Abstract
Mercury (Hg) is a global pollutant with different highly toxic chemical forms that can be bioaccumulated and biomagnified. Up to now most studies on Hg pollution have focused on aquatic ecosystems, and this is why little information about Hg in terrestrial ecosystems is currently available. However, the impact of Hg pollution on the terrestrial environment and food chain is of great interest for its human health implications. In this context, earthworms, which constitute a major component in soil ecosystems and act as a food source for a wide variety of organisms, are an excellent option to study Hg biochemistry in terrestrial ecosystems. The use of earthworms as bioindicators of Hg soil pollution involves a wide number of variables to be considered since the metal–biota interaction is very complicated in this case. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to review the role of earthworms as bioindicators of Hg pollution in soils.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bank MS (2012) Mercury in the environment: pattern and process, 1st edn. University of California Press, California
Seigneur C, Vijayaraghavan K, Lohman K, Karamchandani P, Scott C (2004) Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the united states. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):555–569
Swartzendruber P, Jaffe D (2012) Sources and transport: a global issue. In: Bank MS (ed) Mercury in the environment: pattern and process. University of California Press, California, pp 3–18
Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006) The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 36(8):609–662
USEPA (2001) Water quality criterion for the protection of human health: methylmercury. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
EU (2006) Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Commission Regulation no. 1881/2006. Offi J Eur Union
WHO (2011) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Seventy-second report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organization
Hintelmann H (2010) Organomercurials. Their formation and pathways in the environment. Met Ions Life Sci 7:365–401
UNEP (2013) Minamata convention on mercury. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Portals/11/documents/publications/MinamataConventiontextEn.pdf
Lanno R, Wells J, Conder J, Bradham K, Basta N (2004) The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for earthworms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57(1):39–47
Lionetto MG, Calisi A, Schettino T (2012) Earthworms biomarkers as tools for soil pollution assessment. Soil Health Land Use Manage 305–332
Sizmur T, Hodson ME (2009) Do earthworms impact metal mobility and availability in soil? - a review. Environ Pollut 157(7):1981–1989
Fruend H-C, Butt K, Capowiez Y, Eisenhauer N, Emmerling C, Ernst G, Potthoff M, Schaedler M, Schrader S (2010) Using earthworms as model organisms in the laboratory: recommendations for experimental implementations. Pedobiol 53(2):119–125. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2009.07.002
Salminen R, Batista MJ, Bidovec M, Demetriades A, De Vivo B, De Vos W, Duris M, Gilucis A, Gregorauskiene V, Halamic J, Heitzmann P, Lima A, Jordan G, Klaver G, Klein P, Lis J, Locutura J, Marsina K, Mazreku A, O’Connor PJ, Olsson SÅ, Ottesen R-T, Petersell V, Plant JA, Reeder S, Salpeteur I, Sandström H, Siewers U, Steenfelt A, (2005) Geochemical atlas of europe, part 1, background information, methodology and maps, vol 1. FOREGS
Teršič T, Gosar M, Biester H (2011) Distribution and speciation of mercury in soil in the area of an ancient mercury ore roasting site, Frbejžene trate (Idrija area, Slovenia). J Geochem Explor 110(2):136–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.05.002
Teršič T, Gosar M (2012) Comparison of elemental contents in earthworm cast and soil from a mercury-contaminated site (Idrija area, Slovenia). Sci Total Environ 430(0):28–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.062
EAW (2002) Soil guideline values for inorganic mercury contamination. Environment agency of England and Wales. R&D Publication, Swindon
CEAA (1995) Toxicity testing of national contaminated sites remediation program priority substances for the development of soil quality guidelines for contaminated sites. Evaluation and interpretation branch, guidelines division. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency - Environment Canada, Ottawa
Meili M (1991) The coupling of mercury and organic-matter in the biogeochemical cycle - towards a mechanistic model for the boreal forest zone. Water Air Soil Pollut 56:333–347. doi:10.1007/bf00342281
Tipping E, Lofts S, Hooper H, Frey B, Spurgeon D, Syendsen C (2010) Critical Limits for Hg(II) in soils, derived from chronic toxicity data. Environ Pollut 158(7):2465–2471. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.03.027
Ravichandran M (2004) Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review. Chemosphere 55(3):319–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011
de Vries W, Lofts S, Tipping E, Meili M, Groenenberg JE, Schütze G (2007) Impact of soil properties on critical concentrations of cadmium, lead, copper, zinc, and mercury in soil and soil solution in view of ecotoxicological effects. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 191:42. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-69163-3_3
Ernst G, Zimmermann S, Christie P, Frey B (2008) Mercury, cadmium and lead concentrations in different ecophysiological groups of earthworms in forest soils. Environ Pollut 156(3):1304–1313. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.03.002
Burton DT, Turley SD, Fisher DJ, Green DJ, Shedd TR (2006) Bioaccumulation of total mercury and monomethylmercury in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Water Air Soil Pollut 170(1–4):37–54. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-3113-0
Zagury GJ, Neculita C-M, Bastien C, Deschênes L (2006) Mercury fractionation, bioavailability, and ecotoxicity in highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(4):1138–1147. doi:10.1897/05-302r.1
Nahmani J, Hodson ME, Black S (2007) A review of studies performed to assess metal uptake by earthworms. Environ Pollut 145(2):402–424. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.009
Rieder SR, Brunner I, Horvat M, Jacobs A, Frey B (2011) Accumulation of mercury and methylmercury by mushrooms and earthworms from forest soils. Environ Pollut 159(10):2861–2869
Zhang ZS, Zheng DM, Wang QC, Lv XG (2009) Bioaccumulation of total and methyl mercury in three earthworm species (Drawida sp., Allolobophora sp., and Limnodrilus sp.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 83(6):937–942. doi:10.1007/s00128-009-9872-8
Hinton JJ, Veiga MM (2009) Using earthworms to assess Hg distribution and bioavailability in gold mining soils. Soil Sedim Contam 18(4):512–524. doi:10.1080/15320380902978847
van Straalen NM, Donker MH, Vijver MG, van Gestel CAM (2005) Bioavailability of contaminants estimated from uptake rates into soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut 136(3):409–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.019
ASTM (1999) Standard guide for conducting a laboratory soil toxicity test with the lumbricid earthworm Eisenia foetida. Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA
OECD (2004) Test No. 222: earthworm reproduction test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei). OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals. OECD Publishing, Paris
ISO (1993) Soil quality-effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 1: determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrate, vol 11268–1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve
ISO (1998) Soil quality- effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 2: determination of effects on reproduction, vol 11268–2. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve
ISO (2006) Soil quality-sampling of soil invertebrates (I): hand-sorting and formalin extraction of earthworms. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Gudbrandsen M, Sverdrup LE, Aamodt S, Stenersen J (2007) Short-term pre-exposure increases earthworm tolerance to mercury. Eur J Soil Biol 43(Suppl 1):S261–S267
Lock K, Janssen C (2001) Ecotoxicity of mercury to Eisenia fetida, Enchytraeus albidus and Folsomia candida. Biol Fertil Soils 34(4):219–221. doi:10.1007/s003740100392
Kammenga JE, Dallinger R, Donker MH, Köhler HR, Simonsen V, Triebskorn R, Weeks JM (2000) Biomarkers in terrestrial invertebrates for ecotoxicological soil risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 164:93–147
Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Weeks JM (2000) Biomarkers in earthworms. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 165:117–159
Sanchez-Hernandez JC (2006) Earthworm biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 188:85–126
Rodríguez-Castellanos L, Sanchez-Hernandez JC (2007) Earthworm biomarkers of pesticide contamination: current status and perspectives. J Pestic Sci 32(4):360–371
Fugère N, Brousseau P, Krzystyniak K, Coderre D, Fournier M (1996) Heavy metal-specific inhibition of phagocytosis and different in vitro sensitivity of heterogeneous coelomocytes from Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta). Toxicology 109(2–3):157–166
Svendsen C, Hankard PK, Lister LJ, Fishwick SK, Jonker MJ, Spurgeon DJ (2007) Effect of temperature and season on reproduction, neutral red retention and metallothionein responses of earthworms exposed to metals in field soils. Environ Pollut 147(1):83–93
Calisi A, Lionetto MG, Sanchez-Hernandez JC, Schettino T (2011) Effect of heavy metal exposure on blood haemoglobin concentration and methemoglobin percentage in Lumbricus terrestris. Ecotoxicology 20(4):847–854
Colacevich A, Sierra MJ, Borghini F, Milian R, Sanchez-Hernandez JC (2011) Oxidative stress in earthworms short- and long-term exposed to highly Hg-contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 194:135–143. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.091
Calisi A, Zaccarelli N, Lionetto MG, Schettino T (2013) Integrated biomarker analysis in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: application to the monitoring of soil heavy metal pollution. Chemosphere 90(11):2637–2644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.040
Berzas Nevado JJ, Rodríguez Martin-Doimeadios RC, Guzman Bernardo FJ, Rodriguez Alvarez C (2014) Determination of total glutathione in earthworms by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Analyt Method. doi:10.1039/c4ay00085d
OECD (1984) Test No. 207: earthworm, acute toxicity tests. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. OECD Publishing, Paris
Calisi A, Lionetto MG, Schettino T (2009) Pollutant-induced alterations of granulocyte morphology in the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(5):1369–1377
Calisi A, Lionetto MG, Schettino T (2011) Biomarker response in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris exposed to chemical pollutants. Sci Total Environ 409(20):4456–4464
Lionetto MG, Caricato R, Calisi A, Giordano ME, Schettino T (2013) Acetylcholinesterase as a biomarker in environmental and occupational medicine: new insights and future perspectives. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/321213
Frasco MF, Colletier JP, Weik M, Carvalho F, Guilhermino L, Stojan J, Fournier D (2007) Mechanisms of cholinesterase inhibition by inorganic mercury. FEBS J 274(7):1849–1861
Beliaeff B, Burgeot T (2002) Integrated biomarker response: a useful tool for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(6):1316–1322
Hinton JJ, Veiga JM (2008) The influence of organic acids on mercury bioavailability: insight from an earthworm assessment protocol. Environ Bioindicat 3:47–67
Rieder SR, Brunner I, Daniel O, Liu B, Frey B (2013) Methylation of mercury in earthworms and the effect of mercury on the associated bacterial communities. PLoS One 8(4). 10.1371/journal.pone.0061215
Kaschak E, Knopf B, Petersen JH, Bings NH, König H (2014) Biotic methylation of mercury by intestinal and sulfate-reducing bacteria and their potential role in mercury accumulation in the tissue of the soil-living Eisenia foetida. Soil Biol Biochem 69(0):202–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.11.004
Drake HL, Horn MA (2007) As the worm turns: the earthworm gut as a transient habitat for soil microbial biomes. Annu Rev Microbiol 61:169–189
Gilmour CC, Elias DA, Kucken AM, Brown SD, Palumbo AV, Schadt CW, Wall JD (2011) Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(12):3938–3951
Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA Jr, Smith SD, Tomanicek SJ, Qian Y, Brown SD, Brandt CC, Palumbo AV, Smith JC, Wall JD, Elias DA, Liang L (2013) The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 339(6125):1332–1335
Dröge S, Limper U, Emtiazi F, Schönig I, Pavlus N, Drzyzga O, Fischer U, König H (2005) In vitro and in vivo sulfate reduction in the gut contents of the termite Mastotermes darwiniensis and the rose-chafer Pachnoda marginata. J Gen Appl Microbiol 51(2):57–64
Limper U, Knopf B, König H (2008) Production of methyl mercury in the gut of the Australian termite Mastotermes darwiniensis. J Appl Entomol 132(2):168–176
Gnamus A, Byrne AR, Horvat M (2000) Mercury in the soil-plant-deer-predator food chain of a temperate forest in Slovenia. Environ Sci Tech 34(16):3337–3345. doi:10.1021/es991419w
Cristol DA, Brasso RL, Condon AM, Fovargue RE, Friedman SL, Hallinger KK, Monroe AP, White AE (2008) The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs. Science 320(5874):335. doi:10.1126/science.1154082
Berzas Nevado JJ, Rodríguez Martin-Doimeadios RC, Mateo R, Rodríguez Fariñas N, Rodriguez-Estival J, Patiño Ropero MJ (2012) Mercury exposure and mechanism of response in large game using the Almaden mercury mining area (Spain) as a case study. Environ Res 112:58–66. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.09.019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadiós, R.C., Guzmán Bernardo, F.J., Rodríguez Fariñas, N., Jiménez Moreno, M. (2014). The Role of Earthworms in Mercury Pollution Soil Assessment. In: Jiménez, E., Cabañas, B., Lefebvre, G. (eds) Environment, Energy and Climate Change I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2014_271
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2014_271
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12906-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12907-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)