Advertisement

La chirurgia mini-invasiva nelle protesi totali di ginocchio

  • M. Innocenti
  • R. Civinini
  • M. Villano

Estratto

L’applicazione della chirurgia mini-invasiva (MIS) alla protesi totale di ginocchio costituisce una tendenza non eludibile nel momento in cui la opportunità di conservare quanto più possibile le strutture anatomiche, ampiamente accettata concettualmente, si stia affermando anche nel riscontro clinico.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. 1.
    Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C (2004) Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (428):61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tria AJ Jr (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 35:227–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Jr (2004) Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty. Techniques in Knee Surgery 3:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE (1991) Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:70–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gore DR, Sellinger DS, Gassner KJ, Glaeser ST (2003) Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 26:33–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK (2002) Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop 398:189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faure BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B et al (1993) Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:511–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. Orthop Clin North Am 35:217–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL (1997) A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:322–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A et al (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop (428):74–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop (428):68–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalury DF, Jiranek WA (1999) A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White RE Jr, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH (1999) Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop 367:117–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dalury DF (2004) Does the mid-vastus approach compromise the vastus medialis obliquus? Arch Am Acad Orthop Surg 5:454–459Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parentis MA, Rumi MN, Deol GS (1999) A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:107–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Insall JN (1971) A midline approach to the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:1584–1586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marlowe Goble E, Justin FJ (2004) Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. Orthop Clin North Am 35:235–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vail TP (2004) Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (428):51–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM (2003) Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop (416):185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Innocenti
    • 1
  • R. Civinini
    • 1
  • M. Villano
    • 1
  1. 1.II Clinica OrtopedicaUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations