Skip to main content

Reporting standards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Topics in Current Genetics ((TCG,volume 18))

Abstract

Metabolomic studies generate large quantities of data. Metabolomics data sets have complexstructure and will typically be subjected to a variety of processing and analysis techniques.The data sets are expensive to collect and can be expected to hold more useful information than isextracted and used by the studies, which collected them. These aspects of metabolomics have causedworkers to consider, from the very early days of the field, what constitutes comprehensive and wellstructured metabolomics data, how it should be collected, how it should be transmitted and how, andwhere it should be stored. It has been generally assumed that the availability of well-curated datasets in standardised formats will pay large dividends for the science. This chapter considers thenature of reporting standards, the benefits that they can yield, existing data standardisation initiativesin metabolomics and related fields and discusses some issue surrounding their development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett T, Suzek TO, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ngau W-C, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Lash AE, Fujibuchi W, Edgar R (2005) NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles – database and tools. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D562–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bino RJ, Hall RD, Fiehn O, Kopka J, Saito K, Draper J, Nikolau BJ, Mendes P, Roessner-Tunali U, Beale MH, Trethewey RN, Lange BM, Wurtele ES, Sumner LW (2004) Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Sci 9:418–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (2005) The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, 2 edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FCP, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M (2001) Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) – toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 29:365–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brazma A, Parkinson H, Sarkans U, Shojatalab M, Vilo J, Abeygunawardena N, Holloway E, Kapushesky M, Kemmeren P, Lara GG, Oezcimen A, Rocca-Serra P, Sansone SA (2003) ArrayExpress - a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 31:68–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruskiewich R, Coe EH, Jaiswal P, McCouch S, Polacco M, Stein L, Vincent L, Ware D (2002) The plant ontology (TM) consortium and plant ontologies. Comp Funct Genomics 3:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castle AL, Fiehn O, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Lindon JC (2006) Metabolomics standards workshop and the development of international standards for reporting metabolomics experimental results. Brief Bioinform 7:159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiehn O (2001) Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks. Comp Funct Genomics 2:155–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiehn O, Kloska S, Altmann T (2001) Integrated studies on plant biology using multiparallel techniques. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:82–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiehn O, Kristal B, Ommen BV, Sumner LW, Sansone S-A, Taylor C, Hardy N, Kaddurah-Daouk R (2006) Establishing reporting standards for metabolomic and metabonomic studies: A call for participation. OMICS 10:158–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Freemantle M (2002) Unique labels for compounds. Chem Eng News 80:33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB, Harrigan GG, Kell DB (2004) Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol 22:245–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin JL (2006) The Cinderella story of metabolic profiling: does metabolomics get to go to the functional genomics ball? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:147–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanash S, Celis JE (2002) The human proteome organization a – mission to advance proteome knowledge. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:413–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy N, Fuell H (2003) Databases, data modelling and schemas: database development in metabolomics. In: Harrigan GG, Goodacre R (eds) Metabolic profiling: its role in biomarker discovery and gene function analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Bader G, Wojcik R, Salwinski L, Ceol A, Moore S, Orchard S, Sarkans U, von Mering C, Roechert B, Poux S, Jung E, Mersch H, Kersey P, Lappe M, Li YX, Zeng R, Rana D, Nikolski M, Husi H, Brun C, Shanker K, Grant SGN, Sander C, Bork P, Zhu WM, Pandey A, Brazma A, Jacq B, Vidal M, Sherman D, Legrain P, Cesareni G, Xenarios L, Eisenberg D, Steipe B, Hogue C, Apweiler R (2004) The HUPOPSI's Molecular Interaction format – a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat Biotechnol 22:177–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffer JA, George JF, Valacich JS (2002) Modern systems analysis and design, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey,

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins H, Beckmann M, Draper J, Hardy N (2007) GC-MS peak labeling under ArMet. In: Nikolau BJ, Wurtele ES (eds) Concepts in plant metabolomics. Springer, p 297

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins H, Hardy N, Beckmann M, Draper J, Smith AR, Taylor J, Fiehn O, Goodacre R, Bino RJ, Hall R, Kopka J, Lane GA, Lange BM, Liu JR, Mendes P, Nikolau BJ, Oliver SG, Paton NW, Rhee S, Roessner-Tunali U, Saito K, Smedsgaard J, Sumner LW, Wang T, Walsh S, Wurtele ES, Kell DB (2004) A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results. Nat Biotechnol 22:1601–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkins H, Johnson H, Kular B, Wang T, Hardy N (2005) Toward supportive data collection tools for plant metabolomics. Plant Physiol 138:67–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones AR, Pizarro A, Spellman P, Miller M (2006) FuGE: functional genomics experiment object model. OMICS 10:179–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindon JC (ed) (2005) Standardisation of reporting methods for metabolic analyses: a draft policy document from the standard metabolic reporting structures (SMRS) group. http://www.smrsgroup.org/documents/SMRS_policy_draft_v2.3.pdf

  23. Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Keun HC, Craig A, Pearce JTM, Bruce SJ, Hardy N, Sansone SA, Antti H, Jonsson P, Daykin C, Navarange M, Beger RD, Verheij ER, Amberg A, Baunsgaard D, Cantor GH, Lehman-McKeeman L, Earll M, Wold S, Johansson E, Haselden JN, Kramer K, Thomas C, Lindberg J, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Wilson ID, Reily MD, Robertson DG, Senn H, Krotzky A, Kochhar S, Powell J, van der Ouderaa F, Plumb R, Schaefer H, Spraul M (2005) Summary recommendations for standardization and reporting of metabolic analyses. Nat Biotechnol 23:833–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mattes WB, Pettit SD, Sansone SA, Bushel PR, Waters MD (2004) Database development in toxicogenomics: Issues and efforts. Environ Health Perspect 112:495–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendes P (2002) Emerging bioinformatics for the metabolome. Brief Bioinform 3:134–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison N, Cochrane G, Faruque N, Tatusova T, Tateno Y, Hancock D, Field D (2006a) Concept of sample in OMICS technology. OMICS 10:127–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrison N, Wood AJ, Hancock D, Shah S, Hakes L, Gray T, Tiwari B, Kille P, Cossins A, Hegarty M, Allen MJ, Wilson WH, Olive P, Last K, Kramer C, Bailhache T, Reeves J, Pallett D, Warne J, Nashar K, Parkinson H, Sansone S-A, Rocca-Serra P, Stevens R, Snape J, Brass A, Field D (2006b) Standard annotation of environmental OMICS data: application to the transcriptomics domain. OMICS 10:172–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. National Research Council (US) (2003) Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. National Academies Press, Washington, DC ( http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10613.html )

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E (1999) “Metabonomics”: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 29:1181–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Object management Group (2004) Life sciences identifiers, v1.0. In: Object management Group. Needham, MA, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oliver SG, Winson MK, Kell DB, Baganz F (1998) Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol 16:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Orchard S, Hermjakob H, Apweiler R (2003) The Proteomics Standards Initiative. Proteomics 3:1374–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedrioli PGA, Eng JK, Hubley R, Vogelzang M, Deutsch EW, Raught B, Pratt B, Nilsson E, Angeletti RH, Apweiler R, Cheung K, Costello CE, Hermjakob H, Huang S, Julian RK, Kapp E, McComb ME, Oliver SG, Omenn G, Paton NW, Simpson R, Smith R, Taylor CF, Zhu WM, Aebersold R (2004) A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research. Nat Biotechnol 22:1459–1466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rew R, Davis G, Emmerson S, Davies H (1997) NetCDF user's guide for C. In: Unidata Program Center. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rhee SY, Beavis W, Berardini TZ, Chen GH, Dixon D, Doyle A, Garcia-Hernandez M, Huala E, Lander G, Montoya M, Miller N, Mueller LA, Mundodi S, Reiser L, Tacklind J, Weems DC, Wu YH, Xu I, Yoo D, Yoon J, Zhang PF (2003) The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community. Nucleic Acids Res 31:224–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Roessner U, Wagner C, Kopka J, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L (2000) Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plant J 23:131–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sansone S-A, Rocca-Serra P, Tong W, Fostel J, Morrison N, Jones AR (2006) A strategy capitalizing on synergies: the Reporting Structure for Biological Investigation (RSBI) working group. OMICS 10:164–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Spraul M, Hofmann M, Ackermann R, Nicholls AW, Damment JP, Haselden JN, Shockcor JP, Nicholson JK, Lindon JC (1997) Flow injection proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with pattern recognition methods: Implications for rapid structural studies and high throughput biochemical screening. Anal Comm 34:339–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Taylor CF, Hermjakob H, Julian RK, Garavelli JS, Aebersold R, Apweiler R (2006) The work of the Human Proteome Organisation's Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO PSI). OMICS 10:145–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tweeddale H, Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T (1998) Effect of slow growth on metabolism of Escherichia coli, as revealed by global metabolite pool ("Metabolome") analysis. J Bacteriol 180:5109–5116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Weckwerth W (2003) Metabolomics in systems biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:669–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wheeler DL, Chappey C, Lash AE, Leipe DD, Madden TL, Schuler GD, Tatusova TA, Rapp BA (2000) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 28:10–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Whetzel PL, Brinkman RR, Causton HC, Fan L, Field D, Fostel J, Fragoso G, Gray T, Heiskanen M, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morrison N, Parkinson H, Rocca-Serra P, Sansone S-A, Schober D, Smith B, Stevens R, Stoeckert CJ, Taylor C, White J, Wood A (2006) Development of FuGO: an ontology for functional genomics investigations. OMICS 10:199–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zimmermann P, Schildknecht B, Craigon D, Garcia-Hernandez M, Gruissem W, May S, Mukherjee G, Parkinson H, Rhee S, Wagner U, Hennig L (2006) MIAME/Plant – adding value to plant microarrray experiments. Plant Methods 2:1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel Hardy .

Editor information

Jens Nielsen Michael C. Jewett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hardy, N., Jenkins, H. (2007). Reporting standards. In: Nielsen, J., Jewett, M.C. (eds) Metabolomics. Topics in Current Genetics, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/4735_2007_0242

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics