Skip to main content

Generous allocation and a ban on banking — implications of a simulation game for EU emissions trading

  • Chapter
  • 771 Accesses

Abstract

Admitting banking in emissions trading systems reduces overall compliance costs by allowing for intertemporal flexibility: cost savings can be traded over time. However most, EU Member States prohibit the transfer of unused allowances from the period of 2005–2007 into the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, i.e. 2008–2012. At the same time, allowances appear to be allocated fairly generously to the emissions trading sector. In this paper, we first explore the implications of such a ban on banking when initial emission targets are lenient. This analysis is based on a simulation which was recently carried out in Germany with companies and with a student control group. The findings suggest that an EU-wide ban on banking would lead to efficiency losses in addition to those losses which arise from the lack of intertemporal flexibility.

This paper is a shorter and slightly modified version of Schleich et al. (2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baron R (2000) Emission trading: a real time simulation. International Energy Agency Information Paper for COP6, Paris. http://www.iea.org/envissu/cop6/emistr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron R (2002) Trading CO2 and electricity in the Baltic Sea region. Report on the simulation of the Baltic Sea Region Energy Cooperation BASREC, IEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz R, Eichhammer W, Schleich J (2004) Designing national allocation plans for EU emissions trading-a first analysis of the outcomes. Energy & Environment 15: 375–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boemare C, Quirion P (2002) Implementing greenhouse gas trading in Europe: lessons from economic theory and international experiences. Ecological Economics 43: 213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson C, Burtraw D, Cropper M, Palmer KL (2000) Sulphur dioxide control by electric utilities: what are the gains from trade? Journal of Political Economy 108: 1292–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament-on EU Policies and Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP). COM (2000) 88 Final. Brussels, 8 March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2001) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading within the European Community and Amending Council Decision 96/61/EC. COM (2001) 581 Final. Brussels, 21 October 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2003) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, OJ L275, 25.10.2003. Brussels, pp. 32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel C, Lutz N (2003) Introduction: what role can experiments play in research on regulation? Journal of Regulatory Economics 23: 103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart KM, Hoppe C, Schleich J, Seifert S (2003) Strategic aspects of CO2 emissions trading: theoretical concepts and empirical findings. Energy & Environment 14: 579–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart KM, Hoppe C, Schleich J, Seifert S (2004) EU Emissions Trading: Design Parameters and Efficiency. Working Paper, University of Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, and Takon GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman AD, Harrison D, Joskow PL (2003) Emissions trading: experience, lessons, and considerations for greenhouse gases. Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman AD, Schmalensee R, Joskow PL, Montero JP, Baily E (2000) Markets for Clean Air: the U.S. Acid Rain Program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman AD (2002) U.S. Experience with emissions trading: lessons for CO2 emissions trading. Paper presented at the 10th Symposium of the Egon-Sohmen-Foundation on Climate Policy: US and European Views, Dresden, 25–26 October 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman AD, Montero JP (2002) The temporal efficiency of SO2 emissions trading. MIT-Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Working Paper 2002-003 Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurelectric, IEA, and ParisBourse (1999) Greenhouse gas and electricity trading simulation 2. Reference 1999-420-0013, http://www.iea.org/clim/cop5/pubs/report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling C, Rubin J (1997) Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. Journal of Public Economics 64: 101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G (1999) Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal 109: 25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RA (1999) Experimental methods for research into trading of greenhouse gas emissions. Working Paper, Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller RA, Mestelmann S (1998) What have we learned from emissions trading experiments? Managerial and Decision Economics 19: 225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott CA (1982) Industrial organization theory and experimental economics. Journal of Economic Literature 20: 1485–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott CA (1989) An updated review of industrial organization: applications of experimental methods, In: Schmalensee R., Willig, RD. (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1109–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Betz R, Wartmann S, Ehrhart KM, Hoppe C, Seifert S (2002) Simulation eines Emissionshandels für Treibhausgase in der baden-württembergischen Unternehmenspraxis (SET UP), Endbericht an das Ministerium für Umwelt und Verkehr Baden-Württemberg, Karlsruhe. http://www.isi.fhg.de/u/planspiel/endber.pdf. Summary available in english under http://www.isi.fhg.de/u/e-projekte/e-bawueplan.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Ehrhart KM, Hoppe C, Seifert S (2006) Banning Banking in EU emissions trading, Energy Policy 34: 112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm B, Weimann J (2001) Experimente in der Umweltökonomik. FEMM Working Paper No. 7/2001, November 2001, University of Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg T (1999) Tradable permit approaches to pollution control: faustian bargain or paradise regained? In: Kaplowitz MD, Property Rights, Economics, and the Environment, JAI Press Inc., Stamford, pp. 175–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schleich, J., Ehrhart, KM., Hoppe, C., Seifert, S. (2006). Generous allocation and a ban on banking — implications of a simulation game for EU emissions trading. In: Antes, R., Hansjürgens, B., Letmathe, P. (eds) Emissions Trading and Business. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1748-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics