Skip to main content

Weak Systems of Gandy, Jensen and Devlin

  • Chapter
Book cover Set Theory

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

Abstract

In Part I, we formulate and examine some systems that have arisen in the study of the constructible hierarchy; we find numerous transitive models for them, among which are supertransitive models containing all ordinals that show that Devlin’s system BS lies strictly between Gandy’s systems PZ and BST’; and we use our models to show that BS fails to handle even the simplest rudimentary functions, and is thus inadequate for the use intended for it in Devlin’s treatise. In Part II we propose and study an enhancement of the underlying logic of these systems, build further models to show where the previous hierarchy of systems is preserved by our enhancement; and consider three systems that might serve Devlin’s purposes: one the enhancement of a version of BS, one a formulation of Gandy-Jensen set theory, and the third a subsystem common to those two. In Part III we give new proofs of results of Boffa by constructing three models in which, respectively, TCo, AxPair and AxSing fail; we give some sufficient conditions for a set not to belong to the rudimentary closure of another set, and thus answer a question of McAloon; and we comment on Gandy’s numerals and correct and sharpen other of his observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maurice Boffa, Axiome et schéma de fondement dans le système de Zermelo, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Math. Astron. Phys. 17 1969 113–5. MR 40 # 38.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Maurice Boffa, Axiom and scheme of foundation, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. 22 (1970) 242–247; MR 45 #6618.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Maurice Boffa, L’axiome de la paire dans le système de Zermelo, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung 15 (1972) 97–98. MR 47 #6486

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ch. Delhommé, Automaticité des ordinaux et des graphes homogènes (Automaticity of ordinals and of homogeneous graphs) C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 339 pp. 5–10 (2004). (French with abridged English version)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Devlin, Constructibility, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A.J. Dodd, The Core Model, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 61, Cambridge University Press, 1982. MR 84a:03062.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.E. Doner, A. Mostowski and A. Tarski, The elementary theory of well-ordering: a metamathematical study, in Logic Colloquium’ 77, eds. A. Macintyre, L. Pacholski, J. Paris, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1978, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.O. Gandy, Set-theoretic functions for elementary syntax, in Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 13, Part II, ed. T. Jech, American Mathematical Society, 1974, 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.B. Jensen, Stufen der konstruktiblen Hierarchie. Habilitationsschrift, Bonn, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.B. Jensen, The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, with a section by Jack Silver, Annals of Mathematical Logic, 4 (1972) 229–308; erratum ibid 4 (1972) 443.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacqueline Lelong-Ferrand and Jean-Marie Arnaudiès, Cours de mathématiques, Tome 1, Algèbre, Editions Dunod, Paris; first edition 1971; often reprinted.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.R.D. Mathias, Slim models of Zermelo Set Theory, Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2001) 487–496; MR 2003a:03076.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A.R.D. Mathias, The Strength of Mac Lane Set Theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 110 (2001) 107–234; MR 2002g:03105.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A.R.D. Mathias, A note on the schemes of replacement and collection, to appear in the Archive for Mathematical Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.R.D. Mathias, Rudimentary recursion, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.R.D. Mathias, Rudimentary forcing, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.R.D. Mathias, The banning of formal logic from a French national examination, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.M. Smullyan, Theory of formal systems, Ann. of Math. Studies, no, 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J., 1940. MR 2, 66.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Johann Sonner, On sets with two elements, Arch. Math (Basel) 20 (1969) 225–7. MR 40 #36.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee Stanley, review of [Dev], Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1987) 864–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrzej M. Zarach, Replacement ↛ Collection, in Gödel’ 96, ed. Petr Hájek, (Springer Lecture Notes in Logic, Volume 6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mathias, A.R.D. (2006). Weak Systems of Gandy, Jensen and Devlin. In: Bagaria, J., Todorcevic, S. (eds) Set Theory. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7692-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics