Development of a Fabric-Reinforced Porous Graft for Vascular Tissue Engineering Using Finite Element Methods and Genetic Algorithms

  • Mark S. YeomanEmail author
  • B. Daya Reddy
  • Deon Bezuidenhout
  • Hellmut C. Bowles
  • Peter Zilla
  • Thomas FranzEmail author
Part of the Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials book series (SMTEB, volume 15)


Small to medium diameter vascular grafts have met with little success over the past 50 years. Surface thrombogenicity and anastomotic intimal hyperplasia, the main reasons for graft failure, are believed to be governed by a lack of endothelialisation and compliance mismatch between graft and host artery. High-porosity polyurethane grafts allow for cellular ingrowth and vascularization, they however encounter detrimental ballooning and low burst strength. To improve the structural properties, a support is required that will not adversely affect ingrowth permissibility of the graft. In this study, an approach combining finite element methods and genetic algorithms was developed to adopt the concept of arterial mechanics, which are predominantly governed by medial and adventitial layer, to tissue-regenerative vascular grafts. The numerical method was able to identify the mechanical properties of adventitial knit fabrics that optimally complement three different intimal/medial porous polyurethane structures to provide grafts with a compliance of 5.3, 5.5 and 6.0 %/100 mmHg. Grafts featuring fabrics manufactured according to the numerically specifications exhibited an in vitro compliance of \(2.1\pm0.8\), \(3.0 \pm 2.4\) and \(4.0\pm 0.7\) %/100 mmHg. Beyond the demonstration of the feasibility of numerical method, it was shown that the graft system of adventitially reinforced polymer with well-defined interconnected porosity can be expected to facilitate the ingrowth and regeneration of vascular tissue for all pore sizes studied.


Axial Stress Strain Energy Function Transverse Strain Dynamic Compliance Membrane Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was mainly funded through a research collaboration grant by Medtronic Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA) to the University of Cape Town. The authors acknowledge the assistance of Richard Steventon with the GA coding.


  1. 1.
    Bezuidenhout, D.: Porous Polymeric Superstructures as In-Growth Scaffolds for Tissue-Engineered Vascular Prosthesis. Ph.D. Thesis, Stellenbosch University, 2001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bezuidenhout, D., Davies, N., Zilla, P.: Effect of well defined dodecahedral porosity on inflammation and angiogenesis. ASAIO J. 48, 465–471 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkel, W.E: The challenge of small diameter vascular grafts. Med. Prog. Technol. 14, 165–175 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chuong, C.J, Fung, Y.C: Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 105, 268–274 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, N., Dobner, S., Bezuidenhout, D., Schmidt, C., Beck, M., Zisch, A.H., Zilla, P.: The dosage dependence of VEGF stimulation on scaffold neovascularisation. Biomaterials 29, 3531–3538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsch, M., Meinhart, J., Zilla, P., Howanietz, N., Gorlitzer, M., Froeschl, A., Stuempflen, A., Bezuidenhout, D., Grabenwoeger, M.: Long-term experience in autologous in vitro endothelialization of infrainguinal ePTFE grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 49, 352–362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fung, Y.C: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissue, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gamble, J., Matthias, L., Meyer, G., Kaur, P., Russ, G., Faull, R., Berndt, M., Vadas, M.: Regulation of in vitro capillary tube formation by anti-integrin antibodies. J. Cell Biol. 121, 931–943 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasson, J.E., Megerman, J., Abbott, W.A: Increased compliance near vascular anastomosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2, 419–423 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayashi, K.: Experimental approaches on measuring the mechanical properties and constitutive laws of arterial walls. J. Biomech. Eng. 115, 481–487 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hess, F., Jerusalem, C., Braun, B.: The endothelialisation of a fibrous polyurethane microvascular prosthesis after implantation in the abdominal aorta of the rat. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 24, 516–524 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    How, T.V., Guidon, R., Young, S.K: Engineering design of vascular prosthesis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 206, 61–71 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu, C.-C., Chao, C.-K., Wang, J.-L., Lin, J.: Multiobjective optimization of tibial locking screw design using a genetic algorithm: evaluation of mechanical performance. J. Orthop. Res. 24, 908–916 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khalil, A.S., Bouma, B.E., Kaazempur Mofrad, M.R: A combined FEM/genetic algorithm for vascular soft tissue elasticity estimation. Cardiovasc. Eng. 6, 93–103 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, J.H.: Fabric Mechanics Analysis Using Large Deformation Orthotropic Shell Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, 1991Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NN: Cardiovascular Implants—Vascular Prosthesis. American National Standard Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, AAMI standard edition, 1994Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    NN: Cardiovascular Implants—Tubular Vascular Prosthesis. ISO International Standard 7198, 1998Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pandit, A., Lu, X., Wang, C., Kassab, G.S.: Biaxial elastic material properties of porcine coronary media and adventitia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288, H2581–H2587 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seifert, K.B., Albo, D., Knowlton, H., Lyman, D.J: Effect of elasticity of prosthetic wall on patency of small-diameter arterial prosthesis. Surg. Forum 30, 206–208 (1979)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siauve, N., Nicolas, L., Vollaire, C., Marchal, C.: Optimization of the sources in local hyperthermia using a combined finite element-genetic algorithm method. Int. J. Hyper. 20, 815–833 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stewart, S.F.C, Lyman, D.J: Effects of vascular graft/natural artery compliance mismatch on pulsatile flow. J. Biomech. 25, 297–310 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Storåkers, B.: On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 34, 125–145 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tai, N.R., Salacinski, H.J., Edwards, A., Hamilton, G., Seifalian, A.M: Compliance properties of conduits used in vascular reconstruction. Br. J. Surg. 87, 1516–1524 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahara, A., Coury, A.J., Hergenrother, R.W., Cooper, S.L: Effect of soft segment chemistry on the biostability of segmented polyurethanes. I. In vitro oxidation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25, 341–356 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, C., Garcia, M., Lu, X., Lanir, Y., Kassab, G.S.: Three-dimensional mechanical properties of porcine coronary arteries: a validated two-layer model. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291, H1200–H1209 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weston, M.W., Rhee, K., Tarbell, J.M: Compliance and diameter mismatch affect the wall shear rate distribution near end-to-end anastomosis. J. Biomech. 29, 187–198 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yeoman, M.S., Reddy, B.D., Bowles, H.C., Bezuidenhout, D., Zilla, P., Franz, T.: A constitutive model for the warp-weft coupled non-linear behavior of knitted biomedical textiles. Biomaterials 31(32), 8484–8493 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yeoman, M.S., Reddy, B.D., Bowles, H.C., Zilla, P., Bezuidenhout, D., Franz, T.: The use of finite element methods and genetic algorithms in search of an optimal fabric reinforced porous graft system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37, 2266–2287 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yeoman, M.S.: The Design and Optimisation of Fabric Reinforced Porous Prosthetic Grafts Using Finite Element Methods and Genetic Algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cape Town, June 2004Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zilla, P., Bezuidenhout, D., Human, P.: Prosthetic vascular grafts: Wrong models, wrong questions and no healing. Biomaterials 28, 5009–5027 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark S. Yeoman
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Daya Reddy
    • 2
  • Deon Bezuidenhout
    • 3
  • Hellmut C. Bowles
    • 4
  • Peter Zilla
    • 3
  • Thomas Franz
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Continuum Blue Ltd.HengoedUK
  2. 2.Centre for Research in Computational and Applied MechanicsUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Cardiovascular Research Unit, Chris Barnard Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  4. 4.Finite Element Analysis Services (Pty.) Ltd.ParklandsSouth Africa
  5. 5.Research OfficeUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  6. 6.Centre for Research in Computational and Applied MechanicsUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations