This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blanchard, O., P. Criqui, A. Kitous, and L. Viguier (2003), Combining Efficiency with Equity: A Pragmatic Approach, in: Kaul, I., P. Conceicao, K. Le Goulven, and R. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing Global Public Goods: Making Globalization Work for All, New York.
Blanchard, O., P. Criqui, M. Trommetter, and L. Viguier (2001), Equity and Efficiency in Climate Change Negotiations: A Scenario for World Emission Entitlements by 2030, IEPE, Cahier de Recherche no 26, http://www.upmf-grenoble.fr/iepe/Publications/cahiers.html.
Böhringer, C. (2002), Climate Politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing?, The Energy Journal 23(2), 51–71.
Böhringer, C. and A. Löschel (2002), Assessing the Costs of Compliance: The Kyoto Protocol, European Environment, 12(1), 1–16.
Böhringer, C. and A. Löschel (2002), Economic Impacts of Carbon Abatement Strategies, in: C. Böhringer, M. Finus, and C. Vogt, Controlling Global Warming, Cheltenham, 105–179.
Böhringer, C. and T.F. Rutherford (2002), Carbon Abatement and International Spillovers, Environmental and Resource Economics 22(3), 391–417.
Böhringer, C. (2002), Sustainable Impact Analysis: The Use of Computable General Equilibrium Models in Methodological Tools for SIA, Report of the CEPII Workshop held on 7–8 November 2002 in Brussels, No. 2003-19.
Böhringer, C. (2001), Climate Politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing?!?, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 01-49, Mannheim, http://www.zew.de/de/publikationen/neuepublikationen.php3?action=article_show&id=0000000813.
Böhringer, C. et al. (2000), European Emission Mitigation Policy and Technological Evolution: Economic Evaluation with the GEM-E3-EG Model (GEM-E3-ELITE), Final Report to the EC, Contract No. JOS3-CT97-0017.
Boulanger, P.M. and T. Brechet (2002), Setting Concepts into Motion. Improving Scientific Tools in Support of Sustainable Development Decision-Making, http://www.belspo.be/belspo/home/publ/pub_ostc/AS/dddobo_en.pdf.
Capros, P., N. Kouvaritakis and L. Mantzos (2001), Top-Down Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Possibilities in the EU, Final Report to EC-DG ENV.
Capros, P. (2000), Technology Evolution and Energy Modelling, special issue of the International Journal of Global Energy Issues (IJGEI) 14, 1–4.
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, D. Petrellis, V. Panos, K. Delkis, J-F. Guilmot, and E.L. Vouyoukas (1999), European Union Energy Outlook to 2020, special issue of Energy in Europe, European Commission Directorate General for Energy.
Capros, P., P. Georgakopoulos, D. Van Regemorter, S. Proost, T. Schmidt, H. Koschel, K. Conrad, and E.L. Vouyoukas (1999), Climate Technology Strategies 2 — The Macro-Economic Cost and Benefit of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union, ZEW Economic Studies Vol. 4, Heidelberg.
Capros, P., P. Georgakopoulos, D. van Regemorter, and D. Willenbockel (1998), Aggregate Results of the Single Market Programme, in: General Equilibrium Macro-Economic Ex-Post Evaluation of the EU Single Market Programme, Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Criqui, P. and N. Kouvaritakis (2000), World Energy Projections to 2030, International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14, 116–136.
Criqui, P., N. Kouvaritakis, and C. Thonet (2000), World Post-Kyoto Scenarios: Benefits from Accelerated Technology Progress, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 14, 184–203.
Criqui, P., S. Mima, and L. Viguier (1999), Marginal Abatement Costs of C02 Emission Reductions, Geographical Flexibility and Concrete Ceilings: An Assessment Using the POLES Model, Energy Policy, 27(10), 585–602.
Eckerinann, F., A. Hunt, T. Taylor, and M. Stronzik (2003), The Role of Transaction Costs and Risk Premia in the Determination of Climate Change Policy Responses, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-59, Mannheim, ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0359.pdf.
European Commission (2002), Communication on Impact Assessment, COM(2002)276 final.
European Commission (1996), POLES 2.2, DG XII, EUR 17358, Brussels.
European Commission (1995/1999), EXTERNE: Externalities of Energy, volumes 1-10, Brussels.
European Commission (1995), Computable General Equilibrium Model for Studying Economy-Energy-Environment Interactions GEM-E3, DG XII, EUR 16714, Brussels.
European Commission (1995), PRIMES, DG XII, EUR 16713, Brussels.
Friedrich, R. and P. Bickel (Eds.) (2001), Environmental External Costs of Transport, Heidelberg.
HM Treasury (1997), The Green Book. Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London.
Löschel, A. and M. Mraz (2002), EU Enlargement and Environmental Policy, in: p Böhringer, C. and A. Loschel (Eds.), Empirical Modeling of the Economy and the Environment, ZEW Economic Studies Vol. 20, Heidelberg
Navrud S. (2000), Strengths, Weaknesses and Policy Utility of Valuation Techniques and Benefit Transfer Methods, Invited paper for the OECD-USDA workshop “The Value of Rural Amenities: Dealing with Public Goods, Non-Market Goods and Externalities”, Washington D.C., June 5–6.
Navrud, S. and O. Bergland (2000) Value Transfer and Environmental Policy, Policy Research Brief Series 8, Cambridge Research for the Environment, http://www.mluri.sari.ac.uk/serp/research/eve/publ.html#PRB).
Navrud, S. and G.J. Pruckner (1997), Environmental Valuation — To Use or Not to Use? A Comparative Study of the United States and Europe, Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 1–26.
OECD (1997), Regulatory Impact Analysis — Best Practices in OECD Countries, Paris.
Rotmans, J. (1998), Methods for IA: The Challenges and Opportunities ahead, in: Rotmans, J. and P. Vellinga (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated Environmental Assessment, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Bussum, The Netherlands.
Rotmans, J. and H. Dowlatabadi (1998), Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: Evaluation of Methods and Strategies, in: Reyner, S. and E. Malone (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate change: An International Social Sciences Assessment, Washington.
Rotmans, J. and P. Vellinga (Eds.) (1998), Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated Environmental Assessment, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Bussum, The Netherlands.
Spash, C. (2000), The Concerted Action on Environmental Valuation in Europe (EVE): an Introduction, Policy Research Brief Series 1, Cambridge Research for the Environment, Cambridge, United Kingdom (http://www.mluri.sari.ac.uk/serp/research/eve/publ.html#PRB).
Stirling, A. (Ed.) (1999), On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risks, A ESTO Project Report — IPTS, EUR 19056 EN, Luxembourg.
Tamborra M. (2003), Developing Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment: The Role of Socioeconomic Research in the EU, paper presented at the conference “New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice”, 24–25 November 2003, http://www.enterprise-impact.org.uk/conference/Abstracts/Tamborra. shtml.
Tamborra, M. (2002), Socio-Economic Tools for Sustainability Impact Assessment, the Contribution of EU Research to Sustainable Development, European Commission, EUR 20437.
Viscusi, W.K. (1997), Improving the Analytical Basis for Regulatory Decision-Making, in: OECD, Regulatory Impact Analysis. Best Practices in OECD Countries, Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tamborra, M. (2005). Impact Assessment and Sustainability. In: Böhringer, C., Lange, A. (eds) Applied Research in Environmental Economics. ZEW Economic Studies, vol 31. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1645-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1645-0_5
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1587-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1645-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)