Automatic Segmentation of Speech at the Phonetic Level

  • Jon Ander Gómez
  • María José Castro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2396)

Abstract

A complete automatic speech segmentation technique has been studied in order to eliminate the need for manually segmented sentences. The goal is to fix the phoneme boundaries using only the speech waveform and the phonetic sequence of the sentences.

The phonetic boundaries are established using a Dynamic Time Warping algorithm that uses the a posteriori probabilities of each phonetic unit given the acoustic frame. These a posteriori probabilities are calculated by combining the probabilities of acoustic classes which are obtained from a clustering procedure on the feature space and the conditional probabilities of each acoustic class with respect to each phonetic unit.

The usefulness of the approach presented here is that manually segmented data is not needed in order to train acoustic models. The results of the obtained segmentation are similar to those obtained using the HTK toolkit with the “flat-start” option activated. Finally, results using Artificial Neural Networks and manually segmented data are also reported for comparison purposes.

Keywords

Gaussian Mixture Model Automatic Segmentation Dynamic Time Warping Posteriori Probability Test Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Angelini, F. Brugnara, D. Falavigna, D. Giuliani, R. Gretter, and M. Omologo. Automatic Segmentation and Labeling of English and Italian Speech Databases. In Eurospeech93, volume 3, pages 653–656, Berlin (Germany), September 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Moreno, D. Poch, A. Bonafonte, E. Lleida, J. Llisterri, J. B. Mariño, and C. Nadeu. Albayzin Speech Database: Design of the Phonetic Corpus. In Eurospeech93, volume 1, pages 653–656, Berlin (Germany), September 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    María José Castro, Salvador España, Andrés Marzal, and Ismael Salvador. Grapheme-to-phoneme conversion for the Spanish language. In Proceedings of the IX National Symposium on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, pages397–402, Benicàssim (Spain), May 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Torres, A. Varona, and F. Casacuberta. Automatic segmentation and phone model initialization in continuous speech recognition. Proc. in Artificial Intelligence I:286–289, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steve Young, Julian Odell, Dave Ollason, Valtcho Valtchev, and Phil Woodlan. The HTK Book. Cambridge University, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Ander Gómez
    • 1
  • María José Castro
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y ComputaciónUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations