Skip to main content

Two Sides of One Coin: Relations Between Hazardous Substances and Valuable Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1442 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 23))

Abstract

Many hazardous substances of today had been looked at as valuable chemicals some decades ago. At present, management especially in the case of scarce, non-renewable resources is of growing importance. The experiences collected with the management of contaminants might be helpful also for valuable resources. This is demonstrated using two well-documented examples, Cd and PCBs. Pt serves as a counterexample to prove if the DPSIR method can be applied to contaminants and resources without fundamental changes. Some of the countermeasures introduced to control environmental contaminants may also be applied to save non-renewable resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UN (1992) AGENDA 21, The United Nations Program of Action from Rio. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml. Accessed 21 June 2011

  2. Enquete Commission (1998) The concept of sustainability. From vision to reality. Deutscher Bundestag (ed). Economica Verlag, Bonn. ISBN 3-930341-45-X

    Google Scholar 

  3. SRU – Rat von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen (2002) Umweltgutachten 2002, Deutscher Bundestag, BT-Drs. 14/8792, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. EC (2010) Critical raw materials for the EU – Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. DG Enterprise and Industry, 30 July 2010, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  5. EC (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Tackling the Challenges in Commodity Markets and on Raw Materials, KOM (2011) 25 final, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friege H (2012) Resource recovery from used electric and electronic equipment: alternative options for resource conservation, Waste Mgt Res 30(9)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friege H (2012) Ressourcenschonung am Beispiel der Elektro- und Elektronikaltgeräte II. Ansätze für einen effizienteren Umgang mit nicht erneuerbaren Ressourcen. Müll und Abfall 44(6):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  8. Böhm E, Tötsch W (1989) Cadmium-Substitution: Stand und Perspektiven, ISBN 3-88585-629-8, Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  9. BGK – Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost (2008) Cadmium-arme Rohphosphate begrenzt. http://www.kompost.de/uploads/media/Cadmiumarme_Rohphoshate_2_08_44f.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2011

  10. EFSA – European Food Safety Authority (2009) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in food. EFSA J 980(2009):1–139

    Google Scholar 

  11. BfR – Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (2009) Cadmium in Lebensmitteln, Berlin. ISBN 3-938163-50-X

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lig R, Held M (2009) Cadmium flows in Europe. Rev Met Paris 106(12):559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. EC (2006) Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC. OJ L 266, 26 Sep 2006, 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. EC (2002) Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. OJ L 37, 13 Feb 2003, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  15. EC (2011) Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electric and electronic equipment. OJ L 174, 88–110

    Google Scholar 

  16. UBA – Umweltbundesamt (2011) Batterierecycling in Deutschland, Rücknahme und Verwertungsergebnisse 2009. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/abfallwirtschaft/publikationen/papier_batterierecycling_in_deutschland_ruecknahme_und_verwertungsergebnisse_2009.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2012

  17. UBA – Umweltbundesamt (2006) Batterien und Akkus – das wollten Sie wissen. http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3057.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2010

  18. EC (2012) Directive 2012/…/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) – Recast. http://www.dataserv-gmbh.de/wer_wir_sind/news_DE.html. Accessed 15 June 2012

  19. Kummer B (2011) Resolar-Projekt mit interessanten Ergebnissen abgeschlossen. Müll und Abfall 43(5):23–240

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bräutigam KR, Achternbosch M, Hartlieb N, Kupsch C, Sardemann G (2008): Ressourcen- und Abfallmanagement von Cadmium in Deutschland, FZKA-Bericht 7315, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  21. PRTR (2011) http://www.prtr.bund.de/frames/index.php?PHPSESSID=5a7510dc0216fbcede1064b87c2fec21%26gui_id=PRTR. Accessed 15 Apr 2012

  22. Rotter VS (2004) Schwermetalle in Haushaltsabfällen. Müll Handbuch (Eds.: Bilitewski B, Schnurer H, Zeschmar-Lahl B) Kz. 2829, Lfg. 1/04

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morf LS, Brunner PH, Spaun S (2000) Effect of operating conditions and input variations on the partitioning of metals in a MSWI. Waste Manag Res 18(1):4–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Astrup T, Riber C, Pedersen AJ (2011) Incinerator performance: effects of changes in waste input and furnace operation on air emissions and residues. Waste Manag Res 29(10 Suppl):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fehrenbach H, Giegrich J, Möhler S (2007) Behandlungsalternativen für klimarelevante Stoffströme, UBA-Texte 39/07, ISSN 1862–4804, Dessau

    Google Scholar 

  26. UBA – Umweltbundesamt (2011) http://www.umweltbundesamt-daten-zur-umwelt.de/umweltdaten/public/document/downloadImage.do;jsessionid=6A2F3FBE121EF5EDAD6E8A47CCABBA25?ident=20087. Accessed 24 Mar 2012

  27. Achternbosch M, Kupsch C, Sardemann G, Bräutigam KR (2009) Cadmium flows caused by the worldwide production of primary zinc metal. J Ind Ecol 13(3):438–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. BfR – Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (2010) Aufnahme von Umweltkontaminanten über Lebensmittel, ISBN 3-938163-70-4, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fürst P (2006) Dioxins, PCB, and other organohalogen compounds in human milk. Mol Nutr Food Res 50:922–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. EC (1976) Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations. OJ L 262, 27 Sept 1976, 0201–0203

    Google Scholar 

  31. EC (1985) Council Directive 85/467/EEC of 1 October 1985 amending for the sixth time (PCBs/PCTs) Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations. OJ L 269, 11 Oct 1985, 56–58

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rauhut A (1982), quoted after Friege H, Nagel R (1982) Umweltgift PCB, BUND-Information 21, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  33. EC (1986) Council Directive 87/101/EEC of 22 December 1986 amending directive 75/439/EEC on the disposal of waste oils, OJ L 042, 12 Feb 1987, 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bonk L, Böckler M, Göller F, Jasny W, Tigges E (2011) Einsatz, Entsorgung und Recycling PCB-haltiger Bauteile und Komponenten der Elektrotechnik. Gefahrstoffe – Reinhaltung der Luft 71 (1/2), 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  35. LANUV (2011) http://www.lanuv.nrw.de/umwelt/stoerfaelle/anlagen.htm#m2. Accessed 24 Mar 2012

  36. EC (2002) Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). OJ L 37, 13 Feb 2003, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  37. EEA – European Environmental Agency (2003) Waste from electric and electronic equipment – quantities, dangerous substances and treatment methods. http://eea.eionet.europa.eu/Public/irc/eionet-circle/etc_waste/library?l=/working_papers/weeepdf/_EN_1.0_&a=d. Accessed 12 Nov 2010

  38. Cuhls C (2000): Stoffstrombilanzierung bei der Aufbereitung von Altfahrzeugen und Elektronikschrott in Shredderanlagen, in Abfallvermeidung und –verwertung, Deponietechnik und Altlastensanierung (Eds.: Hengerer et al.), ISBN 90 5809 181 3, 189–194, Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  39. Deutscher Bundestag (2011) Bericht der Bundesregierung zu den abfallwirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen der §§ 9–13 des ElektroG, BT-Drs. 17/4517, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  40. BR – Bezirksregierung Arnsberg (2010) http://www.bezreg-arnsberg.nrw.de/presse/2010/12/204_10/index.php. Accessed 7 Jan 2012

  41. BR – Bezirksregierung Münster (2011) http://www.bezreg-muenster.nrw.de/startseite/presse/pressearchiv/2011/20110216_Bezirksregierung_Muenster_legt_AGR_Zwischenlager_Gelsenkirchen_wegen_PCB_Belastung_still/index.html. Accessed 7 Jan 2012

  42. EEA – European Environmental Agency (2010) http://sia.eionet.europa.eu/Indicators. Accessed 5 Apr 2012

  43. EEA – European Environmental Agency (2003) Environmental indicators, typology and use in reporting. http://eea.eionet.europa.eu/Public/irc/eionet-circle/core_set/library?l=/management_documentation/indicator_typology/_EN_1.0_&a=d. Accessed 20 Jan 2011

  44. Bringezu S, Bleischwitz R (2009) Sustainable resource management. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield. ISBN 9781906093266

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thorenz A, Reller A (2011) Discussion of risks of platinum resources based on a function oriented criticality assessment. Environ Sci Eur 23:26, 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  46. Angerer G, Marscheider-Weidemann F, Lüllmann A, Erdmann L, Scharp M, Handke V, Marwede M (2009) Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien. Einfluss des branchenspezifischen Rohstoffbedarfs in rohstoffintensiven Zukunftstechnologien auf die zukünftige Rohstoffnachfrage (Hrsg.: BMFT), ISBN 978-3-8167-7957-5, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  47. Buchert M, Schüler D, Bleher D (2009) Critical metals for future sustainable technologies and their recycling potential (Ed.: UNEP-DTIE), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  48. Friege H (2012) The role of waste management in the control of hazardous substances: lessons learned, Beiträge zu Abfallwirtschaft/Altlasten Bd. 87, ISBN 978-3-934253-80-3, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henning Friege .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friege, H. (2012). Two Sides of One Coin: Relations Between Hazardous Substances and Valuable Resources. In: Bilitewski, B., Darbra, R., Barceló, D. (eds) Global Risk-Based Management of Chemical Additives II. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2012_188

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics