Skip to main content

Modelling and Evaluation of the Effect of Afforestation on the Runoff Generation Within the Glinščica River Catchment (Central Slovenia)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 107))

Abstract

Increases in the frequency of flood events are one of the major risk factors induced by climate change that lead to a higher vulnerability of affected communities. Natural water retention measures such as afforestation on hillslopes and floodplains are increasingly discussed as cost-effective alternatives to hard engineering structures for providing flood protection, particularly when the evaluation also considers beneficial ecosystem services other than flood protection. The present study provides a combined modelling approach and a cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of the effects of afforestation on peak river flows and on selected ecosystem services within the Glinščica River catchment in Slovenia. In order to investigate these effects, the hydrological model HEC-HMS, the hydraulic model HEC-RAS, and the flood damage model KRPAN, which were developed specifically for Slovenia, are used. Three scenarios were evaluated where the main difference was the extent of afforestation. It was found that increasing the amount of tree cover (i.e., ≈15–60%) results in a flood peak reduction ranging from 9 to 13%. Flood extensions were significantly lower for most scenarios leading to reduced economic losses. However, a 100-year CBA only showed positive net present values (NPV) for one of the considered scenarios, where the afforestation was considered only in floodplain areas and the prevailing benefits were those of flood protection measures, which were higher than, for example, biodiversity or recreational benefits. Additional ecosystem co-benefits that are not directly linked with flood protection are considered in case of all three scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blöschl G, Hall J, Viglione A, Perdigão RA, Parajka J, Merz B et al (2019) Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 573(7772):108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stratford C, Miller J, House A, Old G, Acreman M, Duenas-Lopez MA, et al (2017) Do trees in UK-relevant river catchments influence fluvial flood peaks? A systematic review

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nisbet T (2004) Interactions between floodplain woodland and the freshwater environment. Forest Res Ann Rep Accounts 2003(4):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dittrich R, Ball T, Wreford A, Moran D, Spray CJ (2018) A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk. J Flood Risk Manage 12:e12482

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vidmar A, Zabret K, Sapač K, Pergar P, Kryžanowski A (2019) Development of an application for estimating the benefits of structural and non-structural measures for flood risk reduction. In: Biondić D, Holjević D, Vizner M (eds.) Croatianwaters in environmental and nature protection: proceedings of 7th Croatian water conference with international participation in Opatija, 30 May-1 June 2019. Grafički zavod Hrvatske, Zagreb, pp 615–624

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bezak N, Šraj M, Rusjan S, Mikoš M (2018) Impact of the rainfall duration and temporal rainfall distribution defined using the huff curves on the hydraulic flood modelling results. Geoscienes 8(2):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Šraj M, Bezak N, Rusjan S, Mikoš M (2016b) Review of hydrological studies contributing to the advancement of hydrological sciences in Slovenia. Acta Hydrotech 29(50):47–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dolšak D, Bezak N, Šraj M (2016) Temporal characteristics of rainfall events under three climate types in Slovenia. J Hydrol 541:1395–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Šraj M, Dirnbek L, Brilly M (2010) The influence of effective rainfall on modeled runoff hydrograph. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman AD (2000) Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: technical reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center

    Google Scholar 

  11. USACE (2016) HEC-RAS river analysis system. Hydraulic reference manual, version 5.0. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute of Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller A, Knoke T, Olschewski R (2019) Can existing estimates for ecosystem service values inform forest management? Forests 10(2):132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Masiero M, Pettenella D, Boscolo M, Barua SK, Animon I, Matta JR (2019) Valuing forest ecosystem services: a training manual for planners and project developers. Forestry working paper no. 11. Rome, FAO. 216 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prostor (2019) Spatial portal of the Republic of Slovenia. http://prostor3.gov.si/ETN-JV/. Accessed Dec 2019

  15. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529443

  16. Bernal B, Murray LT, Pearson TR (2018) Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities. Carbon Balance Manag 13(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IUCN (2018) Global emissions and removals databases. https://infoflr.org/what-flr/global-emissions-and-removals-databases. Accessed Dec 2019

  18. OECD (2016) Effective carbon rates: pricing CO2 through Taxes and emissions trading systems. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Ljubljana Tourism (LT) (2019) The path of remembrance and comradeship. https://www.visitljubljana.com/en/visitors/explore/things-to-do/active-holidays/article/the-path-of-remembrance-and-comradeship/. Accessed Dec 2019

  20. Japelj A, Mavsar R, Hodges D, Kovač M, Juvančič L (2016) Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Forest Policy Econ 71:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tinch R, Thomson C, Dickie I, Leslie R (2010) The economic contribution of the public forest estate in England. In: Report prepared for the Forestry Commission, London (London: eftec)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Broadmeadow S, Nisbet TR (2004) The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ogrinc N, Tamše S, Zavadlav S, Vrzel J, Jin L (2019) Evaluation of geochemical processes and nitrate pollution sources at the Ljubljansko Polje aquifer (Slovenia): a stable isotope perspective. Sci Total Environ 646:1588–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall JW, Tarantola S, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2005) Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. J Hydraul Eng 131(2):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was conducted as part of a short-term scientific mission (STSM) within the LAND4FLOOD: Natural Flood Retention on Private Land (CA16209) Cost Action. The study was also conducted as part of the research program P2-0180 financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nejc Bezak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnen, G., Sapač, K., Rusjan, S., Zupanc, V., Vidmar, A., Bezak, N. (2020). Modelling and Evaluation of the Effect of Afforestation on the Runoff Generation Within the Glinščica River Catchment (Central Slovenia). In: Ferreira, C.S.S., Kalantari, Z., Hartmann, T., Pereira, P. (eds) Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_649

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics