Abstract
Remote sensing (RS) has many applications including bathymetry mapping in shallow water areas. It is considered a useful reconnaissance tool to save time and cost to be used in the preliminary survey. In many regions, natural water stream depth changes because of erosion and sedimentation processes and thus bathymetry must be updated regularly. There are several factors to be taken into account when derived water depth using satellite images in shallow water, especially rivers. These factors include the degree of water transparency, water turbidity, nature of river bottom, and reflections from surrounding areas. This chapter aims to assess the performance of three models to determine the bathymetry of Rosetta branch of the Nile River using Landsat-8. The models are tested on a study area that covers 5 km of Rosetta branch. In-situ measurements were acquired by the Nile Research Institute and data are registered to the satellite imagery spatial reference. Landsat-8 image bands are first pre-processed to carry out atmospheric corrections and to mask out land areas and remove scattering and sun specular effects. The tested models are the generalized linear model (GLM), 3rd order polynomial, and the artificial neural networks (ANN). The three models are applied to the pre-processed Landsat-8 image to derive the Rosetta branch bathymetry at the study area. Results showed that the ANN model results are more accurate than both GLM and nonlinear 3rd order polynomial models. However, the results of the three models are not well satisfactory as the root mean square error (RMSE) is about 2 m. The high turbidity of the Rosetta water is one of the main reasons affecting the performance of the three models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Raj A, Sabu P (2013) Shallow water bathymetry using log-linear inversion technique: a case study at Vizhinjam. Int J Innovat Res Sci Eng Technol 2(1):223–230
Pattanaik A, Sahu K, Bhutiyani MR (2015) Estimation of shallow water bathymetry using IRS-multispectral imagery of Odisha Coast India. Aquat Procedia 4(0):173–181
Su H, Liu H, Heyman WD (2008) Automated derivation of bathymetric information from multi-spectral satellite imagery using a non-linear inversion model. Mar Geod 31:281–298
Ehses JS, Rooney JJ (2015) Depth derivation using multispectral WorldView-2 satellite imagery. Civ Environ Eng 24–46 https://www.pifsc.noaa.gov/library/pubs/tech/NOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_46.pdf
Melsheimer C, Chin LS (2001) Extracting bathymetry from multi-temporal SPOT images. Asian Conf Remote Sens 58(12):37–42
Camacho M (2006) Depth analysis of midway atoll using QuickBird multi-spectral imaging over variable substrates. Master’s thesis, Navel Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA
Gao J (2009) Bathymetric mapping by means of remote sensing: methods, accuracy and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 33(1):103–116
Jawak SD, Luis AJ (2016) High-resolution multispectral satellite imagery for extracting bathymetric information of Antarctic shallow lakes. Proceeding of the international society for optical engineering. p 987819
Doxani G, Papadopoulou M, Lafazani P, Pikridas C (2012) Shallow-water bathymetry over variable bottom types using multispectral Worldview-2 image. ISPRS—international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. XXXIX (September), pp 159–164
Lyzenga DR (1978) Passive remote sensing techniques for mapping water depth and bottom features. Appl Opt 17:379–383
Lyzenga DR (1985) Shallow-water bathymetry using combined lidar and passive multispectral scanner data. Int J Remote Sens 6(1):115–125
Lyzenga DR (1981) Remote sensing of bottom reflectance and water attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft and Landsat data. Int J Remote Sens 2(1):71–82
Stumpf RP, Holderied K, Sinclair M (2003) Determination of water depth with high-resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom types. Limonol Oceanogr 48(1_part_2):547–556
Ceyhun Ö, Yalçın A (2010) Remote sensing of water depths in shallow waters via artificial neural networks. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 89(1):89–96
Corucci L (2011) Approaching bathymetry estimation from high resolution multispectral satellite images using a neuro-fuzzy technique. J Appl Remote Sens 5(1):053515
Sari E, Gholamalifard M, Abkar A, Naimi B (2013) Principal components analysis (PCA) in Southern Caspian Sea. Int J Environ 7(4):877–886
Green EP, Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Clark C (1996) A review of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources. Coast Manag 24(1):1–40
Green EP, Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Claek CD (2000) Remote senseing handbook tropical coastal management. Coastal management sourcebook 3, vol X. UNESCO, Paris, p 316
Mishra DR, Narumalani S, Rundquist D, Lawson M (2005) Characterizing the vertical diffuse attenuation coefficient for downwelling irradiance in coastal waters: implications for water penetration by high resolution satellite data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 60(1):48–64
USGS (2015) Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Mohamed H, Negm A, Zahran M, Saavedra OC (2016) Bathymetry determination from high resolution satellite imagery using ensemble learning algorithms in Shallow Lakes: case study El-Burullus Lake. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7(4):295–301
Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Remote sensing of environment summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM +, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113(5):893–903
ENVI (2009) ENVI atmospheric correction module: QUAC and FLAASH User’s guide. ITT Visual Information Solutions
Hochberg EJ, Andréfouët S, Tyler MR (2003) Sea surface correction of high spatial resolution ikonos images to improve bottom mapping in near-shore environments. IEEE Tran Geosci Remote Sens 41(7-PART II):1724–1729
Hedley JD, Harborne AR, Mumby PJ (2005) Technical note: simple and robust removal of sun glint for mapping shallow water benthos. Int J Remote Sens 26(10):2107–2112
Graupe D (2013) Principles of artificial neural networks, 3rd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore
Mohamed H, Negm A, Zahran M, Saavedra OC (2015) Assessment of artificial neural network for bathymetry estimation using High Resolution Satellite imagery in Shallow Lakes: case study El Burullus Lake. In: International water technology conference. pp 12–14
Walker JM (2015) Artificial neural networks, vol 1260, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Yanjiao W, Peiqun Z, Wenjie D, Ying Z (2007) Study on remote sensing of water depths based on BP artificial neural network. Mar Sci Bull 9(1):26–35
Gardner MW, Dorling SR (1998) Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32(14–15):2627–2636
Yu H, Wilamowski BM (2011) Levenberg–Marquardt training, chapter 12. In: Intelligent systems. Industrial electronics handbook, vol. 5, 2nd edn. CRC Press, p 12–1 to 12–15
Elhaddad E, Al-Zyoud S (2017) The quality assessment of pollution of Rosetta branch, Nile River, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 10:97. doi:10.1007/s12517-017-2870-y
Alawy AE, El-tras WF, Khater DF, El Raiy HR (2015) Impact of industrial wastewater on water and fish quality of Nile River in Kafr El-Zayat, Egypt. BENHA Vet Med J 78:87
Ezzat SM, Mahdy HM, Abo-State MA, Abd El Shakour EH, El-Banhnasawy MA (2012) Water quality assessment of River Nile at Rosetta Branch: impact of drains discharge. Middle-East J Sci Res 12(4):413–423
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Negm, A., Mesbah, S., Abdelaziz, T., Makboul, O. (2017). Nile River Bathymetry by Satellite Remote Sensing Case Study: Rosetta Branch. In: Negm, A. (eds) The Nile River. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 56. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59086-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59088-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)