Respiratory Virology and Immunogenicity pp 41-46 | Cite as
Vaccination Status and Perception of Influenza Vaccination in the Polish Population
- 2 Citations
- 1.3k Downloads
Abstract
Influenza is still considered to be the most dangerous infectious disease of the twenty-first century. Outbreaks of influenza occur worldwide and affect all ages. The disease is severe, often with threatening complications and can lead to death, albeit many people have it in disregard. One of the main ways of preventing the disease is vaccination. The most effective method of prevention against influenza illness and its complications are annual vaccinations. Vaccinations, although recommended by the Ministry of Health in Poland, are not subject to refund. This paper presents the results of research conducted with the use of an anonymous questionnaire containing 18 questions to be completed by parents of school children, students of technical and medical universities, patients, medical staff, and people over 65 years of age. The study was conducted in the season of 2012/2013 in Poland. The survey involved 1,203 people in various age groups with different educational background. The analysis of the study shows that respondents very rarely use this form of prevention. Even if the vaccination were refunded, the percentage of people vaccinated against influenza would not increase significantly. Among the respondents, those who are in favor of influenza vaccination are in the minority.
Keywords
Influenza virus types A and B Influenza like virus Epidemiological surveillanceNotes
Conflicts of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interests in relation to this article.
References
- Brydak LB (1998) Flu and its prevention. Springer PWN, Warsaw, pp 1–216 (in Polish)Google Scholar
- Brydak LB (2001) Efficacy and safety of vaccination against influenza in children. Pediatr Pol 9:631–638 (Article in Polish)Google Scholar
- CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) Delayed supply of influenza vaccine and adjunct CDC influenza vaccine recommendations for the 2000–01 influenza season. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:619–622Google Scholar
- Douglas RG (1976) Influenza: the disease and its complications. Hosp Pract 11:43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glathe H, Langer W (1995) Influenza vaccination in older patients. Immunogenicity, epidemiology and available agents. Drug Ther 6:368–387Google Scholar
- Kark JD, Lebiush M (1981) Smoking and epidemic influenza-like illness in female military recruits: a brief survey. Am J Public Health 71:530–532PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kark JD, Lebiush M, Rannon L (1982) Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for epidemic A/H1N1/influenza in young men. N Engl J Med 307:1042–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kruszewski K, Brydak LB (2000) The epidemiology and history of influenza. Biomed Pharmacother 54:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lew E (1996) French economic evaluations of influenza and influenza vaccination. Pharmacoeconomics 9:62–66 (Article in Polish)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nichol KL, Kom JE, Margolis KL, Poland GA, Petrel R (1990) Achieving the national heath objective for influenza immunization: success of an institution – wide vaccination program. Am J Med 89:156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nitsch-Osuch A, Wozniak-Kosek A, Brydak LB (2012) Seasonal influenza in children – the underestimated problem. Med Overv 69:1029–1214Google Scholar
- Palache AM (1992) Influenza subunit vaccine – ten years experience. Eur J Clin Res 3:117–138Google Scholar
- Powers DC (1992) Immunological principles and emerging strategies of vaccination for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:81–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powers DC, Hayden FG, Samuelson I, Gwaltney JM Jr (1984) Immune response of adults to sequential influenza vaccination. J Med Virol 14:169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar