The value of project-based education in robotics

  • Igor M. Verner
Technical Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1395)


This article deals with the educational values of the robotics tournaments as a form of project-oriented learning in engineering. The features of the project-oriented education, namely motivation, problem solving, time limits, interdisciplinary approach, team-work cooperation and applicable outcome, are discussed in relation to the Robotics area context. The RoboCup survey data about the participants, their motivation for participating in the program and preferences in the prospective summer school curriculum are summarized. Suggestions for incorporating educational activities in the RoboCup program are proposed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kitano, H., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I., Asada, M., Matsubara, H., Osawa, E.: RoboCup: A Challenge Problem for AI, AI Magazine, 18(1) (1997) 73–85Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kitano, H., Veloso, M., Matsubara, H., Tambe, M., Coradeschi, S., Noda, I., Stone, P., Osawa, E., Asada, M.: The RoboCup Synthetic Agent Challenge 97. Proc. of 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1 (1997) 24–29Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitano, H., Asada, M., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I., Osawa, E.: RoboCup: The Robot World Cup Initiative. Proc. of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (1997) 340–347Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schachterle, L., Vinther, O.: Introduction: The Role of Projects in Engineering Education, European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2) (1996) 115–120Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolmos, A.: Reflections on Project Work and Problem-based Learning, European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2) (1996) 141–148Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibbs, G.: Improving the Quality of Learning, Bristol, Technical & Educational Services (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gates, A., Della-Piana, C., Bernat, A.: Affinity Groups: A Framework for Developing Workplace Skills. Proc. of 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, 1 (1997) 53–56Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manseur, R.: Development of an Undergraduate Robotics Course. Proc. of 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, 2 (1997) 610–612Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mehrl, D., Parten, M., Vines, D.: Robots Enhance Engineering Education. Proc. of 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, 2 (1997) 613–618Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wlodkowski, R. J.: Enhancing adult motivation to learn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publ. (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brooks, R.: Elephants don't play chess. In: Maes, P. (ed.): Designing Autonomous Agents, MIT Elsevier (1991) 3–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verner, I., Waks, S., Kolberg E.: High School Sci-Tech Project — An Insight into Engineering. Proc. of 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, 2 (1997) 949–954Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor M. Verner
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Education in Technology & ScienceTechnion - Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations