Skip to main content

Urinary Tract Obstruction and Infection

  • Chapter
  • 903 Accesses

Abstract

In most patients, ureteral obstruction results from an acute process with associated symptoms. Some controversy exists as to which imaging studies are best for investigating suspected ureteral obstruction. In most hospitals in the United States, non-contrast helical computed tomography (CT) is preferred because it is safe and extremely rapid, and the accuracy rate for detecting ureteral stones, the most common cause of ureteral obstruction, exceeds that of other imaging studies. Other causes of acute abdominal pain, such as appendicitis, leaking aortic aneurysm, and diverticulitis, can also be readily diagnosed and occur in 13–19% of cases. Non-contrast helical CT has an overall accuracy of 97% for diagnosing ureteral stone disease [1]–[8]. This far exceeds the accuracy of intravenous urography (IVU) or ultrasonography (US) (See Table 1). Regardless of composition, virtually all ureteral stones have high attenuation values, making them readily detectable with CT. Nonmineralized matrix stones and some drug-related stones (due, for example, to protease inhibitors) may not be visible on CT images, but are rarely encountered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N et al (1999) Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1491–1494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G et al (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol, pp 8212–8217

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F et al (2002) Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:379–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M et al (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 204:27–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olcott EW, Sommer FG, Napel S (1997) Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography. Radiology 204:19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Remer EM, Herts BR, Streem SB et al (1997) Spiral noncontrast CT versus combined plain radiography and renal UR after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; cost-identification analysis. Radiology 204:33–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zagoria RJ, Khatod E, Chen MYM (2001) Abdominal radiography after positive CT stone study: a method to predict utility based on stone size and CT attenuation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1117–1122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S et al (1996) Diagnosis of acute flank pain:value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:97–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fielding JR, Silverman SG, Samuel S et al (1998) Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1051–1053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyer RB, Chen MYM, Zagoria RJ (2001) Intravenous urography: technique and interpretation. Radiographics 21:799–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM (1995) Role of renal Doppler imaging in the evaluation of acute renal obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:379–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH (1989) Distinction between obstructive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis with duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153:997–1000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronan JJ (1992) Contemporary concepts for imaging urinary tract obstruction. Urol Radiol 14:8–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Older RA, Stoll HL III, Omary RA et al (1997) Clinical value of renovascular resistive index measurement in the diagnosis of acute obstructive uropathy. J Urol 157:2053–2055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burge HJ, Middleton WD, McClennan BL et al (1991) Ureteral jets in healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison with color Doppler US. Radiology 180:437–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aerts P, Van Hoe L, Bosmans H et al (1996) Breath-hold MR urography using the HASTE technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:543–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothpearl A, Frager D, Subramanian A et al (1995) MR urography: technique and application. Radiology 194:125–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Assi Z, Platt JF, Francis IR et al (2000) Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:333–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fielding JR, Washburn D (2005) Imaging the pregnant patient: a uniform approach. J Women’s Imaging 7:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zagoria RJ, Dyer RB (1991) Radiology of renal infectious disease. Contemp Diagn Radiol 8:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rubenstein JN, Schaeffer AJ (2003) Managing complicated urinary tract infections. The urologic view. Infect Dis Clin N Am 17:333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dacher J, Pfister C, Monroc M et al (1996) Power Doppler sonographic pattern of acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1451–1455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Majd M, Nussbaum Blask AR, Markle BM et al (2001) Acute pyelonephritis: comparison with Tc99m-DMSA SPECT, spiral CT, MR imaging, and power Doppler US in an experimental pig model. Radiology 218:101–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker MD, Clark RL (1989) Evolving concepts in the diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Urol Radiol 11:7–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zagoria, R.J., Fielding, J.R. (2006). Urinary Tract Obstruction and Infection. In: Hodler, J., Von Schulthess, G.K., Zollikofer, C.L. (eds) Diseases of The Abdomen and Pelvis. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0508-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0508-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0470-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0508-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics