Skip to main content

Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei Eingriffen mit der Herz-Lungen-Maschine

  • Chapter
Empfehlungen zum Einsatz und zur Verwendung der Herz-Lungen-Maschine
  • 1035 Accesses

4.3 Zusammenfassung

Die perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei Operationen am offenen Herzen gehört zu den gesicherten Maßnahmen, vornehmlich postoperative Wundinfektionen zu vermeiden. Es ist nicht ihre Aufgabe, andere nosokomiale Infektionen, z. B. Pneumonien und Harnwegsinfektionen, zu verhüten. Das ausgewählte Antibiotikum wird parenteral innerhalb der ersten Stunde vor Operationsbeginn verabreicht und bis zu 24 h, maximal jedoch höchstens 72 h postoperativ angewendet. Zu den bewährten Wirkstoffen zählen die einander gleichwertigen Erst- und Zweitgenerationszephalosporine (Cefazolin und Cefuroxim). Alternativpräparate sind Clindamycin und Glykopeptidantibiotika (Vancomycin, Teicoplanin). Ihr Einsatz bleibt jedoch besonderen Situationen (z.B. Penizillin-/Zephalosporinallergie oder nachweisliche Kolonisation des Patienten mit einem multiresistenten Staphylococcus-aureus-Stamm) vorbehalten. Ein breiter Einsatz der Glykopeptidantibiotika verbietet sich auch weiterhin trotz einer deutlichen Zunahme von oxacillinresistenten Staphylococcus-aureus-Stämmen in zahlreichen chirurgischen Herzzentren wegen der begründeten Gefahr, gegen diese Wirkstoffklasse resistente Enterokokken und Staphylokokken zu selektionieren. Zudem haben sich weder Clindamycin noch Vancomycin bzw. Teicoplanin gegenüber den älteren Zephalosporinen in der perioperativen Antibiotikaprophylaxe als überlegen erwiesen. Sie verhindern nicht mehr postoperative Wundinfektionen als diese Zephalosporinantibiotika.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

4.4 Literatur

  1. Adam D, Daschner F (1993) Infektionsverhütung bei operativen Eingriffen. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akl B, Richardson G (1980) Serum cefazolin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 29:109–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymus (1994) Antibiotikaprophylaxe in der Chirurgie. Der Arzneimittel-brief 28:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASHP (1992) Commission on Therapeutics.: ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Clin Pharm 11:483–513

    Google Scholar 

  5. Austin T, Coles J, McKechnie P et al. (1977) Cephalothin prophylaxis and valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 23:333–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Austin T, Coles J, Burnett R et al. (1980) Aorta-coronary bypass procedures and sternotomy infections: a study of antistaphylococcal prophylaxis. Can J Surg 23:483–485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayliffe GAJ (1991) Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. RID 13(Suppl 10):S800–804

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bain W, McGeachie J, Lindsay G et al. (1977) The use of cephalothin sodium (keflin) as the prophylactic antibiotic for open heart surgery. JAC 3:339–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolon M, Morlote M et al. (2004) Glycopeptides are no more effective than β-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis. CID 38:1357–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bratzler D, Houck P (2004) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID 38:1706–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryan C, Smith C, Sutton J et al. (1961) Comparison of cefamandole and cefazolin during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86:222–225

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke J (1961) The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 50:161–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burke J (2003) Infection control — A problem for patient safety. NEJM 348:651–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang S, Sievert D et al. (2003) Infection with vancomycin-resistant staphylococcus aureus containing the van A resistance gene. NEJM 348:1342–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Classen D, Evans R, Pestotnik S et al. (1992) The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical wound infection. NEJM 326:281–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Conklin C, Gray R, Neilson D et al. (1988) Determinants of wound infection incidence after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in patients randomized to receive prophylactic cefuroxime or cefazolin. Ann Thorac Surg 46:172–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Conte J, Cohen S, Roe B et al. (1972) Antibiotic prophylaxis and cardiac surgery: a prospective double-blind comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose regimens. Ann Intern Med 76:943–949

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cruse P, Foord R (1980) The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62939 wounds. Surg Clin N Amer 60:27–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Daschner F (1981) Antibiotikaprophylaxe — sinnvoll oder sinnlos? DMW 106:1150–1153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dellinger E, Gross P, Barrett T et al. (1994) Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. CID 18:422–427

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dodds Ashley E, Carroll D et al. (2004) Risk factors for postoperative mediastinitis due to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. CID 38:1555–1560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Doebbling B, Pfaller M, Kuhns K et al. (1990) Cardiovascular surgery prophylaxis: a randomized, controlled comparison of cefazolin and cefuroxime. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99:981–989

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farrar W, Grambling P (1976) Antistaphylococcal activity and beta-lactamase resistance of newer cephalosporins. JID 133:691–695

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fekety F, Cluff L, Sabiston D et al. (1969) A study of antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:757–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Finkelstein R, Rabino G et al. (2002) Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:326–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Firor W (1967) Infection following open-heart surgery, with special reference to the role of prophylactic antibiotics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:371–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fong I, Baker C, McKee D (1979) The value of prophylactic antibiotics in aorta-coronary bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78:908–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gentry L, Zeluff B, Cooley D (1988) Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery: A compersion of cefmandole, cefuroxime, and cefazolin. Ann Thorac Surg 46:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Geroulanos S, Oxelbark S, Donfried B et al. (1987) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery. Thorac cardiovasc Surgeon 35:199–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldmann D, Hopkins C, Karchmer A et al. (1977) Cephalothin prophylaxis in cardiac valve surgery; a prospective, double-blind comparison of two-day and six-day regimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73:470–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goodman J, Schaffner W, Collins H et al. (1968) Infection after cardiovascular surgery. NEJM 278:117–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gorbach S (1989) The role of cephalosporins in surgical prophylaxis. JAC 23(Suppl D):61–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gross P, Barrett T, Dellinger E et al. (1994) Purpose of quality standards for infectious diseases. CID 18:421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayward G (1973) Infective endocarditis: a changing disease. British Medical Journal ii:706–709 and 764–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Herr R, Starr A, McCord C et al. (1965) Special problems following valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Herxheimer A (1977) Cephalothin prophylaxis in open-heart surgery, and other uncontrolled studies. JAC 3:621–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) (1995) Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 16:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hillis D, Rosenfeldt F, Spicer W et al. (1983) Antibiotic prophylaxis for coronary bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86:217–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson A (1998) Intermediate vancomycin resistance in staphylococcus au-reus: a major threat or a minor inconvenience? JAC 42:289–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Joyce FS, Szczepanski KP (1986) A double-blind comparative Study of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in open heart surgery: Penicillin G versus vancomycin. Thorac cardiovasc Surgeon 34:100–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaiser A, Petracek M, Lea IVJ et al. (1987) Efficacy of cefazolin, cefamandole, and gentamicin als prophylactic agents in cardiac surgery. Ann Surg 206:791–797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kini P, Fernandez J, Causay R et al. (1978) Double-blind comparison of cefazolin and cephalothin in open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 76:506–509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kittle C, Reed W (1961) Antibiotics and extracorporeal circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 41:34–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kreter B, Woods M (1992) Antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiothoracic operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104:590–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lord J, Imparato A, Hackel A et al. (1961) Endocarditis complicating open-heart surgery. Circulation 23:489–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mekontso-Dessap A, Kirsch M et al. (2001) Poststernotomy mediastinitis due to staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible cases. CID 32:877–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Meyerowitz P, Caswell K, Lindsay W et al. (1977) Antibiotic prophylaxis for open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73:625–629

    Google Scholar 

  48. Molitch M (1982) Management of medical problems in surgical patients. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, p 346

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nagachinta T, Stephens M, Reitz B et al. (1987) Risk factors for surgical-wound infection following cardiac surgery. JID 156:967–973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Neu H (1979) Prophylaxis — has it at last come of age? JAC 5:331–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nooyen S, Overbeek B, Brutel de la Rivière et al. (1994) Prospective randomized comparing of single-dose versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13:1033–1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Penketh A, Wansbrough-Jones M, Wright E et al. (1985) Antibiotic prophylaxis for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Lancet 1:1500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Peters G (1987) Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe in der Chirurgie. DMW 112:644–646

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Peterson L, Gerding D, Fasching C (1981) Effects of method of antibiotic administration on extravascular penetration: cross-over study of cefazolin given by intermittent injection or constant infusion. JAC 7:71–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Pien F, Michael N, Mamiya R et al. (1979) Comparative study of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgery — dindamycin versus cephalothin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 77:908–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rosin H (1986) Antibiotikaprophylaxe in der operativen Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe aus der Sicht des Mikrobiologen. Operative Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, S 168–175

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rüden H, Gastmeier P, Daschner F et al. (1997) Nosocomial and community-acquired infections in Germany. Summary of the results of the first national prevalence study (NIDEP). Infection 25:199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sabath L, Garner C, Wilcos C, Finland M (1975) Effect of inoculum and of beta-lactamase on the anti-staphylococcal activity of thirteen penicillins and cephalosporins. AAC 8:344–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Slama T, Sklar S, Misinski J et al. (1986) Randomized comparison of cefamandole, cefazolin and cefuroxime prophylaxis in open-heart surgery. AAC 29:744–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Slonim R, Litwak R, Gadboys H et al. (1963) Antibiotic prophylaxis of infection complicating open-heart operations. AAC 3:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  61. Soteriou M, Recker F, Geroulanos S et al. (1989) Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery: A prospective randomized comparative trial of cefazolin versus ceftriaxone. World J Surg 13:798–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson A, Treasure T, Gruneberg R et al. (1988) Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: a prospective comparison of two dosage regimens of teicopla-nin with a combination of flucloxacillin and tobramycin. JAC 21:213–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wyatt T, Ferguson W, Wilson T et al. (1977) Gentamicin resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with the use of topical gentamicin. JAC 3:213–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, L. (2006). Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe bei Eingriffen mit der Herz-Lungen-Maschine. In: Feindt, P., Harig, F., Weyand, M. (eds) Empfehlungen zum Einsatz und zur Verwendung der Herz-Lungen-Maschine. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7985-1646-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7985-1646-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1504-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1646-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics