Surgical Procedures and Clinical Results of Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

  • Munehito Yoshida
  • Akitaka Ueyoshi
  • Kazuhiro Maio
  • Masaki Kawai
  • Yukihiro Nakagawa


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical indication and clinical outcomes of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. From September 1998 to March 2002, 250 consecutive patients underwent posterior endoscopic surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Among these patients, 27 were treated by posterior endoscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis. There were 19 men and 8 women, and their average age was 60 ± 12.8 years. The major preoperative symptom was neurologic claudication, sometimes accompanied by sciatica. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for lumbar disease (maximum score, 29). Among the 27 patients, the average JOA score was 13.7 ± 3.8 preoperatively, which improved to 26.4 ± 2.8 postoperatively. The average operation time was 56 min for one level, and the average blood loss was 46ml for one level. There were no interoperative complications. The microendoscopic decompression technique is characterized by a small skin incision, less invasion of paraspinal muscle, and a small dead space. The ipisilateral approach and contralateral endoscopic decompression can be performed under the midline posterior structures the same as microsurgical decompression. This endoscopical decompression minimizes resection of the pathologic compression tissues and affords a safe procedure. The clinical outcome was excellent and patient satisfaction was good in most cases.

Key words

Lumbar canal stenosis Endoscopic surgery Microendoscopic discectomy Surgical procedure Clinical outcome 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, et al (2000) Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1754–1759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakai O, Ookawa A, Yamamura IF (1991) Long-term roentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg 73A:1184–1191Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Postacchini F (1999) Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:1043–1047PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aryanpur J, Ducker T (1990) Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 26:429–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See DH, Kraft GH (1975) Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 56:80–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarva L, et al (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE, et al (1994) Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I. Clinical correlations. J Neurosurg 81:699–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A (1989) Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 14:591–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Techniques Neurosurg 3:301–307Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoshida M, Katoh K, Sumiya H, et al (2001) Clinical evaluation of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of MED and Love (in Japanese). Clin Orthop Surg 36:497–502Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoshida M, Sumiya H, Iwasaki K, et al (2001) Initial clinical outcomes of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine Spinal Cord 14:381–388Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshida M, Shima K, Taniguchi Y, et al (1992) Hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Pathogenesis and morphologic and immunohistochemical observation. Spine 17:1353–1360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCulloch JA (1998) Microsurgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Essentials of spinal microsurgery. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp. 475–480Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower R, et al (1999) Microsurgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 24:2268–2272PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Munehito Yoshida
    • 1
  • Akitaka Ueyoshi
    • 1
  • Kazuhiro Maio
    • 1
  • Masaki Kawai
    • 1
  • Yukihiro Nakagawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryWakayama Medical UniversityWakayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations