Skip to main content

How do marketing-events work? Marketing-events and brand attitudes

  • Chapter
International Advertising and Communication

Abstract

In the past few years a large number of studies have been published examining the various practical and theoretical aspects of event-marketing and event-sponsorship. The academic research aims to explain the effectiveness of these marketing communication tools. Primarily the elements of recall and recognition have become central factors within this field of research (Walliser 2003). However, the effects of marketing-events on creating a positive attitude towards the involved brands have received little consideration so far. Accordingly, there are inconsistent theoretical approaches and only few empirical studies focussing primarily on this aspect of event-marketing. It is known that marketing-events can modify a certain attitude towards a brand, but it is not clarified why and how. Even though different models have been established to estimate the influence of marketing-events on attitude formation (cf. Baux 1991; Walliser 1993; Ganassali & Didellon 1996; Gwinner 1997; Hoek et al. 1997; Courbet 2000; Meenaghan 2001; Nufer 2002; Drengner 2004), not one of those has proven its superiority in empirical research so far (Walliser 2003). Instead of adding another model to explain the effects of event-marketing and event-sponsorship on attitude formation this paper aims at reviewing the broad approach in this field of research in order to educe a general understanding of the effectiveness of marketing-events. We assume that the attitude towards the brand (AB), as a main objective of event-marketing and -sponsorship, is essentially influenced by three determining factors: The attitude towards the event (AE), the attitude towards the communication activities presented at the event (AAD) and the prior attitude towards the brand that existed before visiting the event (A0 B). This paper outlines the literature reporting an empirical or conceptual investigation of the attitude formation in the context of marketing-events. Based on this state of research we generate our understanding of the impact of marketing-events on the attitude towards the brand. The results of an empirical study which examined the influence of A0 B, AAD and AE on AB will be reported. Based on our findings practical and empirical implications will be given. We conclude with suggestions for further testing of our model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, Icek (2001), “Nature and Operation of Attitudes,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein (2000), “Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes,” European Review of Social Psychology, ed. Wolfgang Stroebe and Miles Hewstone, Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanger, Roland & Gerd Wenninger (1999). “ Handwörterbuch Psychologie,” Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. (1998), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baux, Philippe (1991), “Modèles de persuasion et parrainage sportif,” Revue Française du Marketing, 131, 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Roger (1999), “Sports sponsorship, spectator recall and false consensus,” European Journal of Marketing, 33(3/4), 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven P. and Douglas M. Stayman (1992), “Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June), 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Robert, Wendy Frisby, and Ronald McCarville (1996), “Understanding the sport sponsorship process from a corporate perspective,” Journal of Sport Management, 10(1), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. Bettina and Isabelle Maigan (1998), “An international review of sponsorship research,” Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbet, Didier (2000), “Les effets automatiques du parrainage télévisuel sur la marque: étude de la mésattribution de la familiarité, du transfert sémantique et de l’influence des émotions déclenchées par le programme,” Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 15(1), 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm-Volk, Kristina (2002), “Sportsponsoring als Kommunikationsinstrument im Marketing,” Regensburg: Roderer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbaix, Christian, Philippe Gérard, and Thierry Lardinoit (1994), “Essai de conceptualisation d’une activité éminement pratique: Le parrainage,” Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 2, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drengner, Jan (2004), “Imagewirkung von Eventmarketing,” Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H. and Shelly Chaiken (1998), “Attitude structure and function,” The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, 2, Boston: McGraw-Hill, 269–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganassali, Stéphane and Laurence Didellon (1996), “Le transfert comme principe central du parrainage,” Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 11(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierl, Heribert and Andrea Kirchner (1999), “Emotionale Bindung und Imagetransfer durch Sport-sponsoring,” Transfer Werbeforschung & Praxis, 43(3), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohs, Reinhard, Udo Wagner, and Sabine Vstecka (2004). “Assessing the Effectiveness of Sport Sponsorships — An Empirical Examination,” Schmalenbachs Business Review, 56 (April), 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, Kevin (1997), “A Model of Image Creation and Image Transfer in Event Sponsorship,” International Marketing Review, 14(3), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, Kevin and Eaton, John (1999) “Building brand image through event sponsorship: The role image transfer”, Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, David R. (1970), “The Semantic Differential and Attitude Research,” Attitude Measurement, ed. Gene F. Summers, Chicago: Rand McNally, 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, Janet, Philip Gendall, Michelle Jeffcoat, and David Orsman (1997), “Sponsorship and Advertising: a comparison of their effects.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 3 (March), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagre, Emma, John J. Watson, and John G. Watson (2001), “Sponsorship and Congruity Theory: A Theoretical Framework for Explaining Consumer Attitude and Recall of Event Sponsorship,” Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasslop, Ingo (2003), “Effektivität und Effizienz von Marketingevents,” Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Richard J. (1985), “Affective and Cognitive Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad: A Conceptual Framework,” Psychological process and advertising effects: theory, research, and applications. ed. Linda F. Alwitt and Andrew A. Mitchell. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Scott B., Richard J. Lutz, and George E. Belch (1986), “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations” Journal of Marketing Reseacrh, 23 (May), 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal, Robert (2001), “Social Identity Effects in a Belief-Attitude-Intentions Hierarchy: Implications for Corporate Sponsorship.” Psychology & Marketing, 18 (February), 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, Gunnar, Kerstin Weihe, and Günter Silberer (2005), “Marketing Events and Attitude Formation: An Empirical Study about the Influence of Advertising Activities at Events and the Dynamic of Attitude Formation,” Marketing in an Inter-connected World: Opportunities and Challenges, ed. Carol W. DeMoranville, Proceedings of the 12th Biennial World Marketing Congress, Münster, Germany, 505–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, Tony (2001), “Understanding Sponsorship Effects,” Psychology & Marketing, 18 (February), 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, Tony (1983), “Commercial Sponsorship”, European Journal of Marketing, 19(7),. 5–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Abhilasha and Scott C. Purvis (1995), “When Attitudes Towards Advertising in General Influence Advertising Success,” Conference of The American Academy of Advertising, Norfolk, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Andrew A. and Jerry C. Olson (1996), “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?” Journal of Marketing Research, 10(4), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nufer, Gerd (2002), “Wirkung von Eventmarketing,” Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. (1978), “Psychometric theory,” New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, Charles E., Percy H. Tannenbaum, and George J. Suci. (1957), “The Measurement of Meaning,” Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1981), “Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches,” Dubuque, Iowa: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty Richard E. & Duane T. Wegener (1998), “Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages,” Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24, 227–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Donald, P. & Bettina T. Cornwell (2003). “Brand equity’s influence on responses to event sponsorship”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(6), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Dennis M. and David Shani. (1989) “Olympic Sponsorship vs. ‘Ambush’ Marketing: Who Gets the Gold?” Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (August/September), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence A. (1981), “Attitude Toward the Ad as A Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberer, Günter (1980), “Dissonanz bei Konsumenten,” in Grundbegriffe der Wirtschaftspsychologie, ed. Carl Graf Hoyos, Werner Kroeber-Riel, Lutz von Rosenstiel, and Burkhard Strümpel, München: Kösel, 344–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberer, Günter, Gunnar Mau, and Kerstin Weihe (2005), “Process Tracing of Visitor’s Attitudes During the Attendance of Marketing Events,” in Proceedings of the 10 th International Corporate and Marketing Communication Conference 2005, April 2005, Cyprus, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, Richard and Peter Thompson (2000) “Determinants of Sports Sponsorship Response” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, Björn (2003), “An International Review Of Sponsorship Research: Extension and Update,” International Journal of Advertising, 22(1), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, Björn (1993), “Modèle explicatif de l’influence du sponsoring sur le spectateur d’un événement sportif,” in Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the French Marketing Association (AFM), May, Marseille: Association Française de Marketing, 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanger, Cornelia and Sistenich, Frank (1996), “Eventmarketing: Bestandsaufnahme, Standortbestimmung und ausgewählte theoretsiche Ansätze zur Erklärung eines innovativen kommunikationsinstrumentes” Marketing ZFP, 18(4), 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sandra Diehl Ralf Terlutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag ∣ GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weihe, K., Mau, G., Silberer, G. (2006). How do marketing-events work? Marketing-events and brand attitudes. In: Diehl, S., Terlutter, R. (eds) International Advertising and Communication. DUV. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-8350-5702-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics