Advertisement

Shear Strength Affected by Suction Tension in Unsaturated Fine Grained Soils?

  • Carola Bönsch
  • Christof Lempp
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 112)

Summary

Suction tension acts within the gas and liquid filled grain-pore-system in unsaturated fine grained soils and should partly control the shear strength. The development of pore pressure in a completely water saturated grain structure will reduce the shear resistance, whereas the suction tension within an unsaturated soil will cause additional grain-to-grain forces. These are changing with varying degree of water saturation and thus may influence the shear strength probably by favouring the formation of coarse grained aggregates.

An experimental approach was started to investigate this expected relation in overconsolidated Tertiary clay and in Quaternary loess (silt) using triaxial and direct shear test results and comparing them with the results of suction tension measurements obtained by using pressure membrane apparatus. Based on the common classifications, one should argue that shear velocity will control the shear strength due to pore pressure effects in the shear zone. However, the antagonistic effects of overpressure of the pore fluid and compression of grains due to suction tension act on a micro-scale in unsaturated fine grained soils and influence the shear behaviour differently.

Effects of suction tension are noticeable in triaxial and direct shear tests in unsaturated fine grained soils. Quantification is difficult because other stress influences like load level act more effectively.

Key Words

suction tension water saturation shear strength loess clay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behrens W, Neumann M (2002) Untersuchungsergebnisse zu einigen mechanischen Eigenschaften von TRISOPLAST. Müll und Abfall 2:86–89Google Scholar
  2. Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress. Teknisk Ukeblad 106/39:859–863Google Scholar
  3. Bönsch C (2006) Weathering of partial saturated soft rock. In: Von Cotthem A, Charlier P, Thimus JF, Tshibangu JP (eds) Multiphysics coupling and long term behaviour in rock mechanics. Taylor and Francis London, pp 397–402Google Scholar
  4. Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil water characteristic curve, Can Geotech J 31:521–532Google Scholar
  5. Junge T, Gräsle W, Bensel G, Horn R (2000) Einfluss des Porenwasserdrucks auf die Zugfestigkeit von Bodenproben. J Plant Nutrition Soil Sci 163(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lu N, Likos WJ (2004) Unsaturated Soil Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Schanz T, Agus SS, Tscheschlok G (2004) Hydraulischmechanische Eigenschaften einer polymerverbesserten Sand-Bentonit-Mischung beim Einsatz im Deponiebau, Geotechnik 27(4):344–355Google Scholar
  8. Schick P (2004) Scherfestigkeit durch Kapillarität in unzementierten ungesättigten bindigen Böden, Bautechnik 81(1):90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vanapilli SK, Fredlund DG, Pufahl DE, Clifton AW (1996) A model for prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction, Can Geotech J 33:379–392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carola Bönsch
    • 1
  • Christof Lempp
    • 1
  1. 1.Martin-Luther-UniversityHalle (S.)Germany

Personalised recommendations