Importance of the Villus Microcirculation for Intestinal Absorption of Glucose

  • C. Charles Michel
  • John R. Pappenheimer
Conference paper
Part of the Keio University International Symposia for Life Sciences and Medicine book series (KEIO, volume 13)

Conclusions and Summary

When the best available estimates of the blood flow and the permeability-surface area product of the villus microcirculation are used in an analysis of glucose absorption in humans and rats, the concentrations of glucose predicted to be present at the basement membrane of the epithelium rise to values that exceed 100mM. If an increase in villus blood flow did not occur in proportion to the glucose absorption rate, glucose concentration in the tissue would rise to even higher levels. Our tentative estimates of glucose concentration within the epithelial cells suggest that without increases in blood flow and PS of the villus microcirculation the rising levels of intracellular glucose concentration would limit maximal rates of absorption. It would seem that in addition to events occurring in the epithelial cells, the absorption of glucose involves a co-ordinated microvascular response comparable to that occurring in skeletal muscle during exercise.

Key words

Villus microcirculation Intestinal absorption Glucose Permeability Epithelia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pappenheimer JR, Michel CC (2003) Role of the villus microcirculation in intestinal absorption of glucose: coupling of epithelial with endothelial transport. J Physiol 553:561–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ugolev AM (1987) Membrane transport and hydrolytic enzymes under physiological vs. acute experimental conditions. News Physiol Sci 2:186–190Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grudzkov AA (1993) Modern concepts of substance transfer across the pre-epithelial layer of the small intestine (in Russian). Sech J Physiol 79:19–32Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grudzkov AA, Gromova LV (1995) The coupling of disaccharide hydrolysis with absorption of released glucose in the small intestine in vivo (in Russian). Dokl Akad Nauk 342:830–832Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gromova LV, Grudzkov AA (1999) Hydrolysis-dependent absorption of disaccharides in the rat small intestine. Gen Physiol Biophys 18:209–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holdsworth CD, Dawson AM (1964) The absorption of monosaccharides in man. Clin Sci 27:371–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malawer SJ, Ewton M, Fordtran JS, et al (1965) Interrelationships between jejunal absorption of sodium, glucose and water in man. Am Soc Clin Invest 44:1072–1073Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray GM, Ingelfinger FJ (1965) Intestinal absorption of sucrose in man: the site of hydrolysis and absorption. J Clin Invest 44:390–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray GM, Ingelfinger FJ (1966) Intestinal absorption of sucrose in man: interrelation of hydrolysis and monosaccharide product absorption. J Clin Invest 45:388–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fordtran JS, Saltin B (1967) Gastric emptying and intestinal absorption during prolonged severe exercise. J Appl Physiol 23:331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sladen GE, Dawson AM (1969) Interrelationships between the absorption of glucose, sodium and water by the normal human jejunum. Clin Sci 36:119–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fordtran JS (1975) Stimulation of active and passive sodium absorption by sugars in the human jejunum. J Clin Invest 55:728–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gisolfi CV, Summers RW, Schedl HP, et al (1992) Intestinal water absorption from select carbohydrate solutions in humans. J Appl Physiol 73:2142–2150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fine KD, Santa Ana CA, Porter JL, et al (1993) Effect of D-glucose on intestinal permeability and its passive absorption in human small intestine in vivo. Gastroenterology 105:1117–1125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pappenheimer JR (1998) Scaling of dimensions of small intestines in non-ruminant eutherian mammals and its significance for absorptive mechanisms. Comp Biochem Physiol A 121:45–58Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shoemaker WC, Yanof HM, Turk IM III, et al (1963) Glucose and fructose absorption in the unanesthetized dog. Gastroenterology 44:654–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sidery MB, MacDonald IA (1994) The effect meal size on the cardiovascular responses to food ingestion. Br J Nutr 71:835–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallavan RH, Chou CC, Kvietys PR, et al (1980) Regional blood flow during digestion in the conscious dog. Am J Physiol 238:H220–H225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perry MA, Granger DN (1981) Permeability of intestinal capillaries to small molecules. Am J Physiol 241:G24–G30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lundgren O (1984) Microcirculation of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. In: Renkin EM, Michel CC (eds) Handbook of physiology, section 2, vol. IV. Part ii. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 799–863Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hallbäck DA, Jodal M, Mannischeff M, et al (1991) Tissue osmolality in intestinal villi of four mammals in vivo and in vitro. Acta Physiol Scand 143:271–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kellett JL (2001) The facilitated component of intestinal glucose absorption. J Physiol 531:585–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheeseman CI, Harley B (1991) Adaptation of glucose transport across rat enterocyte basolateral membranes in response to altered dietary carbohydrate intake. J Physiol 437:563–575PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Charles Michel
    • 1
  • John R. Pappenheimer
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of MedicineImperial CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations