Skip to main content

Antibacterial Bioactive Glass, S53P4, for Chronic Bone Infections – A Multinational Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Modern Approach to Biofilm-Related Orthopaedic Implant Infections

Abstract

Osteomyelitis is an infectious process in bone that occasionally leads to bone destruction. Traditionally, the surgical treatment procedure is performed in combination with systemic and local antibiotics as a two-stage procedure that uses autograft or allograft bone for filling of the cavitary defect. Bioactive glass (BAG-S53P4) is a bone substitute with proven antibacterial and bone bonding properties.

One hundred and sixteen patients who had verified chronic osteomyelitis was treated using BAG-S53P4 as part of the treatment. Most of the patients had previously undergone numerous procedures, sometimes for decades. A register of patient data obtained from 11 centers from Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Germany, Azerbaijan and Poland was set-up and continuously maintained at Helsinki University Central Hospital.

The location of the osteomyelitis was mainly in the tibia followed by the femur and then the calcaneus. The median age of the patients was 48 years (15–87). The patients were either treated according to a one-stage procedure without local antibiotics (85 %) or by a two-stage procedure using antibiotic beads in the first procedure (15 %). The minimum follow-up was 1 year (12–95 months, median 31).

The cure rate was 104/116, the total success rate 90 % and most of the patients showed a rapid recovery.

The study shows that (BAG-S53P4) can be used in a one-stage procedure in treatment of osteomyelitis with excellent results.

The original version of this chapter has been revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_13

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/5584_2017_13

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cierny G 3rd, Mader JT, Pennick JJ (2003) A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coraca-Huber D, Fille M, Hausdorfer J, Putzer D, Nogler M (2014) Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro. J Orthop Res 32:175–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drago L, Romano D, De Vecchi E, Vassena C, Logoluso N, Mattina R, Romano CL (2013) Bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 for the adjunctive treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the long bone: an in vitro and prospective clinical study. BMC Infect Dis 10:584. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drago L, Vassena C, Fenu S, De Vecchi E, Signori V, De Francesco R, Romano CL (2014) In vitro antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P4. Future Microbiol 9:593–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drago L, De Vecchi E, Bortolin M, Toscano M, mattina R, Romano CL (2015) Antimicrobila activity and resistance selection of different bioglass S53P4 formulations against multidrug resistance strains. Future Microbiol 10:1293–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frantzén J, Rantakokko J, Aro H, Heinänen J, Kajander S, Koski I, Gullichsen E, Kotilainen E, Lindfors N (2011) Instrumented spondylodesis in degenerative spondylolisthesis with bioactive glass and autologous bone. A prospective 11-year follow-up. J Spinal Disorder Tech 24(7):455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä JT, Kukkonen J, Aho AJ, Moisander S, Kyyrönen T, Mattila K (2011) Bioactive glass granules: a suitable bone substitute material in the operative treatment of depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures: a prospective, randomized 1 year follow-up study. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22(4):1073–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini L, Mader JT, Cahoun JH (2004) Osteomyelitis in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:2305–2318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini L, Lipsky BA, Mader JT (2005) Antibiotic treatment of osteomyelitis: what have we learned from 30 years of clinical trials? Int J Inf Dis 9:127–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindfors NC, Heikkilä J, Koski I, Mattila K, Aho AJ (2009) Bioactive glass and autogenous bone as bone graft substitutes in benign bone tumors. J Biomed Mater Res 90B(1):131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindfors NC, Koski I, Heikkilä JT, Mattila K, Aho AJ (2010a) A prospective randomized 14-year follow-up study of bioactive glass and autogenous bone as bone graft substitutes in benign bone tumors. J Biomed Mater Res 94B(1):157–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindfors NC, Hyvönen P, Nyyssönen M, Kirjavainen M, Kankare J, Gullichsen E, Salo J (2010b) Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis. Bone 47:212–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leppäranta O, Vaahtio M, Peltola R, Ziang D, Hupa L, Hupa M, Ylänen H, Salonen JI, Viljanen MK, Eerola E (2008) Antibacterial effect of bioactive glasses on clinically important anaerobic bacteria in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:547–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom O, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M (2003) Periprosthetic total hip infection. Outcome using a staging system. Vlin Orthop Relat Res 403:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munukka E, Leppäranta O, Korkeamäki M, Vaahto M, Peltola T, Zhang D, Hupa L, Ylänen H, salonen JI, Virtanen MK, Eerola E (2008) Bacterial effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peltola M, Aitasalo K, Suonpaa J, Varpula M, Yli-Urpo A (2006) Bioactive glass S53P4 in frontal sinus obliteration: A long-term clinical experience. Head Neck 28(9):834–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pernaa K, Koski I, Mattila K, Gullichsen E, Heikkilä J, Aho AJ, Lindfors N (2011) Bioactive glass S53P4 and autograft bone in treatment of depressed tibial plateau fractures. A prospective randomized 11-year follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Impl 21(2): 139–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rantakokko J, Frantzén J, Heinänen J, Kajander S, Kotilainen E, Gullichsen E, Lindfors N (2012) Posterolateral spondylodesis using bioactive glass S53P4 and autogenous bone in instrumented unstable lumbar spine burst fractures – a prospective 10-year follow-up study. Scand J Surg 101:66–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romano CL, Logoluso N, Meani E, Romano D, De Vecchi E, Vassena C, Drago L (2014) A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. Bone Joint J 96-B:845–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin J, Grenman R, Aitasalo K, Pulkkinen J (2012) Bioactive glass S53P4 in mastoid obliteration surgery for chronic otitis media and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121:563–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silvola JT (2011) Mastoidectomy cavity obliteration with bioactive glass: a Pilot Study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(2):P96–P97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoor P, Mesimäki K, Lindqvist C, Kontio R (2015) The use of anatomically drop-shaped bioactive glass S53P4 implants in the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures-A prospective long-term follow-up study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:969–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Virolainen P, Heikkilä J, Yli-Urpo A, Vuorio E, Aro HT (1997) Histomorphometric and molecular biologic comparison of bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone grafts in augmentation of bone defect healing. J Biomed Mater Res 35(1):9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Välimäki VV, Aro HT (2006) Molecular basis for action of bioactive glasses as bone graft substitute. Scand J Surg 95(2):95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P Venesmaa, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland, M Nyyssönen, North Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland, M Kirjavainen Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, and E Gullichsen, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland for their contributions of cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Lindfors .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindfors, N. et al. (2016). Antibacterial Bioactive Glass, S53P4, for Chronic Bone Infections – A Multinational Study. In: Drago, L. (eds) A Modern Approach to Biofilm-Related Orthopaedic Implant Infections. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 971. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_156

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics