Linares, M. Jenkins, V. Kapos, C. Monfreda, J. Loh, N. Myers, R. Norgaard, and J. Randers. 2002. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(14): 9266–9271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. 2007. Leadership integrity in a fractured knowledge world. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6(4): 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. 2008. Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives 22(3): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., E. Shils, and H. A. Finch. 1949. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C. 1996. Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business and Society 35(1): 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute, The. 2009. State of the world: Into a warming world. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 James A. F. Stoner and Charles Wankel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stubbs, W. (2010). Sustainability as a Business Model. In: Stoner, J.A.F., Wankel, C. (eds) Global Sustainability as a Business Imperative. The Palgrave Series on Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-11543-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics