The Co-operative Evolution of Buildings and Cities

  • John Frazer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1370)

Abstract

This a position paper outlining the way thinking about co-operative buildings has developed over the last 30 years. It does not attempt to review the field in an objective manner but summarises the particular viewpoint of the author by reviewing selected co-operative projects. Starting briefly with the author’s final year thesis, the paper touches on projects for Cedric Price and Walter Segal with contrasting ideas about co-operation. The paper then expands on the concept of co-evolutionary theory including the co-operative evolution of buildings with each other, with the environment and with the inhabitants. It concentrates on the most recent co-evolutionary projects for buildings and cities. It describes the Groningen experiment which demonstrates these principles with a model which allows the co-operative development of the city with the “collective social ambition of the inhabitants.” The paper ends with a note about the “Talking Cities” project for global co-operation in the evolution of urban form. These examples are presented as a series of “vignettes” or glimpsas at history.

Keywords

co-operative buildings evolution of buildings evolution of urban form autotectonics genetically coded building generator co-evolutionary cities interactivator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frazer, J.H. (Feb. 1979). ‘Cedric Price’s Generator. Building Design.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frazer, J.H., & Connor, J.M. (1979). A Conceptual Seeding Technique for Architectural Design. In: PArC79, proceedings of International Conference on the Application of Computers in Architectural Design, Berlin, Online Conferences with AMK, 425–434.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frazer, J.H. (1982). Use of Simplified Three Dimensional Computer Input Devices to Encourage Public Participation in Design. In: Computer Aided Design 82, conference proceedings (Butterworth Scientific), 143–151.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frazer, J.H. (1992) Datastructures for Rule-Based and Genetic Design. In: T. L. Kunii (ed.), Visual Computing-Integrating Computer Graphics with Computer Vision. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag. 731–44.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frazer, J.H. (1994) The Genetic Language of Design in Textiles and New Technology. In: S. Braddock, & M. O’Mahony (eds.), 2010. London: Artemis. 77–79.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frazer, J.H. (1995a). An Evolutionary Architecture. London: Architectural Association Publications.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frazer, J.H. (1995b). An Evolutionary Architecture. London: Architectural Association. The generous support of the Arts Council of England is gratefully acknowledged for both the book and the exhibition.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frazer, J.H. (1995c). Architectural Experiments in Cyberspace. Architectural Design, 78–79.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frazer, J.H., Graham P.C., & Rastogi M. (April 1995). Biodiversity in Design via Internet. In: Proceedings of Conference Digital Creativity, Brighton, 97–106.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frazer, J.H., Rastogi, M., & Graham, P. (1995). “The Interactivator”, Architectural Design, Architects in Cyberspace, 80–81.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frazer, J.H. (1996a). “The Groningen Experiment”, Projects Review. London: Architectural Association Publications. 108–111.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frazer, J.H. (1996b). The Paradoxical Image of the Virtual World: Towards a New Theory of Spaces and Places. (in Japanese) Ten Plus One, 10 + 1,6, 100–103.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frazer, J.H., & Frazer, J.M. (1996). The Evolutionary Model of Design. In: Approaches to Computer Aided Architectural Composition, Technical University of Bialystok. 105–117.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frazer, J.H. (April 1997). Action and Observation: The Groningen Experiment. Abstracts of papers for Problems of Action and Observation Conference. Amsterdam. 14–16.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graham, P.C. (1995). Evolutionary and Rule-Based Techniques in Computer-Aided Design, Doctorate Thesis, University of Ulster.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham, P.C., Frazer, J.H., & Hull, M.C. (1993). The Application of Genetic Algorithms to Design Problems with Ill-defined or Conflicting Criteria. In: R. Glanville, & G. de Zeeuw (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Values and (In)Variants. Amsterdam. 61–75.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greig, J. (1988). Celebrating the Cerebral. Building Design, Supplement, May.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kunzru, H., & Search, J. (1995). Architects of Change. Wired, July/Aug, 68–71.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKean, J. (1989). Learning from Segal. Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearman, H. (1985). Computer-Aided Living. Design, September.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmitt, M. (1995). Exploring New Urban Strategies. workshop in the Opening the Envelope series. Groningen.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sudjic D. (1981). Birth of the Intelligent Building, Design, January.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Frazer
    • 1
  1. 1.School of DesignHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloon, Hong KongChina

Personalised recommendations