Tolerance of some potential forage grasses from arid regions of Pakistan to salinity and drought

  • Muhammad Ashraf

Abstract

Pakistan falls into arid and semi-arid regions, as about an area of 562,592 km2 out of 803,935 km2 of the total area of Pakistan is the arid land with an annual rainfall of less than 60 cm. Of the total salinized land, 56,656 km2 are saline, 29,138 km2 are saline sodic and 283 km2 sodic soil [1]. A large part of available agricultural land remains non-irrigated due to shortage of water. The unavailability of water and low rainfall are the major factors for converting large areas into deserts.

Keywords

Salt Tolerance Relative Water Content Proline Content Salt Treatment Osmotic Adjustment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Malik KA, Aslam Z, Naqvi M (1986) Kallar grass — A plant for saline land. The Neuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashraf M, McNeilly T, Bradshaw AD (1987) Selection and heritability of salt tolerance in four forage species. Crop Sci 227: 232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shannon MC (1985) Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant Soil 89: 227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashraf M (2004). Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora 199: 361–376Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bates LS, Waldren RP, Tear, ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witham FH, Blaydes DF, Devlin RM (1971) Experiments in plant physiology. Van Nostrand-Reinhold Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silva-Fernandes MS, Baker EA, Martin TJ (1964) Studies on plant cuticle. VI. The isolation and fractionation of cuticular waxes. Ann Appl Biol 53: 43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowry OH, Rosembrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193(1): 267–275Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas H (1987) Physiological responses to drought of Lolium perenne L. Measurement of, and genetic variation in, water potential, solute potential, elasticity and cell hydration. J Exp Bot 38: 115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashraf M, Bokhari MH (1987) Biological approach for economic utilization of the Cholistan desert. Biologia 33: 27–34Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 24: 519–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quisenberry JE (1982) Breeding for drought resistance and plant water use efficiency. In: MN Christiansen, CF Lewis (eds.): Breeding Crops for Less Favourable Environments, John Willey and Sons, New York 193–212Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blum A (1989) Osmotic adjustment and growth of barley genotypes under drought stress. Crop Sci 29: 230–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tyree MT, Jarvis PG (1982) Water in tissues and cells. In: OL Lange, PS Nobel, CB Osmond, H Zeiyler (eds.): Physiological Plant Ecology. II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 12B, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 35–37Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baker DA (1984) Water relations. In: MB Wilkins (ed.): Advanced Plant Physiology. The Pitman Press, Bath 297–318Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dainty J (1976) Water relations of plant cells. In: U Lutlge, MG Pitman (eds.): Transport in Plants II, Part A, Cells: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 12–35Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strogonov BP, Kabanov VV, Shevajakova NJ, Lapine LP, Kamizerko EI, Popove BA, Dostonova RK, Povykod KOLS (1970) Structure and Function of Plant Cell in Saline Habit. Nauka Moscow (Trans. Eng.). John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bartels D, Nelson D (1994) Approaches to improve stress tolerance using molecular genetics. Plant Cell Environ 17: 659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanson AD, Rathinasabapathi B, Rivoal J, Burnet M, Dillon MO, Gage DA (1994) Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 306–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rudulier DL, Storm AR, Dandekar AM, Smith LT, Valentine RC (1984) Molecular biology of osmoregulation. Science 224: 1064–1068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG (1995) Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ganogopadhyay G, Basu S (2000) Proline as osmotic stress marker in in vitro system. In: A Hemantaranjan (ed.): Plant Physiology, Biochemistry and Plant Molecular Biology in 2000. Vol. 3. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur-India 283–304Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jordan WR, Shouse PJ, Blum A, Miller FR, Monk PK (1984) Environmental Physiology of Sorghum. II. Epicuticular wax load and cuticular transpiration. Crop Sci 24: 1168–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashraf M, Mehmood S (1990) Responses of four Brassica species to drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 30: 93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wyn Jones RG, Gorham J, McDonnell E (1984) Organic and nonorganic solute contents as selection criteria for salt tolerance in the Triticeae. In: RC Staples, GH Toenniessen (eds.): Salinity tolerance in plants-Strategies for crop improvement, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 189–203Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR (1977) The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28: 89–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greenway H, Munns RA (1980) Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 31: 149–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muhammad S, Akbar M, Neue HU (1987) Effect of Na/Ca and Na/K ratios in saline culture solution on the growth and mineral nutrition of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 104: 57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qain YL, Wilhelm SJ, Marcum KB (2001) Comparative responses of two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars to salinity stress. Crop Sci 41: 1895–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Netondo GW, Onyango JC, Beck E (2004) Sorghum and salinity. II. Gas exchange and chlorophyll florescence of sorghum under salt stress. Crop Sci 44: 806–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Ashraf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations