Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Tertiary Wastewater Treatment to Seawater Desalination Using Life Cycle Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cost-efficient Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 118))

  • 545 Accesses

Abstract

The Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries consume approximately half of their oil production for water and energy cogeneration. This intricate situation of increasing water consumption and freshwater scarcity paradox have made wastewater treatment and reuse indispensable. Reuse of treated wastewater contributes to savings fossil fuels and entailed environmental impacts. The objective of this chapter is to demonstrate the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact and missed opportunity of treating municipal wastewater to tertiary quality compared to conventional water production. The conventional method compared is the dominant seawater desalination using multistage flash distillation (MSF). The study follows the ISO 14040/44 standards and uses a functional unit of 1 M m3 of tertiary treated effluent (TTE). The modeling concept adopts the cradle-to-gate consequential modeling paradigm. The life cycle inventory is based on filed data collection, reports, literature, and Ecoinvent database processes. The inventories include: infrastructure, grid, materials, energy requirements, chemical additives, and sludge disposal; for primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment. The life cycle impact assessment is applied on both the characterized and normalized level using the ReCiPe method. The normalized results indicate that MSF has over 70 times the impact on fossil depletion and over 8 times the impact on particulate matter formation, human toxicity, and climate change for water production compared to the effects of TTE. The TTE effluent is best for agricultural use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UN Water (2020) Water scarcity. https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/scarcity/

  2. McKinsey & Co. (2009) Charting our water future: economic frameworks to inform decision-making

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mujtaba IM, Srinivasan R, Elbashir N (2017) The water-food-energy nexus: processes, technologies, and challenges. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moser M, Trieb F, Fichter T (2013) Potential of concentrating solar power plants for the combined production of water and electricity in MENA countries. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst 1:122–140

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jijakli K, Arafat H, Kennedy S, Mande P, Theeyattuparampil VV (2012) How green solar desalination really is? Environmental assessment using life-cycle analysis (LCA) approach. Desalination 287:123–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mezher T, Fath H, Abbas Z, Khaled A (2011) Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies. Desalination 266:263–273

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roudi-Fahimi F, Creel L, Souza R-MD (2002) Finding the balance: population and water scarcity in the Middle East and North Africa. Population Reference Bureau (PRB), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qadir M, Bahri A, Sato T, Al-Karadsheh E (2010) Wastewater production, treatment, and irrigation in Middle East and North Africa. Irrig Drain Syst 24:37–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pivac DZ (2015, 2017) Water scarcity in the Middle East. bq magazine. http://www.bq-magazine.com/industries/2015/02/water-scarcity-in-the-middle-east

  10. Al-Otaibi A, Abdel-Jawad M (2007) Water security for Kuwait. Desalination 214:299–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert LA (2014) Water, state power, and tribal politics in the GCC: the case of Kuwait and Abu Dhabi. Center for International and Regional Studies Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lattemann S, Höpner T (2008) Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination 220:1–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamoda MF (2004) Water strategies and potential of water reuse in the South Mediterranean countries. Desalination 165:31–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aleisa E, Heijungs R (2020) Leveraging life cycle assessment and simplex lattice design in optimizing fossil fuel blends for sustainable desalination. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:744–759

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Darwish MA, Al-Najem NM, Lior N (2009) Towards sustainable seawater desalting in the Gulf area. Desalination 235:58–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. World Bank. A report on the assessment of the water sector in the countries of the Cooperation Council for the Arab Gulf States (Arabic) [Online]. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMNAREGTOPWATRES/Resources/GCC-AR-AGFUND-UpdComplete.pdf

  17. Fattouh B, Mahadeva L (2014) Price reform in Kuwait’s electricity and water sector – assessing the net benefits in the presence of congestion. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aleisa E, Al-Shayji K (2018) Ecological–economic modeling to optimize a desalination policy: case study of an arid rentier state. Desalination 430:64–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. IRENA (2019) Renewable energy market analysis. Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaya A, Tok ME, Koc M (2019) A levelized cost analysis for solar-energy-powered sea water desalination in the emirate of Abu Dhabi. Sustainability 11:1691

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ventures ONSITE (2019) Mena desalination market. Ventures.com, Dubai

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aleisa E, Al-Zubari W (2017) Wastewater reuse in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): the lost opportunity. Environ Monit Assess 189:553

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen X, Yip NY (2018) Unlocking high-salinity desalination with cascading osmotically mediated reverse osmosis: energy and operating pressure analysis. Environ Sci Technol 52:2242–2250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dahdah TH, Mitsos A (2014) Structural optimization of seawater desalination: I. A flexible superstructure and novel MED–MSF configurations. Desalination 344:252–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mannan M, Alhaj M, Mabrouk AN, Al-Ghamdi SG (2019) Examining the life-cycle environmental impacts of desalination: a case study in the State of Qatar. Desalination 452:238–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. AL-Jarallah R (2013) The potential for reusing grey water and its generation rates for sustainable potable water security in Kuwait. J Eng Res 1:97–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Shammari SB, Shahalam AM (2006) Effluent from an advanced wastewater treatment plant — an alternate source of non-potable water for Kuwait. Desalination 196:215–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Corcoran E, Nelleman C, Baker E, Bos R, Osborn D, Savelli H (eds) (2010) Sick water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable development (a rapid respose assessment). UNEP, UN-HABITAT, GRID-Arendal, Birkeland Trykkeri AS, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  29. UN Water (2021) Progress on level of water stress - 2021 update: global status and acceleration needs for SDG indicator 6.4.2. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and United Nations Water, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6241en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Tillman A-M, Svingby M, Lundström H (1998) Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:145–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heimersson S, Svanström M, Ekvall T (2019) Opportunities of consequential and attributional modelling in life cycle assessment of wastewater and sludge management. J Clean Prod 222:242–251

    Google Scholar 

  32. Machado AP, Urbano L, Brito AG, Janknecht P, Salas JJ, Nogueira R (2007) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment options for small and decentralized communities. Water Sci Technol 56:15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Makisha N (2016) Waste water and biogas – ecology and economy. Procedia Eng 165:1092–1097

    Google Scholar 

  34. Raghuvanshi S, Bhakar V, Sowmya C, Sangwan KS (2017) Waste water treatment plant life cycle assessment: treatment process to reuse of water. Procedia CIRP 61:761–766

    Google Scholar 

  35. Buyukkamaci N (2013) Life cycle assessment applications in wastewater treatment. J Pollut Effects Control 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  36. McNamara G, Fitzsimons L, Horrigan M, Phelan T (2016) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Ireland. Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst 4:216–233

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2013) Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water Environ J 27:261–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Larsen HF (2018) LCA of wastewater treatment. In: Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (eds) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer, Cham, pp 861–886

    Google Scholar 

  39. Corominas L, Foley J, Guest JS, Hospido A, Larsen HF, Morera S et al (2013) Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art. Water Res 47:5480–5492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yoshida H, Christensen TH, Scheutz C (2013) Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: a review. Waste Manag Res 31:1083–1101

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pradel M, Aissani L, Villot J, Baudez J-C, Laforest V (2016) From waste to added value product: towards a paradigm shift in life cycle assessment applied to wastewater sludge – a review. J Clean Prod 131:60–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gallego-Schmid A, Tarpani RRZ (2019) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in developing countries: a review. Water Res 153:63–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tavakol-Davani H, Burian SJ, Butler D, Sample D, Devkota J, Apul D (2018) Combining hydrologic analysis and life cycle assessment approaches to evaluate sustainability of water infrastructure. J Irrig Drain Eng 144:05018006

    Google Scholar 

  44. Petit-Boix A, Arnal C, Marín D, Josa A, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2018) Addressing the life cycle of sewers in contrasting cities through an eco-efficiency approach. J Ind Ecol 22:1092–1104

    Google Scholar 

  45. Raghuvanshi S, Bhakar V, Chava R, Sangwan K (2018) Comparative study using life cycle approach for the biodiesel production from microalgae grown in wastewater and fresh water. Procedia CIRP 69:568–572

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang J, Yuan H, Deng Y, Zha Y, Abu-Reesh IM, He Z et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of a microbial desalination cell for sustainable wastewater treatment and saline water desalination. J Clean Prod 200:900–910

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Awad H, Alalm MG, El-Etriby HK (2019) Environmental and cost life cycle assessment of different alternatives for improvement of wastewater treatment plants in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 660:57–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bai S, Zhao X, Wang D, Zhang X, Ren N (2018) Engaging multiple weighting approaches and conjoint analysis to extend results acceptance of life cycle assessment in biological wastewater treatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 265:349–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lopes AC, Valente A, Iribarren D, González-Fernández C (2018) Energy balance and life cycle assessment of a microalgae-based wastewater treatment plant: a focus on alternative biogas uses. Bioresour Technol 270:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  50. Guven H, Eriksson O, Wang Z, Ozturk I (2018) Life cycle assessment of upgrading options of a preliminary wastewater treatment plant including food waste addition. Water Res 145:518–530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu R, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Awe OW (2018) Diagnosis and evaluation of an early-stage green bio-sorption reactor by life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 200:100–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Anastasopoulou A, Kolios A, Somorin T, Sowale A, Jiang Y, Fidalgo B et al (2018) Conceptual environmental impact assessment of a novel self-sustained sanitation system incorporating a quantitative microbial risk assessment approach. Sci Total Environ 639:657–672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Li Y, Zhang S, Zhang W, Xiong W, Ye Q, Hou X et al (2019) Life cycle assessment of advanced wastewater treatment processes: involving 126 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in life cycle inventory. J Environ Manag 238:442–450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pradel M, Aissani L (2019) Environmental impacts of phosphorus recovery from a “product” life cycle assessment perspective: allocating burdens of wastewater treatment in the production of sludge-based phosphate fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 656:55–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management life cycle assessment principle. In: Standards for LCA to promote sustainable development, vol 14040. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  56. Curran MA (2016) Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ma X, Yang D, Shen X, Zhai Y, Zhang R, Hong J (2018) How much water is required for coal power generation: an analysis of gray and blue water footprints. Sci Total Environ 636:547–557

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhao X, Yang J, Ma F (2018) Set organic pollution as an impact category to achieve more comprehensive evaluation of life cycle assessment in wastewater-related issues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5960–5968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (2017) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hauschild MZ (2018) Introduction to LCA methodology. In: Life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  61. Goedkoop M, Schryver AD, Oele M, Durksz S, Roest D (2010) SimaPro 7 -. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro, 4.5. PRé Consultants, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  62. ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  63. JRC (2010) ILCD handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment - detailed guidance. Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  64. Heijungs R (2014) Ten easy lessons for good communication of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:473–476

    Google Scholar 

  65. ISO 14044 (2006) Life cycle assessment Requirements and guidelines. In: Environmental management, vol 13.020.60 ed. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  66. MPW (2018) Reports from the sanitary engineering sector in Kuwait. Ministry of Public Work Kuwait

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wahlberg EJ, Stallings RB, Appleton AR (2005) Primary clarifier design concepts and considerations. Proc Water Environ Fed 2005:4417–4430

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hamoda M (2013) Advances in wastewater treatment technology for water reuse. J Eng Res 1:1–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hsu A, Emerson J, Johnson L, Malik O, Schwartz JD, Allison A et al (2014) Environmental performance index: full report and analysis. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, Yale University; Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University; World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland; The Samuel Family Foundation, Toronto, Canada, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  70. MPW (2019) Kabd WWTP. Depatment of operation and maintenance of plants (North Zone), Kuwait

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ecoinvent. Electricity production, oil ROW [Online]

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lee K-M, Yu S, Choi Y-H, Lee M (2012) Environmental assessment of sewage effluent disinfection system: electron beam, ultraviolet, and ozone using life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:565–579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Al-Shayji K, Aleisa E (2018) Characterizing the fossil fuel impacts in water desalination plants in Kuwait: a life cycle assessment approach. Energy 158:681–692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M et al (2016) ReCiPe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization. RIVM Report 2016–0104, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  75. Huijbregts MA, Steinmann ZJ, Elshout PM, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M et al (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  76. Crenna E, Secchi M, Benini L, Sala S (2019) Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:1851–1877

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Raluy G, Serra L, Uche J (2006) Life cycle assessment of MSF, MED and RO desalination technologies. Energy 31:2361–2372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. MEW (2016) Consumption of chemicals for distillation units from 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2016, vol 2016, O. a. maintenance. Ministry of Electricity and Water, Kuwait

    Google Scholar 

  79. Khawaji AD, Kutubkhanah IK, Wie J-M (2008) Advances in seawater desalination technologies. Desalination 221:47–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Vince F, Aoustin E, Bréant P, Marechal F (2008) LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production. Desalination 220:37–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Raluy RG, Serra L, Uche J, Valero A (2004) Life-cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with energy production systems. Desalination 167:445–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Aleisa E, Alshayji K (2019) Analysis on reclamation and reuse of wastewater in Kuwait. J Eng Res 7

    Google Scholar 

  83. World Bank (2005) A water sector assessment report on the countries of the cooperation council of the Arab states of the Gulf, Water, Environment, Social and Rural Development Department Middle East and North Africa Region, Washington, DC, 32539-MNA, March 31, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  84. Al-Zubari WK (1998) Towards the establishment of a total water cycle management and re-use program in the GCC countries. Desalination 120:3–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research software was supported partially by Kuwait University. We thank Mr. Eisa Alrishidi and Ms. Huda Alengawi for their valuable assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait

    Esra E. Aleisa

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait

    Mohamed F. Hamoda

  3. Ministry of Electricity and Water, Department of General Services and Training, Kuwait City, Kuwait

    Asmaa M. Al-Mutiri

Authors
  1. Esra E. Aleisa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed F. Hamoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asmaa M. Al-Mutiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra E. Aleisa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria, Egypt

    Mahmoud Nasr

  2. Water and Water Structures Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M. Negm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aleisa, E.E., Hamoda, M.F., Al-Mutiri, A.M. (2022). Comparing Tertiary Wastewater Treatment to Seawater Desalination Using Life Cycle Assessment. In: Nasr, M., Negm, A.M. (eds) Cost-efficient Wastewater Treatment Technologies. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2022_882

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation