Abstract
Increases in the frequency of flood events are one of the major risk factors induced by climate change that lead to a higher vulnerability of affected communities. Natural water retention measures such as afforestation on hillslopes and floodplains are increasingly discussed as cost-effective alternatives to hard engineering structures for providing flood protection, particularly when the evaluation also considers beneficial ecosystem services other than flood protection. The present study provides a combined modelling approach and a cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of the effects of afforestation on peak river flows and on selected ecosystem services within the Glinščica River catchment in Slovenia. In order to investigate these effects, the hydrological model HEC-HMS, the hydraulic model HEC-RAS, and the flood damage model KRPAN, which were developed specifically for Slovenia, are used. Three scenarios were evaluated where the main difference was the extent of afforestation. It was found that increasing the amount of tree cover (i.e., ≈15–60%) results in a flood peak reduction ranging from 9 to 13%. Flood extensions were significantly lower for most scenarios leading to reduced economic losses. However, a 100-year CBA only showed positive net present values (NPV) for one of the considered scenarios, where the afforestation was considered only in floodplain areas and the prevailing benefits were those of flood protection measures, which were higher than, for example, biodiversity or recreational benefits. Additional ecosystem co-benefits that are not directly linked with flood protection are considered in case of all three scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blöschl G, Hall J, Viglione A, Perdigão RA, Parajka J, Merz B et al (2019) Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods. Nature 573(7772):108–111
Stratford C, Miller J, House A, Old G, Acreman M, Duenas-Lopez MA, et al (2017) Do trees in UK-relevant river catchments influence fluvial flood peaks? A systematic review
Nisbet T (2004) Interactions between floodplain woodland and the freshwater environment. Forest Res Ann Rep Accounts 2003(4):32–39
Dittrich R, Ball T, Wreford A, Moran D, Spray CJ (2018) A cost-benefit analysis of afforestation as a climate change adaptation measure to reduce flood risk. J Flood Risk Manage 12:e12482
Vidmar A, Zabret K, Sapač K, Pergar P, Kryžanowski A (2019) Development of an application for estimating the benefits of structural and non-structural measures for flood risk reduction. In: Biondić D, Holjević D, Vizner M (eds.) Croatianwaters in environmental and nature protection: proceedings of 7th Croatian water conference with international participation in Opatija, 30 May-1 June 2019. Grafički zavod Hrvatske, Zagreb, pp 615–624
Bezak N, Šraj M, Rusjan S, Mikoš M (2018) Impact of the rainfall duration and temporal rainfall distribution defined using the huff curves on the hydraulic flood modelling results. Geoscienes 8(2):69
Šraj M, Bezak N, Rusjan S, Mikoš M (2016b) Review of hydrological studies contributing to the advancement of hydrological sciences in Slovenia. Acta Hydrotech 29(50):47–71
Dolšak D, Bezak N, Šraj M (2016) Temporal characteristics of rainfall events under three climate types in Slovenia. J Hydrol 541:1395–1405
Šraj M, Dirnbek L, Brilly M (2010) The influence of effective rainfall on modeled runoff hydrograph. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(1):3–14
Feldman AD (2000) Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: technical reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center
USACE (2016) HEC-RAS river analysis system. Hydraulic reference manual, version 5.0. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute of Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis
Müller A, Knoke T, Olschewski R (2019) Can existing estimates for ecosystem service values inform forest management? Forests 10(2):132
Masiero M, Pettenella D, Boscolo M, Barua SK, Animon I, Matta JR (2019) Valuing forest ecosystem services: a training manual for planners and project developers. Forestry working paper no. 11. Rome, FAO. 216 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
Prostor (2019) Spatial portal of the Republic of Slovenia. http://prostor3.gov.si/ETN-JV/. Accessed Dec 2019
Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529443
Bernal B, Murray LT, Pearson TR (2018) Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities. Carbon Balance Manag 13(1):1–13
IUCN (2018) Global emissions and removals databases. https://infoflr.org/what-flr/global-emissions-and-removals-databases. Accessed Dec 2019
OECD (2016) Effective carbon rates: pricing CO2 through Taxes and emissions trading systems. OECD Publishing, Paris
Ljubljana Tourism (LT) (2019) The path of remembrance and comradeship. https://www.visitljubljana.com/en/visitors/explore/things-to-do/active-holidays/article/the-path-of-remembrance-and-comradeship/. Accessed Dec 2019
Japelj A, Mavsar R, Hodges D, Kovač M, Juvančič L (2016) Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Forest Policy Econ 71:71–79
Tinch R, Thomson C, Dickie I, Leslie R (2010) The economic contribution of the public forest estate in England. In: Report prepared for the Forestry Commission, London (London: eftec)
Broadmeadow S, Nisbet TR (2004) The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice
Ogrinc N, Tamše S, Zavadlav S, Vrzel J, Jin L (2019) Evaluation of geochemical processes and nitrate pollution sources at the Ljubljansko Polje aquifer (Slovenia): a stable isotope perspective. Sci Total Environ 646:1588–1600
Hall JW, Tarantola S, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2005) Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. J Hydraul Eng 131(2):117–126
Acknowledgments
The study was conducted as part of a short-term scientific mission (STSM) within the LAND4FLOOD: Natural Flood Retention on Private Land (CA16209) Cost Action. The study was also conducted as part of the research program P2-0180 financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnen, G., Sapač, K., Rusjan, S., Zupanc, V., Vidmar, A., Bezak, N. (2020). Modelling and Evaluation of the Effect of Afforestation on the Runoff Generation Within the Glinščica River Catchment (Central Slovenia). In: Ferreira, C.S.S., Kalantari, Z., Hartmann, T., Pereira, P. (eds) Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_649
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_649
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77504-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77505-6
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)