pp 1-20 | Cite as

Potential Role of Intercropping in Maintaining and Facilitating Environmental Sustainability

Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series

Abstract

Intercropping plays an important role in increasing productivity and achieving sustainability in agriculture and animal production by accounting for social, economic, and environmental considerations. This approach should be the basis of any economic construction, particularly in developing countries such as Egypt. Intercropping improves the use efficiency of land and available resources (water, light, and nutrients) through the different stages of growth. Furthermore, intercropping is a proven method to deter pests, encourage the proliferation of their natural enemies, reduce disease and insect injury, and inhibit weed growth through a “push–pull” system, making it an important aspect of sustainable agriculture. Integration and facilitation of available resources can occur through the different stages of growth in several intercropping systems. Also, the benefits from intercropping for a unit area can be maximized through the activity of microorganisms and nitrogen fixation to obtain a land equivalent ratio greater than 1. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) molecular marker profiling has been used to fingerprint the 16S rRNA gene and identify the relative abundance of bacterial populations in the rhizosphere of intercropping patterns. This can reduce nitrate washing, as well as the risk of groundwater contamination by nitrates.

Keywords

Crop productivity Environmental resources Intercropping patterns Nitrogen fixation Pest control Sustainability 

References

  1. 1.
    FAO (2017) Food insecurity strains deepen amid civil conflict and drought. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/892734/icode
  2. 2.
    FAO/SOFA (2014) The State of Food and Agriculture 2014. In brief, innovation in family farming, Rome. http://www.fao.org/publications/sofa
  3. 3.
    Stagnari F, Maggio A, Galien A, Pisante M (2017) Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chem Biol Technol Agric 4(2):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0085-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous (2014) Intercropping soybeans with maize. Agricultural extension version, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Field Crops Research Institute (FCRI), Crop Intensification Research Department. http://www.caaes.org/posts/595918
  5. 5.
    Awaad HA, El-Naggar NZ (2016) Breeding crop for the convenience of intercropping. The Egyptian Library for Publishing and Distribution, GizaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Othman AZ, Hassan AA (2016) Impact of intercropping system on Egyptian food security and balance of trade. Int J ChemTech Res 9(12):100–107Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Megawer Ekram A, Sharaan AN, EL-Sherif AM (2010) Effect of intercropping patterns on yield and its components of barley, lupin and chickpea in new reclaimed soil. Egypt J Appl Sci 25(9):437–452Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghanbari A, Dahmardeh M, Siahsar BA, Ramroudi M (2010) Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) – cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in and environment. J Food Agric Environ 8:102–108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abdel-Wahab TI, El-Rahman RAA (2016) Response of some soybean cultivars to low light intensity under different intercropping patterns with maize. Int J Appl Agric Sci 2(2):21–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urbatzka P, Graβ R, Haase T (2009) Fate of legume-derived nitrogen in monocultures and mixtures with cereals. Agric Ecosyst Environ 132:116–125Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Callaway RM (2007) Direct mechanisms for facilitation. In: Callaway RM (ed) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 15–59Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang F, Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248(1–2):305–312Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malezieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. Agron Sustain Dev 29:43–62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moshira El-Shamy A, Abdel-Wahab TI, Abdel-Wahab SI, Ragheb SB (2015) Advantages of intercropping soybean with maize under two maize plant distributions and three mineral nitrogen fertilizer rates. Adv Biosci Bioeng 3(4):30–48Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2001) Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crop Res 72(3):185–196Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh DK, Agrawal RL (2004) Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) grown in sole and intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Indian J Agron 49(3):151–153Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheha AM, Abdel-Wahab TI, Abdel-Wahab SI (2015) Maximizing nitrogen and land use efficiencies of intercropped wheat with pea under different pea sowing dates. J Plant Sci 3(6):358–371Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cong WF, Hoffland E, Li L, Six J, Sun JH, Bao XG, Zhang FS, Van Der Werf W (2015) Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Glob Chang Biol 21(4):1715–1726Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang DM, Marschner P, Solaiman Z, Rengel Z (2007) Growth, P uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped wheat and chickpea in soil amended with iron phosphate or phytate. Soil Biol Biochem 39:249–256Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inal A, Gunes A, Zhang F, Cakmak I (2007) Peanut/maize intercropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiol Biochem 45:350–356Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitmore AP, Schröder JJ (2007) Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: a modelling study. Eur J Agron 27:81–88Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaiser T, Barros ID, Lange FM, Williams HR (2004) Water use efficiency of a maize/cowpea intercrop on a highly acidic tropical soil as affected by liming and fertilizer application. Plant Soil 263(1):165–171Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lamlom MM, Abdel-Wahab Sh I, Abdel-Wahab TI, Gendy EK (2015) Residual effects of some preceded winter field crops on productivity of intercropped soybean with three maize cultivars. Am J Biosci 3(6):226–242Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu T, Li C, Ma X, Zhao X, Liu S (2008) Effects of maize intercropping with different genotypes on leaf senescence and grain yield and quality. Acta Phytoecol Sin 32(4):914–921Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun YM, Zhang NN, Wang ET, Yuan HL, Yang JS, Chen WX (2009) Influence of intercropping and intercropping plus rhizobial inoculation on microbial activity and community composition in rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Siberian wild rye (Elymus sibiricus L.) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:62–70Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li YY, Yu CB, Cheng X, Li CJ, Sun JH et al (2009) Intercropping alleviates the inhibitory effect of N fertilization on nodulation and symbiotic N2 fixation of faba bean. Plant Soil 323:295–308Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hassanein AHA, Khalefa AM, Awaad MS and Negm MA (2017) Different applications of nitrogen and phosphorus to soybean and maize under intercropping systems in a calcareous soil. http://www.arc.sci.eg/NARIMS_upload/.../81694/DIFFER~1%20(2)
  28. 28.
    Abd El-Gaid MA, Al-Dokeshy MH, DMT Nassef (2014) Effects of intercropping system of tomato and common bean on growth, yield components and land equivalent ratio in new valley governorate. Research Article Science Alert. http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajcs.2014.254.261Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pretty J, Bharucha ZP (2015) Integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa. Insects 6(1):152–182Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khan RZ, Midega CAO, Pittchar JO, Pickett JA (2014) Push–Pull: a novel IPM strategy for the green revolution in Africa. Integrated pest management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 333–348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7802-3_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rodenburg J, Cissoko M, Kayeke J, Dieng I, Khan ZR, Midega CAO, Onyuka EA, Scholes JD (2015) Do NERICA rice cultivars express resistance to Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. and Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze under field conditions. Field Crops Res 170:83–89Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tamiru A, Khan ZR, Bruce TJA (2015) New directions for improving crop resistance to insects by breeding for egg induced defence. Curr Opin Insect Sci 9:51–55Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mousa GM (2005) Effect of intercropping of some medical and aromatic plants with bean on their infestation with some pests. Zagazig J Agric Res 32(3):1495–1520Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamd Alla WA, Shalaby EM, Dawood RA, Zohry AA (2014) Effect of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) with maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping on yield and its components. Int Sch Sci Res Innov 8(11):1258–1264Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abdullah SS, Fouad HA (2016) Effect of intercropping agroecosystem on the population of black legume aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch and yield of faba bean crop. J Entomol Zool Stud 4(4):1367–1371Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Selim MSM, Mohamed NA, Shams SAA (2000) Effect of some intercropping patterns and plant density on growth and yield of faba bean Vicia faba L. with canola Brassica napus L. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor 38(4):1811–1824Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Montaser FA, Abo-Elyousr KAM (2012) Effect of preceding and intercropping crops on suppression of lentil damping-off and root rot disease in New Valley – Egypt. Crop Prot 32:41–46Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mousa AM, El-Sayed SA (2016) Effect of intercropping and phosphorus fertilizer treatments on incidence of Rhizoctonia root-rot disease of faba bean. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 5(4):850–863Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mundt CC, Brophy LS, Schmitt MS (2007) Disease severity and yield of pure-line wheat cultivars and mixtures in the presence of eyespot, yellow rust, and their combination. Plant Pathol 44(1):173–182Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abouziena HF, El-Karamany MF, Singh M, Sharma SD (2007) Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control treatments on maize yield and associated weeds in sandy soils. Weed Technol 21:1049–1053Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abd El-Samad GA, El-Bially ME, Saudy HS (2012) Response of maize and associated weeds to weed management and nitrogen rates. J Biol Chem Environ Sci 7(4):342–358Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS, Soad El-Ashry M (2009) Response of maize and associated weeds to irrigation intervals, weed management and nitrogen forms. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 34(5):5003–5017Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lawson YDI, Dzomeku IK, Asempa R, Benson S (2006) Weed control in maize using Mucuna and Canavalia as intercrops in the Northern Guinea Savanna zone of Ghana. J Agron 5:621–625Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baumann DT, Kropff MJ, Bastiaans L (2000) Intercropping leeks to suppress weeds. Weed Res 40:359–374Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Josefina S, Diego R, Fenández-Aparicio M (2007) Intercropping with cereals reduces infection By Orobanche crenata in legumes. Crop Prot 26:1166–1172Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bakheit BR, Allam AY, Galal AH (2001) Intercropping faba bean with some legume crops for control of Orobanche crenata. Acta Agron Hung 2002(50):1–6Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM (2009) Weed management under different patterns of sun flowers-soybean intercropping. J Cent Eur Agric 10(1):41–52Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zohry AA (2005) Effect of preceding winter crops and intercropping on yield, yield components and associated weeds in maize. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor Univ 43:139–148Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Willey RM (1979) Intercropping, its importance and research needs, competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstr 32:1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crop Science Department, Faculty of AgricultureZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations